I agree with your philosophy. I answered in a general way that it would not be an overly expensive knife or one that I would feel bad if it got damaged. But.... I will use any tool I own/purchase for the job it is intended to do. I'll carry the REX 121 and use it; Maybe not often, and I don't want to damage it, but I will still use it. I have woodworking tools I feel the same way about. Some I would hate to drop on the concrete floor, but I use them every day, regardless.Wartstein wrote: ↑Fri Jan 30, 2026 2:56 amReading more posts and thinking about it I guess I have to qualify a bit what I said above:Wartstein wrote: ↑Thu Jan 29, 2026 1:31 pmDavid, I can totally relate to what you are saying:
- To me every single knife I buy (folders: exclusively Spyderco) always is a "beater knife" in the sense that I use all of them for any even just remotely "knife-ish" task.
Price, value, rarity... is completely irrelevant to me.
- I fully respect if people have "safe queens" or like to keep some or all of their folders more or less pristine, no right or wrong here... but to me it would feel extremely weird to just "own" a Spyderco, perfectly designed to get used... and then not really and without any hesitation using it.
- Of course it helps that the more a knife gets and looks used, the more beautiful and of higher personal value it becomes to me personally.
- I am actually sometimes a bit surprised how many knives on pics here at least look as if they never got really used - no scratches, no nicks, no nothing. Again, perfectly fine of course - but nothing I could even attempt concerning the way mine are all exclusively "beaters".
- What is definitely true:
I make no difference at all between knives when it comes to getting scratches, dings, nicks, "imperfections from use" as long as nothing occurs that would substantially impair performance.
So I´d use the most expensive Spydie or most rare sprint run exactly the same as a basic Tenacious or Byrd and always appreciate when a knife shows signs of real use and to me thus "life" and gets its own "history".
- BUT: Yes, I do differentiate between folders purely concerning the likelyhood that there could occur substantial damage that WOULD impair basic performance.
This is mostly related to tip strength: While I believe overall blade stock pretty much never is an issue in folder "beater" use, TIPS can get to fine for that and a broken tip is beyond what I´d consider "beautiful signs of use", but makes a knife less functional.
So in very rare extreme "beater" situations I´d ideally choose a strong, sabre grind tip.
My personal philosophy about tools: Tools are useless if they are not used.