As evidenced in this thread, these types of subjective rankings and ratings probably do more harm than good. I have yet to find anyone come up with a subjective system that I find to be useful.
Personally, I think it would be in knife makers' interest to make objective, standardized test data available for the steels that they use, for example:
- Rockwell C Hardness
- Charpy V-Notch Impact Toughness or Single Edge Notch Bend Toughness
- CATRA Total Cards Cut
- General Weight Loss Corrosion (Distilled Water, Acetic Acid, Salt Water)
This would help address all of the subjective hearsay. Until this happens, Larrin's Knife Steel Nerds articles are probably the single best resource that is currently publicly available.
That being said, Larrin doesn't necessarily use the same: heat treatments, machining, and finishing that Spyderco uses. So, there is a limited amount of inference that can be made to actual production knives.
For those that care, using the HRC database on these forums along with Larrin's articles is currently the best means I have found for gauging the expected performance of different knife steels used in Spyderco knives.
In fact, Larrin actually has an article on H1 steel (
https://knifesteelnerds.com/2019/06/24/ ... -it-works/), which includes hardness measurements on an Spyderco H1 knife. Measured hardness on the Spyderco H1 knife was ~57 HRC, which is less than the hardness range for Hultafors carbon steel knife (58-60 HRC). So, it isn't surprising to me that someone who tolerates rust would prefer the carbon steel knife.