Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

Discuss Spyderco's products and history.
User avatar
Doc Dan
Member
Posts: 14834
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:25 am
Location: In a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity.

Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#1

Post by Doc Dan »

We talk a lot about blade length and that is useful. However, we have not talked about cutting edge length in a thread in a while. There are some instances where blade length could be more important and that is certainly what the law looks at when deciding legality. However, the cutting edge is what does the job. Cutting edge length is sometimes surprising, too.
Image

Image

Image

Image

Here we can see the Manbug lined up cutting edge to cutting edge and not blade length. We can see that it has nearly as much cutting edge as a Dragonfly and a Lil Native. Also, there is not a whole lot of difference between it and the older Urban Lightweight (the new one is about the same as the Lil Native).

Image

Of course the Manbug's edge length is outclassed by the much larger Delica.

Image

The older K390 Urban Lightweight has an edge that compares pretty well to the Delica even though its blade is shorter. The Delica is still longer, but the knife is longer too.

Image

The cutting edge on the Delica is outclassed by the much larger Endura, as you'd expect. However...

Image


The Endura has nearly as much cutting edge as the larger Military. This is surprising. The Endura is more pocket friendly and less bulky and is still very capable.

Blade length is not the only thing. The business portion of the blade is more important, I think. Yes, there are times when a blade is too short for the task at hand. For example, a really large pumpkin is better carved with a Delica than a Manbug. But most cutting can be done with a smaller knife than people realize. The only thing there is that a good handle is very important, all too often. Still, the cutting edge rules most of the time.
I Pray Heaven to Bestow The Best of Blessing on THIS HOUSE, and on ALL that shall hereafter Inhabit it. May none but Honest and Wise Men ever rule under This Roof! (John Adams regarding the White House)

Follow the Christ, the King,
Live pure, speak true, right wrong, follow the King--
Else, wherefore born?" (Tennyson)



NRA Life Member
Spydernation 0050
User avatar
VooDooChild
Member
Posts: 2623
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2018 1:29 am

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#2

Post by VooDooChild »

The spydiechef and stretch 1 have a lot of cutting edge for their blade length.

Im at the point where I dont invest any concern over the "specs" anymore. If it works I use it.
"Rome's greatest contribution to mathematics was the killing of Archimedes."
User avatar
TkoK83Spy
Member
Posts: 12464
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2018 5:32 pm
Location: Syracuse, NY

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#3

Post by TkoK83Spy »

VooDooChild wrote:
Thu Sep 30, 2021 9:39 am
Im at the point where I dont invest any concern over the "specs" anymore. If it works I use it.
I'm in the same boat, I've never paid attention to how much a knife weighs, or what the exact cutting edge length is, or length of the knife itself. As long as it appeals to me and feels good in hand, it's good to me. The Manix is my favorite knife I couldn't tell you the answer to any of those 3 things haha!
15 :bug-red 's in 10 different steels
1 - Bradford Guardian 3 / Vanadis 4E Wharnie
1 - Monterey Bay Knives Slayback Flipper / ZDP 189
1 - CRK Small Sebenza 31/Macassar Ebony Inlays
1 - CRK Large Inkosi Insingo/ Black Micarta Inlays
1 - CRK Small Sebenza 31 Insingo/Magnacut

-Rick
aicolainen
Member
Posts: 1800
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2019 4:08 am
Location: Norway

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#4

Post by aicolainen »

I don't obsess over these things any longer, but I don't neglect it either.

On some folders I like as much blade and edge as possible for its handle size, this is typically larger size folders that I want to use for food prep while hiking or camping.

It's also the case that I like mid-sized to smaller folders, not because I don't like longer blades or edges or that there are legal restrictions, but they usually fit my narrow hand better, so I usually prefer that the available space in the handle is utilized well to give me as much knife as possible in that small package. I really like the Chaparral in that regard.
Regarding the Manbug having similar edge length to the DF2, that's not really surprising when one compare the designs. And it's a great comparison that highlights how good Spyderco is at providing options. You can get a knife in a small an light package that has just enough blade and prioritizes grip, or you can get a knife in a very small and light package that has just enough handle and prioritizes edge.
Now I would say even the DF2 blade/edge could be slightly longer, but we're not speaking about a whole lot more so it doesn't bother me. The HH Urban on the other hand is one that annoys me. Not because it's bad, but I can't use it without wondering how it would have been with a longer blade.
User avatar
Doc Dan
Member
Posts: 14834
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:25 am
Location: In a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity.

