Did any of you pay $1K for a Forum knife?
- chuck_roxas45
- Member
- Posts: 8776
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:43 pm
- Location: Small City, Philippines
I bet that guy got two shills to bid for him to drive up the price. Next time he puts the knife on auction for $500, he'll get guys saying "oh man, what a bargain!". Could be well worth the ebay fees for that one fake auction.
http://uproxx.files.wordpress.com/2014/ ... ot-gif.gif" target="_blank
-
- Member
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 2:19 pm
- The Deacon
- Member
- Posts: 25717
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
- Location: Upstate SC, USA
- Contact:
And in this case there were three because, in order for the bid to have jumped from $851 to $1111, the guy whose bid shows as $851 actually bid one increment less than $1111.Fresh Eddie Fresh wrote:On Ebay you need two somebodies to get into a bidding war, so it is not just one person's opinion that the knife is worth that much.
But, unless he had a whole bunch of shills, that would make no sense, since he already had a high bid of $851 and bids well over $500 from at least 4 other bidders.chuck_roxas45 wrote:I bet that guy got two shills to bid for him to drive up the price. Next time he puts the knife on auction for $500, he'll get guys saying "oh man, what a bargain!". Could be well worth the ebay fees for that one fake auction.
Paul
My Personal Website ---- Beginners Guide to Spyderco Collecting ---- Spydiewiki
Deplorable :p
WTC # 1458 - 1504 - 1508 - Never Forget, Never Forgive!
My Personal Website ---- Beginners Guide to Spyderco Collecting ---- Spydiewiki
Deplorable :p
WTC # 1458 - 1504 - 1508 - Never Forget, Never Forgive!
- chuck_roxas45
- Member
- Posts: 8776
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:43 pm
- Location: Small City, Philippines
Well then, the price gougers triumph again. *shrugs*The Deacon wrote: But, unless he had a whole bunch of shills, that would make no sense, since he already had a high bid of $851 and bids well over $500 from at least 4 other bidders.
http://uproxx.files.wordpress.com/2014/ ... ot-gif.gif" target="_blank
- chuck_roxas45
- Member
- Posts: 8776
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:43 pm
- Location: Small City, Philippines
Here we go again. That's your opinion, this is mine. There's nothing you can say that will change my mind, and there's nothing I can say to change yours.akaAK wrote:Can't be considered price gouging when it is a public auction.
http://uproxx.files.wordpress.com/2014/ ... ot-gif.gif" target="_blank
The secondary market of a knife is always up for negotiation. There aren't any associations setting pricing similar to comic books or baseball cards. Given the rarity of some of these knives you can't even really set proper comparables. That doesn't say the general consensus of idiocy isn't up for debate.
Personally, I can't imagine paying $1,000 for a production knife no matter the rarity and materials. It would have to have insane levels of nostalgia or a personal connection to approach that. If it was crafted by elves and glows blue when trolls draw near perhaps but even that would be selectively useful. We are pretty good at spotting trolls around here without magic cutlery. :p
Personally, I can't imagine paying $1,000 for a production knife no matter the rarity and materials. It would have to have insane levels of nostalgia or a personal connection to approach that. If it was crafted by elves and glows blue when trolls draw near perhaps but even that would be selectively useful. We are pretty good at spotting trolls around here without magic cutlery. :p
Exactly my point.
My last discussion about this was pointless because people too easily label things incorrectly. An auction for a discretionary item (luxury, non-essential) cannot in any way be described as gouging. Incorrect use of the term.
Chuck - not trying to change your opinion, agree 100% with your right to express your opinion. Just want to point out that an opinion built on flawed concepts or definitions doesn't really contribute anything to the discussion. It is also very interesting that this is the exact same attitude (essentially the same comment) shown by someone I recently tried to have a discussion with. Interesting coincidence.
My last discussion about this was pointless because people too easily label things incorrectly. An auction for a discretionary item (luxury, non-essential) cannot in any way be described as gouging. Incorrect use of the term.
Chuck - not trying to change your opinion, agree 100% with your right to express your opinion. Just want to point out that an opinion built on flawed concepts or definitions doesn't really contribute anything to the discussion. It is also very interesting that this is the exact same attitude (essentially the same comment) shown by someone I recently tried to have a discussion with. Interesting coincidence.
- chuck_roxas45
- Member
- Posts: 8776
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:43 pm
- Location: Small City, Philippines
That the concept or definition is flawed is again only your opinion.akaAK wrote:Exactly my point.
My last discussion about this was pointless because people too easily label things incorrectly. An auction for a discretionary item (luxury, non-essential) cannot in any way be described as gouging. Incorrect use of the term.
Chuck - not trying to change your opinion, agree 100% with your right to express your opinion. Just want to point out that an opinion built on flawed concepts or definitions doesn't really contribute anything to the discussion. It is also very interesting that this is the exact same attitude (essentially the same comment) shown by someone I recently tried to have a discussion with. Interesting coincidence.
Noun 1. price gouging - pricing above the market price when no alternative retailer is available.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/price+gouging
price gouging
Definition
The act of retailers increasing prices when no alternative is available. For instance, many spectators believe that oil retailers participate in price gouging.
Read more: http://www.businessdictionary.com/defin ... z2YfFMfIHa
http://uproxx.files.wordpress.com/2014/ ... ot-gif.gif" target="_blank
- chuck_roxas45
- Member
- Posts: 8776
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:43 pm
- Location: Small City, Philippines
That's because there are no alternative sources. They can always sell it for a fair price in a BIN posting. :)gbelleh wrote:But the buyers are determining the price here, not the (lucky) seller.
