The MicroJimbo reviewed: The Yojimbo 2 as a "little big knife"
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2024 3:05 pm
When word first started going around the forums a couple of years ago that a smaller version of the Yojimbo 2 was in the works, my interest was very much piqued. The Michael Janich-designed Yojimbo 2 is my primary work knife, and has been for several years: While Spyderco’s so-called “tactical Wharncliffe” was originally intended to be a self-defence tool, the same features that make it an excellent combatives implement also make it a superlative utility cutter. I’ve written before and in detail about the Yojimbo 2’s effectiveness as a warehouse knife in a review linked here—I actually recommend reading that review before continuing further with this post, as most of my thoughts about the MicroJimbo are how it compares to its bigger brother. Go ahead, this post will still be here when you get back.
All done? Welcome back.
It would be rather reductive to describe the MicroJimbo as nothing more than a shrunken version of the Yojimbo 2. While it has a shorter blade length (2.45” vs 3.20”), a shorter overall length (6.22” vs. 7.69”), and a lighter weight (3.0 oz. vs 4.1 oz.), the MicroJimbo’s blade opening arc and its “cockpit”—the area defined by the spatial relationship of the opening hole and pivot—are virtually unchanged from the full-sized model. What this means for the experienced Yojimbo 2 user is that there isn’t a lot of recalibration of fine motor skills necessary with regards to blade deployment, which is an especially important detail when considering the Yojimbo family of knives’ self-defence remit.
Of course, It isn’t possible to scale down the Yojimbo 2 design to the degree seen in the MicroJimbo without affecting some of its functional ergonomics. It’s a given that the MicroJimbo has less cutting edge than the full-sized Yojimbo 2 (2.23” vs. 3.00”). Also, as I’ve written in my review of the Yojimbo 2, one of my favourite features of the knife is the protruding butt-end of the handle, which is very useful for light hammering and breaking perforations on boxes. The smaller and lighter MicroJimbo just isn’t as effective at those tasks. It should be noted that I don’t really take these two points against the MicroJimbo, as these compromises are inevitable when reformatting the Yojimbo 2 design to fit a smaller physical configuration.
The MicroJimbo isn’t just shorter than the Yojimbo 2, it also isn’t as wide (or isn’t “as tall”, if you like) in the handle. I do have enough handle to securely hold and bear down on the MicroJimbo behind the forward finger guard in use, but there is no denying that it is less hand-filling than the Yojimbo 2 (note that I am sized as a Medium in Mechanix work gloves). While a non-issue for my use case, this can be a potential cause of discomfort or even cramping during extended periods of cutting, as it often is with smaller-handled knives. Over the past three weeks of use, I also occasionally found myself unwittingly choking up on the MicroJimbo while cutting, placing my index finger over the junction of the ricasso and forward finger guard, since the knife is roughly the same width there as the Yojimbo 2 is behind its forward finger guard. It’s not a big deal all things considered and it is something that will most certainly go away as I become more familiar with the ergonomic subtleties of the smaller model, but it is also an indication that a transition to the MicroJimbo from the Yojimbo 2 isn’t 100% seamless.
Another major difference between the MicroJimbo and the Yojimbo 2 concerns the blade geometry. Not only is the MicroJimbo’s CPM S30V blade less wide (or “less tall”) than the one on the Yojimbo 2—in a design decision intended to assuage some user concerns about the durability of the distinctive Yojimbo 2 blade tip—the MicroJimbo also trades the Yojimbo 2’s high hollow grind for a full flat grind. So despite having the same 0.145” blade stock thickness as the Yojimbo 2, the MicroJimbo’s blade thickens up behind the edge a bit more quickly as one goes up towards the spine. The shorter blade also means that the MicroJimbo has a slightly more obtuse distal taper towards its tip. All of this presumably makes the MicroJimbo less of an outstanding slicer compared to the Yojimbo 2—particularly for incisions that require the full length and breadth of the blade to go through dense synthetic materials (such as thick slabs of closed-cell packaging foam)—but I honestly didn’t notice much of a performance difference between the two while doing regular warehouse work cutting tasks, where I primarily employ the tip of the blade and the the first inch of the cutting edge behind the tip.