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#5

Post by Doc Dan »

Specs are specs, but the issue is cutting edge versus blade length. Some knives are more efficient in that regard than others. Knives with choils tend to have less cutting edge than knives without, but not always.
I Pray Heaven to Bestow The Best of Blessing on THIS HOUSE, and on ALL that shall hereafter Inhabit it. May none but Honest and Wise Men ever rule under This Roof! (John Adams regarding the White House)

Follow the Christ, the King,
Live pure, speak true, right wrong, follow the King--
Else, wherefore born?" (Tennyson)



NRA Life Member
Spydernation 0050
User avatar
Evil D
Member
Posts: 27147
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 9:48 pm
Location: Northern KY

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#6

Post by Evil D »

This is exactly the sort of stuff I love to obsess over, otherwise why would I even bother spending this kind of money on knives?


I do prefer larger knives no doubt, but I could get by with smaller knives up until either 1) blade length isn't long enough to accomplish a cut or 2) handle size and potentially overall strength of the knife aren't enough to use the knife hard enough to accomplish a cut. For example a lot of the stuff I do for work just can NOT be done with a Manbug/Ladybug mostly due to how small the handle is which limits how much force I can put through the knife. Hypothetically speaking if we had a knife that used a Ladybug blade in a Military handle with a Military size lock and pivot (or in other words a regular Military that has been sharpened down to a Ladybug sized blade) then yes I could do practically any task up until blade length becomes an issue (that knife wouldn't work for crap as a cake knife).

Specifically speaking on overall length vs edge length, this is another reason I've lost interest in choils/ricassos. It's just more efficient all around to have the max amount of cutting edge possible for a given blade length. Take the Mantra for example, it has darn near a Military size edge but in a Delica sized package. That's smart design IMO.
All SE all the time since 2017
~David
User avatar
Doc Dan
Member
Posts: 14834
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:25 am
Location: In a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity.

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#7

Post by Doc Dan »

Evil D wrote:
Fri Oct 01, 2021 7:04 am
This is exactly the sort of stuff I love to obsess over, otherwise why would I even bother spending this kind of money on knives?


I do prefer larger knives no doubt, but I could get by with smaller knives up until either 1) blade length isn't long enough to accomplish a cut or 2) handle size and potentially overall strength of the knife aren't enough to use the knife hard enough to accomplish a cut. For example a lot of the stuff I do for work just can NOT be done with a Manbug/Ladybug mostly due to how small the handle is which limits how much force I can put through the knife. Hypothetically speaking if we had a knife that used a Ladybug blade in a Military handle with a Military size lock and pivot (or in other words a regular Military that has been sharpened down to a Ladybug sized blade) then yes I could do practically any task up until blade length becomes an issue (that knife wouldn't work for crap as a cake knife).

Specifically speaking on overall length vs edge length, this is another reason I've lost interest in choils/ricassos. It's just more efficient all around to have the max amount of cutting edge possible for a given blade length. Take the Mantra for example, it has darn near a Military size edge but in a Delica sized package. That's smart design IMO.
Yes it is a smart design. This is a good reason to harp on Sal to get the leaf bladed Rockjumper out. That has an edge all the way to handle. An XL version would be even better.

Cutting edge rules, but sometimes I do need something longer or something easier to hold on to.
I Pray Heaven to Bestow The Best of Blessing on THIS HOUSE, and on ALL that shall hereafter Inhabit it. May none but Honest and Wise Men ever rule under This Roof! (John Adams regarding the White House)

Follow the Christ, the King,
Live pure, speak true, right wrong, follow the King--
Else, wherefore born?" (Tennyson)



NRA Life Member
Spydernation 0050
James Y
Member
Posts: 8078
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Southern CA

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#8

Post by James Y »

It’s probably hard to tell in this photo, but out of these three knives, the knife with the shortest blade and the shortest handle/overall length, the CRK Inkosi, actually has the longest cutting edge. Much has to do with its edge “belly.” The Para 3’s edge length is only a minuscule amount shorter. The shortest edge of the three is the Delica’s.

The edge length differences are easier to see when the knives are held two at a time, facing each other edge-to-edge.

Image

But TBH, for myself, the most important thing is how a knife feels and works for ME, more than getting the most edge length as possible out of a blade.

