Kohbanang wrote:Hey there all :)
I would be happy if mine were already there. :D I use my knifes and do not look at her me not under the magnifying glass.

I will call it Pea counter.If you will find a small error you find. IMO i also can find nuts on my striders and Hinderer.
Sorry No attack against someone only my opinion
Enjoy the beautiful knifes of SPYDERCO :spyder:
Ankerson wrote:Yeah really I could go at any knife with my 105mm Macro Lens and blow up the photos and find all kinds of things if I really wanted to.
But I don't.
I have to agree. This macro photo thing has become a trend on this site lately. Several of the folks that have posted like this seem to have a history of having issues with more than one of their new Spyderco knives. My jimping looks fine to the naked eye on mine. When I look at it through a jeweler's loupe, it looks like it was done by human hands and I can find all kinds of flaws. Macro shots can be deceiving, making a booger look like a volcano at times.
The OP says that the knife is functionally flawed now because the jimping doesn't work. It can be argued that jimping on a thumb ramped knife is gratuitous anyway in terms of function. There are numerous models with a thumb ramp without jimping and I don't recall a groundswell of complaints about thumbs slipping up over the spine (the Superhawk comes to mind, as well as the Persian).
There is a strong sense of entitlement among some that when you pay good money for a knife it should be perfect. The question is, whose form of perfection are we talking about? Naked eye and functionally perfect or microscopic perfect?
The other odd thing about our hobby is that Spyderco makes highly sought-after and sometimes collectible
tools. The collectibility drives the demand for perfection, but it's still odd to me at times. I can't recall ever getting bent about machining marks on a new hammer.