With honestly all due respect to William Munny, here I have to disagree.BH66 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 3:47 am... Para 3 is more hard user than sage wish is another great thing.WilliamMunny wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2024 7:27 am... I would say the Sage 5 is a more of an office weekend knife where the Para 3 might be more of a camping knife.,,,
,,,
Though out of the two models I only have experience with the Para 3 (and there the LW in SE), for me this is more a general question of concept.
- I can´t see any aspect that makes the Para 3 more "hard use" than the Sage 5 when it comes to folders.
I don´t think that there is any even just very remotely still thinkable folder task that would break the 3mm Sage blade earlier than the 3.7 mm Para 3 blade.
In fact imo the only part of a blade that is somewhat likely to snap in folder tasks is the very tip: And when it comes to that, the Sage 5 tip is probably stronger than the Para 3 tip, just by blade geometry (just a guess, no real data here!), while its overall thinner and tall blade might be slicier. To me a win win for the Sage 5.
I actually use the Chaparral, overall shaped a lot like a Lil Sage, with its only 2mm blade pretty "hard". No problems here, cause the wide blade with the rather blunt tip when looking at the flat of the blade, is strong enough.
Another thing I would consider are ergos:
Just to me the "hook" at the end of the Para 3 handle makes not much sense, since it restricts the grip area behind the choil on that already not too long handle.
The Sage on the other hand has a handle shape that does all to actually maximize the grip area behind the choil. To me only a good thing on such smaller folders.
Just my 2c of course.
Since someone would do so anyway pretty soon, let me say it myself right now: TRY BOTH!