Jim
JRinFL
Member
Posts: 6147
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:30 am
Location: Unfashionable West End of the Galaxy (SE USA)

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#9

Post by JRinFL »

I guess it’s good that hammers and axes don’t get measured like knives do these days. Look at their work surface to handle ratio!

The handle is your primary interface with any knife and it should rarely, if ever, take second place to edge ratio. Sal gets it, many don’t. Wood carving knives take things to the extreme with hand filling handles and tiny blades. I doubt many wood carvers would want it any other way.

Edited to add: The choil, while part of the blade steel, could and I think should be considered part of the handle. They allow for what is essentially a longer handle that folds along with the blade.
"...it costs nothing to be polite." - Winston Churchill
“Maybe the cheese in the mousetrap is an artificially created cheaper price?” -Sal
Friends call me Jim. As do my foes.
M.N.O.S.D. 0001
James Y
Member
Posts: 8078
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Southern CA

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#10

Post by James Y »

JRinFL wrote:
Fri Oct 01, 2021 3:48 pm
I guess it’s good that hammers and axes don’t get measured like knives do these days. Look at their work surface to handle ratio!

The handle is your primary interface with any knife and it should rarely, if ever, take second place to edge ratio. Sal gets it, many don’t. Wood carving knives take things to the extreme with hand filling handles and tiny blades. I doubt many wood carvers would want it any other way.

Edited to add: The choil, while part of the blade steel, could and I think should be considered part of the handle. They allow for what is essentially a longer handle that folds along with the blade.

I'm perfectly fine with handles being noticeably longer than blades in folding knives. I've used "traditional" pocketknives/ pen knives that have blades that are much shorter than the handles, especially the tiny pen blades. Also the sheepsfeet blades on stockman patterns. Longer handles provide better leverage when using small blades for precision work.

Jim
User avatar
ChrisinHove
Member
Posts: 4081
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 8:12 am
Location: 27.2046° N, 77.4977° E

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#11

Post by ChrisinHove »

Interesting thoughts.

Like JRinFL I consider the choil to be essentially part of a folding handle, particularly in models like the Brouwer, which is the smaller (edge) knife for large hands par excellence.
User avatar
Evil D
Member
Posts: 27147
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 9:48 pm
Location: Northern KY

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#12

Post by Evil D »

I know your point was more towards small knives being more capable than people realize but I thought these pics were relevant here too. We often think of certain knives as being really big or really small because of their overall size and seem to focus less on the actual business part of the knife which is the edge length.

This comparison of the Police 4 and Caribbean shows that even though the P4 is one of the biggest overall folders that Spyderco makes, it's really not much bigger in cutting edge than a Caribbean, which is around the same size as a Para 2 when folded up. So, you almost get Police 4 cutting edge in a Para 2 size package.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


This thread has made me want to get out my Mantra again.
All SE all the time since 2017
~David
User avatar
VooDooChild
Member
Posts: 2623
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2018 1:29 am

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#13

Post by VooDooChild »

Also I mentioned this in another similar thread but...

It will be pretty hard to beat a pizza cutter.
"Rome's greatest contribution to mathematics was the killing of Archimedes."
Bill1170
Member
Posts: 2785
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: San Diego North County

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#14

Post by Bill1170 »

Evil D wrote:
Fri Oct 01, 2021 7:04 am
This is exactly the sort of stuff I love to obsess over, otherwise why would I even bother spending this kind of money on knives?


I do prefer larger knives no doubt, but I could get by with smaller knives up until either 1) blade length isn't long enough to accomplish a cut or 2) handle size and potentially overall strength of the knife aren't enough to use the knife hard enough to accomplish a cut. For example a lot of the stuff I do for work just can NOT be done with a Manbug/Ladybug mostly due to how small the handle is which limits how much force I can put through the knife. Hypothetically speaking if we had a knife that used a Ladybug blade in a Military handle with a Military size lock and pivot (or in other words a regular Military that has been sharpened down to a Ladybug sized blade) then yes I could do practically any task up until blade length becomes an issue (that knife wouldn't work for crap as a cake knife).

Specifically speaking on overall length vs edge length, this is another reason I've lost interest in choils/ricassos. It's just more efficient all around to have the max amount of cutting edge possible for a given blade length. Take the Mantra for example, it has darn near a Military size edge but in a Delica sized package. That's smart design IMO.
I agree. This is what I love about my Caribbean, plenty of handle, plenty of edge, and edge clear to the handle.

