Ankerson wrote:This is after 820 slicing cuts through 5/8" Manila rope.
Good Lord! I hope you're not sacrificing your right wrist by doing it all in one sitting (I assume you're not ambidextrous). Take care of your wrist man. We need more cutting results in the future!
P.S. YOu left a pretty clear latent print on that blade... sure hope you're not on the run.
Now I'm wondering if the K390 will outperform even the S110v in this manila rope cutting contest. It's a Bohler vs. CPM knock down, drag out, brawl. Can dialing back Vanadium a tad, and boosting tungsten, work together the make K390 more edge retentive than S110v, which instead of the K390's 1% Tunsten opted for 3.5% Columbian aka Niobium? Does this remind anyone of chemistry class?
If in fact K390 is, say 25% more edge retentive than S110v, does it then becomes a trade-off between the ultimate edge retention of K390 vs. the stainless quality of s110v? Can anyone comment on which steel well be more prone to breaking of a point under abuse than the other? Will s110v be easier then to keep sharp, and/or reprofile, than k390?