Me too. I also prefer function over form. Thats why I am here on the Spyderco forum.PHP87 wrote:
I prefer substance over style. That being said...
I still know a sexy knife when I see one though. :)
Me too. I also prefer function over form. Thats why I am here on the Spyderco forum.PHP87 wrote:
I prefer substance over style. That being said...
The BT II cost less than the Matriarch 2 and uses superior materials as I've outlined in a previous post.Surfingringo wrote:Me too. I also prefer function over form. Thats why I am here on the Spyderco forum.PHP87 wrote:
I prefer substance over style. That being said...
I still know a sexy knife when I see one though. :)
Ok, thanks. Welcome to the forum PHP87. :)PHP87 wrote:The BT II cost less than the Matriarch 2 and uses superior materials as I've outlined in a previous post.Surfingringo wrote:Me too. I also prefer function over form. Thats why I am here on the Spyderco forum.PHP87 wrote:
I prefer substance over style. That being said...
I still know a sexy knife when I see one though. :)
But if you want to believe what you want, go right ahead.
Surfingringo wrote:Ok, thanks. Welcome to the forum PHP87. :)PHP87 wrote:The BT II cost less than the Matriarch 2 and uses superior materials as I've outlined in a previous post.Surfingringo wrote:Me too. I also prefer function over form. Thats why I am here on the Spyderco forum.PHP87 wrote:
I prefer substance over style. That being said...
I still know a sexy knife when I see one though. :)
But if you want to believe what you want, go right ahead.
I'm sure you know that Sal? (Or where you thinking of Lynn Thompson?"MCM wrote:I am waiting for the video of Sal attacking a hanging side of beef, a couple whole pigs or a rope or rolled mat, bamboo or what ever with a folder.
Or the lock test! Or how about a two handed Chinese War Sword colab! And a boot full of meat!
LOL LOL
(kidding) :o
I'll disagree with you. The Emerson Wave device came out on the ESM-1, which later morphed into the Commander. Initially it was a blade-catcher of sorts, but was found to open the knife blade upon pulling it out of the pocket. Ernest Emerson then had it patented in 1999.PHP87 wrote:CS has been using a thumb plate for quite some time on numerous knifes and its a lot different than the "wave' feature.
Otherwise, Emerson would have taken them to court and collected a hefty judgement.
BTW, CS has been putting thumb plates long before Emerson started selling knives, so maybe Emerson should ask CS for their "kind permission"
But it doesn't matter as the two styles are much different.
Halfneck wrote:I'll disagree with you. The Emerson Wave device came out on the ESM-1, which later morphed into the Commander. Initially it was a blade-catcher of sorts, but was found to open the knife blade upon pulling it out of the pocket. Ernest Emerson then had it patented in 1999.PHP87 wrote:CS has been using a thumb plate for quite some time on numerous knifes and its a lot different than the "wave' feature.
Otherwise, Emerson would have taken them to court and collected a hefty judgement.
BTW, CS has been putting thumb plates long before Emerson started selling knives, so maybe Emerson should ask CS for their "kind permission"
But it doesn't matter as the two styles are much different.
I don't recall seeing the thumb plates appear on Cold Steel knives until later. The Cold Steel folders I recall from that time period had thumb studs.
And the thumb plate is just different enough from the wave that they can avoid litigation.
Copied & pasted from the Cold Steel website.PHP87 wrote:Back to the point, the "Wave'' and Thumb Plate have little in common and AFAIK, CS doesn't advertise it to deploy the blade by hooking it on your pocket as you draw your knife.