Carbon - 1.1
Chromium - 16
Tungsten - 3.0
Vanadium - 3.0
Molybdenum - 1.5
Cobalt- 2.5
That's a sexy composition.
I suppose SPY27 could be considered a different take on VG10, both suped up VG10s, but personally I'd like to have both.
Do we have any performance testing data on VG-Max used in knives?Baron Mind wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 8:04 pmDoes anyone at Spyderco have any connections at Shun? Shun needs to let Spyderco do some sprints in VG-MAX. Would be good marketing for Shun. That steel looks.
Carbon - 1.1
Chromium - 16
Tungsten - 3.0
Vanadium - 3.0
Molybdenum - 1.5
Cobalt- 2.5
That's a sexy composition.
I suppose SPY27 could be considered a different take on VG10, both suped up VG10s, but personally I'd like to have both.
Spy27 is a better steel.Baron Mind wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 8:04 pmDoes anyone at Spyderco have any connections at Shun? Shun needs to let Spyderco do some sprints in VG-MAX. Would be good marketing for Shun. That steel looks.
Carbon - 1.1
Chromium - 16
Tungsten - 3.0
Vanadium - 3.0
Molybdenum - 1.5
Cobalt- 2.5
That's a sexy composition.
I suppose SPY27 could be considered a different take on VG10, both suped up VG10s, but personally I'd like to have both.
Thanks for the insight!Deadboxhero wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 1:26 amThere was a curious steel called 1.2838 that highlights why ingot VG Max is not ideal if the chemistry is correct and it is also a non pm steel.
1.2838,
is a high vanadium, high carbon steel roughly like "Super Blue", but with Vanadium thanstead.
Right away that will grab a lot of folks attention.
Personally I was also enthralled by its chemistry.
1.45% carbon
3.25% vanadium
0.40% manganese
0.25% silicon
Well, my excitement ended when I learned more about how carbides form in the steel and why the powdered metallurgy process is important for bypassing carbide growth to prevent massive sizes when cooling the steel from liquid when it's made. When the strong carbide forming elements and carbon are in significant amounts inside the steel massive blocky carbides will form when cooling to without a PM process.
The 1.2838 would be a blocky mess.
What if we PM it?
Well, there is already a steel that fits that role without reinventing the wheel. (Something Larrin pointed out to me when we had the conversation about 1.2838)
CPM 4V, a fine structured Vanadium rich carbon steel capable of high hardness and good edge stability with air hardening to boot.
If VG Max is an ingot steel it would not be desirable for the above reasons.
Even if it was a PM grade the Chromium volume is higher than it needs to be and not as ideal and will lead to more blocky chromium carbides.
Spy27 has a better carbon chromium balance.
The vanadium in VGmax won't be as exciting as one would think either even if it was a PM steel.
Vanadium has an affinity for chromium carbide and likes to enrich the chromium carbides if the chromium volume is significant. This is why steels like elmax and m390 don't actually make a lot of vanadium carbide despite having a decent amount of an vanadium.
So Spy27 is the better steel to VG Max and what's available to Spyderco.
Even if Somehow VG Max was available there's just simply better steels available to select in 2020.