Aluminum or Magnesium Backspacers, Liners?

Discuss Spyderco's products and history.
User avatar
Bolster
Member
Posts: 5638
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: CalyFRNia

Aluminum or Magnesium Backspacers, Liners?

#1

Post by Bolster »

What is the reason that aluminum or magnesium backspacers are not prevalent? Is the purpose of a solid steel backspacer to move the balance of the knife to the rear? To give the knife more overall heft? Would aluminum or magnesium be too flimsy to hold a lockback spring...but how could it, G-10 and FRCP backspacers exist.

While we're on the topic, has Spyderco ever made a knife with aluminum or magnesium liners?
Steel novice who self-identifies as a steel expert. Proud M.N.O.S.D. member 0003. Spydie Steels: 4V, 15V, 20CV, AEB-L, AUS6, Cru-Wear, HAP40, K294, K390, M4, Magnacut, S110V, S30V, S35VN, S45VN, SPY27, SRS13, T15, VG10, XHP, ZWear, ZDP189
cjk
Member
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2021 10:51 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Aluminum or Magnesium Backspacers, Liners?

#2

Post by cjk »

The OG military had an aluminum backspacer.
User avatar
u.w.
Member
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 7:25 am
Location: VABch

Re: Aluminum or Magnesium Backspacers, Liners?

#3

Post by u.w. »

Magnesium is VERY prone to corrosion, so there's that...

Aluminum though, some 7075 T6 (very hard stuff, relatively speaking) might work well.

u.w.
JRinFL
Member
Posts: 6147
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:30 am
Location: Unfashionable West End of the Galaxy (SE USA)

Re: Aluminum or Magnesium Backspacers, Liners?

#4

Post by JRinFL »

There was a Police version that used aluminum for the handle and a few other models had aluminum versions as well. I don’t recall Spyderco using it for liners in any models, but I could be wrong.

Cold Steel has used aluminum liners in several models. I don’t know why Spyderco didn’t use aluminum liners or why they stopped making aluminum handled models for the most part. I know they made those exclusive PM2s not too long ago.
"...it costs nothing to be polite." - Winston Churchill
“Maybe the cheese in the mousetrap is an artificially created cheaper price?” -Sal
Friends call me Jim. As do my foes.
M.N.O.S.D. 0001
yablanowitz
Member
Posts: 6911
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Liberal, Kansas

Re: Aluminum or Magnesium Backspacers, Liners?

#5

Post by yablanowitz »

Maybe because people insist on taking their knives apart. Aluminum and magnesium threads strip out much more readily than steel, especially when the users think torque specifications are a myth.
User avatar
Bolster
Member
Posts: 5638
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: CalyFRNia

Re: Aluminum or Magnesium Backspacers, Liners?

#6

Post by Bolster »

yablanowitz wrote:
Sat Dec 03, 2022 10:34 pm
Maybe because people insist on taking their knives apart. Aluminum and magnesium threads strip out much more readily than steel, especially when the users think torque specifications are a myth.

And the clip screws do screw into liners on many models, good point. But how do we explain G-10 and plastic backspacers.
Steel novice who self-identifies as a steel expert. Proud M.N.O.S.D. member 0003. Spydie Steels: 4V, 15V, 20CV, AEB-L, AUS6, Cru-Wear, HAP40, K294, K390, M4, Magnacut, S110V, S30V, S35VN, S45VN, SPY27, SRS13, T15, VG10, XHP, ZWear, ZDP189
User avatar
RustyIron
Member
Posts: 2412
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2019 9:01 pm
Location: La Habra, CA
Contact:

Re: Aluminum or Magnesium Backspacers, Liners?

#7

Post by RustyIron »


I think there are two reasons for not using aluminum or magnesium:

1. They don't offer any benefits over the existing materials.

2. It's aesthetically distasteful to build something out of one material, and have one mismatched part. Gross.


🤢
User avatar
Fireman
Member
Posts: 2644
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2020 12:18 am

Re: Aluminum or Magnesium Backspacers, Liners?