The one design decision that I do take mild issue with is the MicroJimbo’s deep-carry pocket clip. In hand, I do like the use of the short wire clip on the MicroJimbo instead of the regular-sized hourglass clip equipped on the Yojimbo 2, as it feels more comfortable when paired with the smaller handle. But I much prefer having a bit of handle poking out of the pocket when it comes to my work knives as it makes it easier to draw the knife for use. Working in a very fast-paced warehouse environment, there were a couple of times when I had to fiddle around a bit more than I liked to securely pull the MicroJimbo out of my pocket. This is a very minor complaint, though, and I am certain that I’ll be able to draw the MicroJimbo just as fast as I do the Yojimbo 2 with time and practice. Already, I am much quicker on the draw with the knife now than I was three weeks ago.
Because of these notable differences between the MicroJimbo and Yojimbo 2, users who simply want a version of the latter that is compliant with 2.5” blade length limits might find the ChicagoJimbo—a “chopped” Yojimbo 2 customized by Janich that is sold through the 5x5 Combat Solutions website—a more preferable option to the MicroJimbo as it maintains the Yojimbo 2’s full-sized handle, hollow ground blade geometry, and “non-deep carry” pocket clip.
I do think that the MicroJimbo fills a functional sub-niche apart from the one already filled by the ChicagoJimbo, however. As mentioned earlier, the MicroJimbo’s smaller handle makes the excellent Yojimbo 2 design accessible to those with petite hands. And while I think the concerns some users raise about the durability of the Yojimbo 2’s blade tip are somewhat overblown, the MicroJimbo’s full-flat ground blade should satisfy those who are much harder on (or less careful with) their tools. An aside: I have never broken the tip off a Yojimbo 2 in the several years that I’ve used one as a work knife, even as I’ve broken the tips of two Para Military 2s—one in S30V, another in S45VN, and both with a full-flat grind—in the same timeframe. Anecdotal evidence, I know, but there it is.
Even those such as myself who do not have to contend with 2.5” blade length restrictions, have no issues with the Yojimbo 2’s handle size, and are unbothered by its hollow-ground blade, can find a lot of practical value in the MicroJimbo’s more compact footprint and lighter weight. I carry a lot of stuff in my pants pockets and on my belt loops when I am at work. Besides the usual wallet and smartphone, I also carry car keys, forklift keys, a Leatherman Charge Plus multitool, a pocket organizer with various small tools and accessories, hearing protection, a ballpoint pen, a felt marker, folded-up emails and truck manifest printouts that inevitably accumulate over the course of a shift, work gloves on a carabiner, a Motorola two-way radio on a belt clip, and a belt-mounted trauma kit (I am the senior industrial/occupational first aid responder at my workplace). It all adds up in weight and bulk, so a significantly smaller and lighter version of the Yojimbo 2 that retains most of its functional ergonomics is something that definitely has a place in my work knife rotation.
I also regularly carry the Yojimbo 2 as my folding knife outside of work, but there are certain situations where I do need to carry something lighter and less bulky in the pocket. I spend a lot of my free time trail running, and the Yojimbo 2 isn’t particularly suited to being clipped to the types of pockets found in running shorts or running tights—in these instances, I usually carry a Delica 4 or Native 5 Lightweight, or even something smaller like a Dragonfly 2 or a Ladybug 3. The MicroJimbo, despite weighing a fraction of an ounce more than a Delica 4 or Native 5 Lightweight, is still light enough that it doesn’t flop around while clipped to my running shorts pocket, and it is small enough that it actually fits in the back pockets of my running tights.
In addition, I believe that the additional discretion afforded by the MicroJimbo is very much a worthwhile feature in certain professional and social contexts. As a reasonable knife enthusiast, I think it is important to be considerate of persons who—due to their beliefs, cultural upbringing, or a history of trauma—are legitimately and genuinely uncomfortable around people who carry items they deem as weapons. I have close friends who fall into this group, and I appreciate that some of them have to overcome mental and emotional barriers when they spend time socializing with someone they know is carrying a knife. The very least I can do to reciprocate their tolerance and respect for my personal interests is to carry a knife when I am around them that, by virtue of its smaller size, can be seen by the uninitiated as falling into the category of “tool” rather than “weapon”. The MicroJimbo lets me do this without compromising on the Yojimbo 2 design’s essential functions or the manual dexterity I have developed with the Yojimbo platform over the years.
