Dilly Dilly!!! :D
Lol, in all seriousness Joe is correct. You have what are considered deadly weapons.
Dilly Dilly!!! :D
OMG! it's a good thing I wasn't drinking anything when I read this post, it would have been spattered all over my tablet screen!
If they would re-make that two handed machete with a better handle and a more serious tool steel blade I would pay big money for an upgraded version of that two handed machete. At the time we were getting those ( between 2004 to 2007) we were selling all of them we could get. And they were made in some factory in South Africa. If I go hiking in the woods which I don't do much anymore because of all the criminals we have living in the woods here in Missouri>> I don't go alone and I don't go unarmed anymore at all. And that two-handed machete would be good against a wolf, pack of coyotes, mountain lion ( Yes we now have them back here in Missouri again) this two-handed, Cold Steel machete would even make any predator think twice. The trouble with mountain lions is they mostly attack people from the back>> so unless you hear him coming you are at a serious disadvantage.xceptnl wrote: ↑Mon Oct 22, 2018 6:21 pmI have one of these great tools as well. Never considered it for self defense but in the woods I can see how useful it could be against a predator should I be unfortunate enough to be within arms reach of one.JD Spydo wrote: ↑Mon Oct 22, 2018 11:15 am......
Also out of this batch of Cold Steel self defense tools I've got what they called a "Two-Handed" Machete. Cold Steel imported them from South Africa of all places. These two handed Machetes are really nice and when I do hike in the woods I always take that tool with me. It truly has a multitude of uses and I wouldn't even mind having another one.
I carried a Benchmade pen for years until I lost it last year. I replaced it with a Hinderer Investigator pen, nice compact impact weapon should I have the need for one. Along those same lines, I have thought to myself before how useful a Police 4 or Military could be in the closed position as a blunt impact tool
Great comments as usual Mr. Janich Speaking of the tools I got from Cold Steel about 10 years ago that were made of that "Chinese White Wax" wood I also got a walking cane made of that same wood. Since my radical knee surgery I got this past summer I've been using that White Wax Wood cane and it would make an excellent weapon if needed.Michael Janich wrote: ↑Tue Oct 23, 2018 7:01 amIn my opinion, the best improvised weapons are those that you carry with you and have other primary purposes--like flashlights, pens/markers, and canes. Flashlights are extremely useful and are a great physical reminder to be aware of your surroundings
Similarly, a sturdy pen or marker makes a great fist-load weapon that allows you to hit with great effect.
Canes are awesome weapons, provided they're wielded with reasonable tactics. The cane systems of many martial arts are far too complicated and require too many physical attributes to be used effectively, especially by folks who need canes as mobility aids. Canes are also difficult to use in confined areas.
Sad that's a new reality we have to live with and think about these days. We had to take a mandatory training class on what to do/not do in an active shooter situation at my job just a couple years ago.Sjucaveman wrote: ↑Tue Oct 23, 2018 9:46 amThe main time I think of this is regarding an active shooter situation at work. I've thought of various weapons I might use based on where I am at in the building and what's available there. Of course given the opportunity fleeing the area is preferred but not always possible. Since i cannot carry a firearm at work I've thought of alternatives.
Mastiff, that is actually another part of the original question I have, which I do not like. In my eyes, if you are a legitimate self-protector, protecting your person and property, everything should be cut and dried. In an ideal situation, the law/legal system should, in my view of things, side with you, the person defending and protecting yourself from an assailant, an attacker. Sadly, as you and others have rightly pointed out, both here and in everyday life, the legal system of today is not that cut and dried. Someone pointed out to me that it was never that way, I kind of disagree: unless someone was part of the local "good old boys club" and attacked someone, in general, it seems to me (at least in old America of the 1950s and before), the judges, lawyers, police officers, sheriffs, and townsfolk and city folk would all side with you, and you would not in the least bit face any danger of legal repercussions for obviously defending yourself.The Mastiff wrote: ↑Tue Oct 23, 2018 1:23 amThe problem as I see it with these "weapons" is that their use will get one charged with attempted murder as fast as using a firearm will if the conditions of self defense aren't met. In that case why the heck not use a firearm? If you can have one of these you can probably have a firearm. If one is in an airplane crash or somewhere that no weapons will be available a torpedo or other make do thing won't either. In that case rocks, sticks or whatever is available can and should be used. For those in countries where weapons and self defense aren't valid this isn't meant to be relevant to your situation and I'll leave that alone.
Joe
Stand your ground laws help a bit but even in those states in the one place you are all you need is a media driven politically whipped up lynch mob ( with paid protestors shipped from out of state) and you are at the mercy of the local DA. Who is elected or has plans for higher office.What can be done for a law abiding citizen who wants to protect themselves to be able to do so without the fear of the legal system coming against them, instead of coming against the one it should be against: The attacker/initiator of violent assault? Stand your Ground laws are a good one.