JD Spydo wrote:
To take your last question first concerning the steel for a Hawkbill i.e. H-1? Personally I would like to see a Hawkbill with LC200N>> the two people I've chatted with recently that own and use the TUSK model which is made with LC200N have both told me very positive things about it. So yes I would love to see a Hawkbill with LC200N regardless of what handle material they would use.
Joe,
LC200N is known for rust resistance. Why would you think that this steel will be better or equal to H1 or at least equal to VG10 for SE Hawkbill? Tusk has PE and regular shape blade.
JD Spydo wrote:
As far as using G-10 handles which you believe would put them out of many people's price range>> I see where you're coming from but I just don't 100% agree with you there because as expensive as a lot of these newer Spyders are with their supersteels and exotic handle materials I just don't think it has hurt the sales of certain Spyderco knives that meet that criteria.
One sterling example is this recent Sprint Run CTS-204P bladed C-36 Military model. From what I've been told they are selling rather rapidly.
All depends what do you consider rapidly. This is limited run. It is for sale for at least a month and still available. Nobody except the dealer knows how many were sold. Also recent sale is not really a sign of rapid sale.
JD Spydo wrote:
I just think with a better handle the Spyderco Hawkbills might start appealing to more gardeners, landscapers and other professionals.
You remember that Superhawk CF and very inexpensive VG10 was discontinued quite fast due to poor sale.
I still want Spyderhawk SE sprint. H1 /FRN, just make different color than original (to call it sprint) and if it will have street price under $100, 1200 blades will sold fast.