I like diversity in design in knives but when it comes to work tools, I value familiarity just as much, if not more, as it facilitates efficiency and safety. As someone who uses a knife not only in my job but also recreationally, I am quite invested in the Yojimbo platform—besides “dailying” a Yojimbo 2 for years and having put in a not-insignificant amount of time doing FMA drills with the Yojimbo 2 trainer, I also carry a Yojumbo on the somewhat rare occasions I need a larger folder, and the Ronin 2 (the fixed-blade version of the Yojimbo 2) is my preferred small/mid-sized belt knife when I go camping. It only makes sense that if I were to use a small folder for work, it would be something that takes inspiration from the Yojimbo 2.
After three weeks of using the MicroJimbo as my primary warehouse work knife, I can say with full confidence that it retains many of the Yojimbo 2’s most salient functional and ergonomic qualities and is a worthy addition to Spyderco’s catalogue of “little big knives” (i.e., compact folders that handle like much bigger knives) that includes models such as the industrial design masterpiece that is the Dragonfly 2 and the miniature workhorse that is the Lil’ Native. For the user who already likes the Yojimbo 2 but wants a version that carries smaller and lighter in the pocket, the MicroJimbo definitely fits the bill. For users with smaller hands who find the Yojimbo 2 too large to grip comfortably for extended periods, the MicroJimbo offers a chance to experience the design in a more compact form factor. And for users who want a version of the Yojimbo 2 that can be used in jurisdictions that restrict the carry of folding knives to those with blades less than 2.5” long, the MicroJimbo offers a legally-compliant blade and a more affordable alternative to the ChicagoJimbo.
Ultimately, I think it is the adherence to the Yojimbo design language that is the MicroJimbo’s strongest selling point and perhaps somewhat ironically, it is probably what is most likely to limit its appeal (i.e., if you don’t like the Yojimbo 2 for reasons other than it being too large for your hands, you probably won’t like the MicroJimbo, either).
[EDITED 08/10/24 for formatting]
All done? Welcome back.
It would be rather reductive to describe the MicroJimbo as nothing more than a shrunken version of the Yojimbo 2. While it has a shorter blade length (2.45” vs 3.20”), a shorter overall length (6.22” vs. 7.69”), and a lighter weight (3.0 oz. vs 4.1 oz.), the MicroJimbo’s blade opening arc and its “cockpit”—the area defined by the spatial relationship of the opening hole and pivot—are virtually unchanged from the full-sized model. What this means for the experienced Yojimbo 2 user is that there isn’t a lot of recalibration of fine motor skills necessary with regards to blade deployment, which is an especially important detail when considering the Yojimbo family of knives’ self-defence remit.
The MicroJimbo isn’t just shorter than the Yojimbo 2, it also isn’t as wide (or isn’t “as tall”, if you like) in the handle. I do have enough handle to securely hold and bear down on the MicroJimbo behind the forward finger guard in use, but there is no denying that it is less hand-filling than the Yojimbo 2 (note that I am sized as a Medium in Mechanix work gloves). While a non-issue for my use case, this can be a potential cause of discomfort or even cramping during extended periods of cutting, as it often is with smaller-handled knives. Over the past three weeks of use, I also occasionally found myself unwittingly choking up on the MicroJimbo while cutting, placing my index finger over the junction of the ricasso and forward finger guard, since the knife is roughly the same width there as the Yojimbo 2 is behind its forward finger guard. It’s not a big deal all things considered and it is something that will most certainly go away as I become more familiar with the ergonomic subtleties of the smaller model, but it is also an indication that a transition to the MicroJimbo from the Yojimbo 2 isn’t 100% seamless.
The one design decision that I do take mild issue with is the MicroJimbo’s deep-carry pocket clip. In hand, I do like the use of the short wire clip on the MicroJimbo instead of the regular-sized hourglass clip equipped on the Yojimbo 2, as it feels more comfortable when paired with the smaller handle. But I much prefer having a bit of handle poking out of the pocket when it comes to my work knives as it makes it easier to draw the knife for use. Working in a very fast-paced warehouse environment, there were a couple of times when I had to fiddle around a bit more than I liked to securely pull the MicroJimbo out of my pocket. This is a very minor complaint, though, and I am certain that I’ll be able to draw the MicroJimbo just as fast as I do the Yojimbo 2 with time and practice. Already, I am much quicker on the draw with the knife now than I was three weeks ago.