On the Delica, the longer handle and sub-3” blade give good control and legality. I wouldn’t want a shorter handle.
Bill1170
Member
Posts: 2785
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: San Diego North County

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#15

Post by Bill1170 »

Sorry, double post.
User avatar
Wartstein
Member
Posts: 15218
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2018 10:06 am
Location: Salzburg, Austria, Europe

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#16

Post by Wartstein »

Evil D wrote:
Sat Oct 02, 2021 2:57 pm
I know your point was more towards small knives being more capable than people realize but I thought these pics were relevant here too. We often think of certain knives as being really big or really small because of their overall size and seem to focus less on the actual business part of the knife which is the edge length.

.....

I do focus a lot on edge length. For me the subjective size of a knife is defined by lets say 75% by its cutting edge length.

A longer edge has a lot of advantages and no disadvantages for me, and makes a folder clearly more versatile.
To mention just some:
- Easier to cut stuff with wider diameter (
- More efficient cutting motion (less "back and force" as with a shorter edge, more likely to be one drawing motion, less "running out of edge before running out of material", better in whittling and the like...)
- A longer edge will stay sharp longer
- And: After a lot of work more likely have some still sharp areas

Furthermore, if I want to SHORTEN the edge: No problem to pinch grip the blade, or, as I do, just choke up on the actual edge (very controversial topic here, I know)
But: I can´t make a given edge LONGER.

Of course there are still advantages in longer blades with relatively short edges (but also true for long blades with LONG edges)
- Reach
- More clearance for the fingers when cutting on a board
- Easier to keep the pivot area away from ",messy" stuff.

Said it before:
The Manix for example to me is a small knife with great grip options, but all the limitations a short edge just brings
While my S35VN Tenacious is a full sized EDC folder.

Speaking of the Tenacious: Comparing it to lets say a Para 3 is a bit like Caribbean vs PM2
- The Tenacious is just 2mm longer than a Para 3 when closed...
... but has the cutting edge of an Endura (or even more when calculating the more pronounced belly) - see pic below:
On top: Tenacious: Below: Endura...

Image
Top three going by pocket-time (update March 24):
- EDC: Endura thin red line ffg combo edge (VG10); Wayne Goddard PE (4V), Endela SE (VG10)
-Mountains/outdoors: Pac.Salt 1 SE (H1), Salt 2 SE (LC200N), and also Wayne Goddard PE (4V)
User avatar
cabfrank
Member
Posts: 2881
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 9:07 pm
Location: Northern California, USA, Earth

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#17

Post by cabfrank »

Great picture. I had not idea the Tenacious' blade was so close to Endura length.
JRinFL
Member
Posts: 6147
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:30 am
Location: Unfashionable West End of the Galaxy (SE USA)

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#18

Post by JRinFL »

These discussions allows seem to forget that Sal and Eric often design knives to meet certain blade length restrictions while avoiding a slavish devotion to the blade/handle ratio nonsense.
"...it costs nothing to be polite." - Winston Churchill
“Maybe the cheese in the mousetrap is an artificially created cheaper price?” -Sal
Friends call me Jim. As do my foes.
M.N.O.S.D. 0001
User avatar
JSumm
Member
Posts: 5769
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2021 7:59 pm
Location: North of Atlanta, GA USA

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#19

Post by JSumm »

Doc Dan wrote:
Fri Oct 01, 2021 8:30 am

Yes it is a smart design. This is a good reason to harp on Sal to get the leaf bladed Rockjumper out. That has an edge all the way to handle. An XL version would be even better.

Cutting edge rules, but sometimes I do need something longer or something easier to hold on to.
Yes please on the leaf bladed Rock Jumper. And move that tip just a tad to the end of the handle. Lots of edge on that small knife.
- Jeff
May your feet be warm and dry and your throat warm with whiskey. A knife in hand or in the sock band.
MNOSD Member #0005
User avatar
VooDooChild
Member
Posts: 2623
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2018 1:29 am

Re: Let's talk about cutting edge vs blade length

#20

Post by VooDooChild »

Im going to mention the spydiechef again. I was looking at mine today and realised it has the same edge length as a pacific salt/ endura 4.
"Rome's greatest contribution to mathematics was the killing of Archimedes."
Post Reply