All good and fair points.Bolster wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 10:50 pmVery interesting writeup, thank you! I have a niggle--unimportant, minor--but a niggle all the same:
“…Lil’ Temperance 3 Lightweight is a formidable 'hard use' cutting tool with virtually the same cutting edge length as the much larger and heavier Manix 2…”
Shouldn't we compare LW to LW? If so:
LT3LW: 3.8 oz
M2LW: 2.9 oz
The LT3LW is over 30% heavier than a Manix LW.
You're correct that the Manix is longer in the pocket (closed dimension 4.7") than the LT (closed dimension 4.4") but I'm not sure 0.3" qualifies the Manix as "much larger" when you factor in the LT's additional weight.
Yes, cutting edge is very similar as you say, thanks to the Manix' generous index choil. However blade length (a consideration in SD) favors the Manix, which gets its edge out there by another half inch:
LT3LW: 2.9"
M2LW: 3.4"
My read is that the Manix 2 LW is a little longer in the pocket, but lighter. Without a side-by-side, I can't really speak to the tallness of the handles, but I get the impression the LT3LW is fairly tall. (So is the Manix.)
Niggle aside, great review and an interesting knife, the LT3LW. I'm trying to decide if it's for me, and to understand why the folks on the forum like it so much. It sounds like a knife you have to hold before deciding if it's for you.
As far as the comparative "tallness" of the knives, the LT3LW is a hair under 32 mm at the widest point of the handle's palm swell while the Manix 2 is right around 30 mm. The LT3LW is less tall when closed, however, coming in at about 44 mm at its widest extent to the Manix 2's 45 mm (the blade of the LT3LW sits lower in the handle when closed). All in all, the differences in handle height & closed width between the two are quite minor.
Oh, and a couple of reasons why I didn't do a LW to LW comparison: (a) I didn't have a Manix 2 LW handy

EDIT: edited for formatting