


Still working on it. The microbevel isn't so micro right now either, was trying to take out some of the edge damage. This geometry + a hair whittling sharp edge is truly for the cut connoisseur.



It is to improve cutting performance. The thinner the blade is, the less resistance there will be in a cut. It takes very little mass to perform all my usual cutting tasks. Something like an Opinel or SAK is robust enough for the cutting I do 95% of the time. I wouldn't recommend something like this for a knife that sees rough use, but most knives in my experience can safely be taken to 16-20 degrees inclusive with a microbevel and stand up to anything you'd expect a knife to take.David Lowry wrote:Vivi,
Nice pics. Please forgive me but I don't understand what that helps. I honestly don't, so maybe you could tell me. If I should make a seperate thread outside of this thread just let me know.
Does that just make for less resistance with what you are cutting? How much different does it feel from the factory edge?
Thanks.
It's mainly just an experiment to see how thin I can take S30V before it's too weak to be an EDC. I'm going to keep grinding until there is no microbevel and try cutting a few things with it like that to see what happens under magnification at the edge. Then I'll put on my usual edge.MAT888 wrote:VIVI,
Chips and dings can be taken out with a 90 degree angle cutting in the stone on a coarse diamond benchstone. About 20 passes should do on a XXC DMT...
I would have left the stock at 15. Microbevel does the cutting and back bevel stock doesn't make much difference unless it has a 4/5mm thick spine. :cool:
No. I usually have a SAK or LM Squirt on my keychain if it came down to it, but I've never encountered anything I've had to cut that the UKPK couldn't handle with it's last edge (~8 deg. per side or so). My usual EDC tasks aren't too rough, just cardboard, food prep, wood, vegetation, mail, opening boxes and packages etc.Spydiman wrote:Do you carry around another knife in case you DO run into something harder to cut?
I've had a different experience. I've tested out thin edges (6-10 deg per side + microbevel) chopping wood, batoning wood, cutting thick plastic, cutting knotty wood, batoning through power cables cat5 cable and coax cable etc. along with my usual EDC tasks. The only thing that's visibly damaged it was the coax cable, everything else it handled without harm.LowTEC wrote:at 40 degree , my military edge gets dull after cutting on those regular plastic cutting board for a day or 2, your UKPK might get dull in couple slices on the cutting board with that kind of an angle (<20?). Wow :D
I decided to go this thin because I haven't found the point that's too thin to stand up to EDC use. Once I do, I'll edge my knives right above that point, to get the best cutting perfomance I can while keeping it strong enough to not baby.Left Hand Path wrote:That looks like a high-performance edge, Vivi. Thanks for posting the pictures. I thin the edge (re-bevel) on every knife I get, but I haven't taken any quite that far.
I am curious - what caused those chips in the edge?









Edge damage is mostly gone, slices much more smoothly now.Left Hand Path wrote:That looks really good. I bet that is quite the cutter. Looks like the edge damaged was removed or at least reduced.
Do you know the approximate edge angles on that one for primary and micro bevel? Do you use calipers or anything to measure thickness at the shoulder?
Do you have any videos of you sharpening? I always apply the primary bevel freehand, but I usually use the Sharpmaker for the micro. Yesterday I sharpened a Victorinox kitchen knife totally freehand using DMT diamonds and then the Spyderco Profiles. It was a great feeling to get a shaving sharp edge freehand. I am curious how you orient the stone while finishing on the finer grits? Do you alternate sides with each stroke?
How much width (if any) have you lost during all the reprofiling/rebeveling and removing the chips? I have never handled a UKPK, but I am familiar with the Caly 3 and on the 2 that I have seen the edge/tip was not covered all that much by the handle when closed. It just seemed to me that it wouldn't be able to lose much blade width before the tip would be exposed when the knife was closed.