So much here to refer to :Bolster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 05, 2026 3:26 pmMushroom wrote: ↑Wed Feb 04, 2026 10:11 amI hate to say it but even some "knife people" might question that $100 price tag once they get it in hand. This knife is impressively THIN!!! Blade stock and handle. The handle feels like 75¢ worth of FRN. (At least the prototype at BLADE Show felt that way. I believe they may have increased the blade stock thickness since that prototype, so the knife most likely feels different now)...
This is the bucket I'm in. In photos I've seen, the Charisma looks unimpressive - inexpensive and plasticky. Would prefer no (or smaller) opening hole on a blade this size. Not even a fan of the steel. Yet I fully intend to spend a Benjamin to obtain one, since I'm a Spyderhead and I do like thin, lightweight knives. In this case, perceived utility outweighs perceived build quality for me. Being Spyderco is Spyderco, they may negate my expectations with a quality feel in hand that I'm not expecting. They've earned this sort of trust over the years--I put more faith in their design ability than in my own judgment of it.
![]()
inexpensive and plasticky. = that is what people keep telling me they don't like about the regular size basic Griptillian .
I say they don''t appreciate the design which is : big handle / strong enough / plenty light (only gives the impression of plasticy because of the way the hollow handle sounds while handling it . I LOVE THAT KNIFE !
looks unimpressive = so does a scalpel . ( I actually like looking at the sleek Charisma )
prefer no (or smaller) opening hole on a blade this size.= yep could be a failure point ( we have to assume they tested the bajeezes out of it , like they always do and it will be just fine (with this steel alloy ) .
they may negate my expectations with a quality feel in hand that I'm not expecting. They've earned this sort of trust over the years = well said .