#8

Post by Fireman »

I want titanium liners. It’s party cost I think. Sometimes the metal back spacer can aid in balancing the knife
:winking-tongue Mule Team Army 001
MNOSD 008 :usflag
Image Stable Mules; Z-Max, Z-Wear, Magna Cut, SRS13, Rex 76, Rex T15.
StuntZombie
Member
Posts: 1560
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:57 am
Location: ESVA
Contact:

Re: Aluminum or Magnesium Backspacers, Liners?

#9

Post by StuntZombie »

cjk wrote:
Sat Dec 03, 2022 8:52 pm
The OG military had an aluminum backspacer.
Was it? I was under the impression that it was polymer or G10. Pretty sure that's what mine was at least.

Some folks have mentioned aluminum not doing well when threaded, but I also think that aluminum liners might not have the tensile strength of steel or titanium. Maybe that's why it can be used as scales, but not liners. Just a guess.
Chris

Haves: Lava, Delica 4 Sante Fe Stoneworks, Spy-DK x2,

Just say NO to lined FRN
User avatar
Bolster
Member
Posts: 5638
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: CalyFRNia

Re: Aluminum or Magnesium Backspacers, Liners?

#10

Post by Bolster »

RustyIron wrote:
Sat Dec 03, 2022 11:53 pm
...1. They don't offer any benefits over the existing materials.
2. It's aesthetically distasteful to build something out of one material, and have one mismatched part...

1. Light weight, if compared to steel. I'm looking at a Native Chief backspacer thinking "That's one big hunk of steel."
2. While it's not uncommon for a knife to be built of several different materials, I suppose there could be an aesthetic component if the aluminum or magnesium weren't anodized.

I wonder if an aluminum backspacer would wear a lot faster; but then again, wouldn't G-10 and plastic, and they are sometimes used for backspacer material also.
Steel novice who self-identifies as a steel expert. Proud M.N.O.S.D. member 0003. Spydie Steels: 4V, 15V, 20CV, AEB-L, AUS6, Cru-Wear, HAP40, K294, K390, M4, Magnacut, S110V, S30V, S35VN, S45VN, SPY27, SRS13, T15, VG10, XHP, ZWear, ZDP189
User avatar
Ramonade
Member
Posts: 3107
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2021 3:45 pm
Location: NE France

Re: Aluminum or Magnesium Backspacers, Liners?

#11

Post by Ramonade »

Most backspacers are just here to fill space.
When the backspacer is actually needed for structural integrity, we often see it made from steel or titanium.

However, G10 is a material that can resist a LOT. Certainly more than aluminium in many categories of impact, torsion or pressure.
:respect In the collection :respect : Lots of different steels, in lots of different (and same) Spydercos.

Robin. Finally made an IG : ramo_knives

MNOSD member 004* aka Mr. N5s :face-clouds
User avatar
phaust
Member
Posts: 1134
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 6:20 pm

Re: Aluminum or Magnesium Backspacers, Liners?

#12

Post by phaust »

StuntZombie wrote:
Sun Dec 04, 2022 9:21 am
cjk wrote:
Sat Dec 03, 2022 8:52 pm
The OG military had an aluminum backspacer.
Was it? I was under the impression that it was polymer or G10. Pretty sure that's what mine was at least.
Before switching to standoffs, the backspacer was delrin for a bit (that's probably what yours was) and aluminum after that.
yablanowitz
Member
Posts: 6911
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Liberal, Kansas

Re: Aluminum or Magnesium Backspacers, Liners?

#13

Post by yablanowitz »

There is also a matter of galvanic corrosion to consider. If the spacer is also functioning as a spring holder, such as on a lockback, having the steel spring in direct contact with a dissimilar metal can cause unwanted reactions.
User avatar
vandelay
Member
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2022 9:00 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Aluminum or Magnesium Backspacers, Liners?

#14

Post by vandelay »

I'd guess a reason for not using aluminum liners is because screws strip out of aluminum much more easily than steel. I'm not sure if that'd be a problem in a backspacer though.
JRinFL wrote:
Sat Dec 03, 2022 10:10 pm
I don’t know why Spyderco didn’t use aluminum liners or why they stopped making aluminum handled models for the most part.
Aluminum handles are slippery unless they're textured very aggressively and they aren't fun in cold weather. Anodized aluminum also looks pretty bad once you beat it up a bit. I'd imagine G10 just sells better because of that.
Post Reply