Because of these notable differences between the MicroJimbo and Yojimbo 2, users who simply want a version of the latter that is compliant with 2.5” blade length limits might find the ChicagoJimbo—a “chopped” Yojimbo 2 customized by Janich that is sold through the 5x5 Combat Solutions website—a more preferable option to the MicroJimbo as it maintains the Yojimbo 2’s full-sized handle, hollow ground blade geometry, and “non-deep carry” pocket clip.
I do think that the MicroJimbo fills a functional sub-niche apart from the one already filled by the ChicagoJimbo, however. As mentioned earlier, the MicroJimbo’s smaller handle makes the excellent Yojimbo 2 design accessible to those with petite hands. And while I think the concerns some users raise about the durability of the Yojimbo 2’s blade tip are somewhat overblown, the MicroJimbo’s full-flat ground blade should satisfy those who are much harder on (or less careful with) their tools. An aside: I have never broken the tip off a Yojimbo 2 in the several years that I’ve used one as a work knife, even as I’ve broken the tips of two Para Military 2s—one in S30V, another in S45VN, and both with a full-flat grind—in the same timeframe. Anecdotal evidence, I know, but there it is.
Even those such as myself who do not have to contend with 2.5” blade length restrictions, have no issues with the Yojimbo 2’s handle size, and are unbothered by its hollow-ground blade, can find a lot of practical value in the MicroJimbo’s more compact footprint and lighter weight. I carry a lot of stuff in my pants pockets and on my belt loops when I am at work. Besides the usual wallet and smartphone, I also carry car keys, forklift keys, a Leatherman Charge Plus multitool, a pocket organizer with various small tools and accessories, hearing protection, a ballpoint pen, a felt marker, folded-up emails and truck manifest printouts that inevitably accumulate over the course of a shift, work gloves on a carabiner, a Motorola two-way radio on a belt clip, and a belt-mounted trauma kit (I am the senior industrial/occupational first aid responder at my workplace). It all adds up in weight and bulk, so a significantly smaller and lighter version of the Yojimbo 2 that retains most of its functional ergonomics is something that definitely has a place in my work knife rotation.
I also regularly carry the Yojimbo 2 as my folding knife outside of work, but there are certain situations where I do need to carry something lighter and less bulky in the pocket. I spend a lot of my free time trail running, and the Yojimbo 2 isn’t particularly suited to being clipped to the types of pockets found in running shorts or running tights—in these instances, I usually carry a Delica 4 or Native 5 Lightweight, or even something smaller like a Dragonfly 2 or a Ladybug 3. The MicroJimbo, despite weighing a fraction of an ounce more than a Delica 4 or Native 5 Lightweight, is still light enough that it doesn’t flop around while clipped to my running shorts pocket, and it is small enough that it actually fits in the back pockets of my running tights.
- MicroJimbo alongside the Lil' Native & Dragonfly 2
After three weeks of using the MicroJimbo as my primary warehouse work knife, I can say with full confidence that it retains many of the Yojimbo 2’s most salient functional and ergonomic qualities and is a worthy addition to Spyderco’s catalogue of “little big knives” (i.e., compact folders that handle like much bigger knives) that includes models such as the industrial design masterpiece that is the Dragonfly 2 and the miniature workhorse that is the Lil’ Native. For the user who already likes the Yojimbo 2 but wants a version that carries smaller and lighter in the pocket, the MicroJimbo definitely fits the bill. For users with smaller hands who find the Yojimbo 2 too large to grip comfortably for extended periods, the MicroJimbo offers a chance to experience the design in a more compact form factor. And for users who want a version of the Yojimbo 2 that can be used in jurisdictions that restrict the carry of folding knives to those with blades less than 2.5” long, the MicroJimbo offers a legally-compliant blade and a more affordable alternative to the ChicagoJimbo.
Ultimately, I think it is the adherence to the Yojimbo design language that is the MicroJimbo’s strongest selling point and perhaps somewhat ironically, it is probably what is most likely to limit its appeal (i.e., if you don’t like the Yojimbo 2 for reasons other than it being too large for your hands, you probably won’t like the MicroJimbo, either).
- The Yojimbo 2 family of knives
. I think this one may be as well, as I now feel I should have a full size Yojimbo.