The required starting bid was probably high enough already.
http://uproxx.files.wordpress.com/2014/ ... ot-gif.gif" target="_blank
Nice try Chuck. I'll go with the Oxford, Merriam Webster and MacMillan dictionaries. I try to base my opinions on solid foundations otherwise whats the point? As pointed out by others your definition does not fit when the buyers are establishing the price, wrong definition, but again, nice try.
Oxford Dictionaries
2 North American informal overcharge or swindle (someone):
drugs sold by the same manufacturers who are gouging patients in this country(gouge something out) obtain money by swindling or extortion:
McMillan Dictionary
2 Mainly American to make someone pay more money than they should
Merriam Webster
: an excessive or improper exaction : extortion
Oxford Dictionaries
2 North American informal overcharge or swindle (someone):
drugs sold by the same manufacturers who are gouging patients in this country(gouge something out) obtain money by swindling or extortion:
McMillan Dictionary
2 Mainly American to make someone pay more money than they should
Merriam Webster
: an excessive or improper exaction : extortion
- chuck_roxas45
- Member
- Posts: 8776
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:43 pm
- Location: Small City, Philippines
Again, it's your opinion. Doesn't make it more valid than mine. :DakaAK wrote:Nice try Chuck. I'll go with the Oxford, Merriam Webster and MacMillan dictionaries. I try to base my opinions on solid foundations otherwise whats the point? As pointed out by others your definition does not fit when the buyers are establishing the price, wrong definition, but again, nice try.
Oxford Dictionaries
2 North American informal overcharge or swindle (someone):
drugs sold by the same manufacturers who are gouging patients in this country(gouge something out) obtain money by swindling or extortion:
McMillan Dictionary
2 Mainly American to make someone pay more money than they should
Merriam Webster
: an excessive or improper exaction : extortion
Besides, take this one
2 North American informal overcharge or swindle (someone):<<Seems spot on with my definition too, although I don't know what drugs have to do with it. :D
And this one fits with my definition as well. : an excessive or improper exaction << extortion, OTOH is different.
I do agree with you. Your defintions are better and they support my argument that these are price gougers. :D
http://uproxx.files.wordpress.com/2014/ ... ot-gif.gif" target="_blank
- chuck_roxas45
- Member
- Posts: 8776
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:43 pm
- Location: Small City, Philippines
You can bring in your arguments, then I'll bring in mine. After a few pages of back and forth, we'll just be back where we started. :D
I can tell you right off, where not going to get anywhere. :D
How about we cut out the middle part(the back and forth part) and agree to disagree right here with no smart asides(like the part where you said my position was based on flawed definitions) and save the other forumites the vitriol that will surely come with the back and forth?
I can tell you right off, where not going to get anywhere. :D
How about we cut out the middle part(the back and forth part) and agree to disagree right here with no smart asides(like the part where you said my position was based on flawed definitions) and save the other forumites the vitriol that will surely come with the back and forth?
http://uproxx.files.wordpress.com/2014/ ... ot-gif.gif" target="_blank
Keep digging Chuck, eventually you will get out of that hole.
Both of those definitions provided do not refer to buyers setting the price at which they are willing to purchase an item. You are relying on the fact that the buyers are swindling or overcharging themselves. Wrong again.
The it establish once divided celebration forever. Look I have an opinion just by putting a bunch of words together with no context or relevant meaning.
Both of those definitions provided do not refer to buyers setting the price at which they are willing to purchase an item. You are relying on the fact that the buyers are swindling or overcharging themselves. Wrong again.
The it establish once divided celebration forever. Look I have an opinion just by putting a bunch of words together with no context or relevant meaning.
- CarbonFiberNut
- Member
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 1:40 pm
Man, I could sure go for a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. No bananas though - bananas ruin a perfectly good PB&J.
◊ Manix 2 XL ◊ Manix 2 lightweight blue ◊ Caly 3 carbon fiber ◊ Caly 3 damascus / CF ◊ Lum Chinese Nishijin ◊ Sage 1 ◊ Superleaf
◊ Dragonfly FRN serrated ◊ Endura Gen 1 ◊ Rescue Gen 1 ◊ Endura 4 FFG ◊ Delica 4 half serrated ◊ Mule Team ◊ Spin ◊ Bushcraft UK
◊ S110V Forum Native 5 ◊ Black Nishijin Cricket
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Top 5 most wanted: Domino, Dice, CF Para-2, CF Cricket. Seeing a theme here?
◊ Dragonfly FRN serrated ◊ Endura Gen 1 ◊ Rescue Gen 1 ◊ Endura 4 FFG ◊ Delica 4 half serrated ◊ Mule Team ◊ Spin ◊ Bushcraft UK
◊ S110V Forum Native 5 ◊ Black Nishijin Cricket
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Top 5 most wanted: Domino, Dice, CF Para-2, CF Cricket. Seeing a theme here?
- chuck_roxas45
- Member
- Posts: 8776
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:43 pm
- Location: Small City, Philippines
I can see that you don't want to end the argument on a friendly agree to disagree. You still keep trying to sneak in the odd snarky comment. :DakaAK wrote:Keep digging Chuck, eventually you will get out of that hole.
Both of those definitions provided do not refer to buyers setting the price at which they are willing to purchase an item. You are relying on the fact that the buyers are swindling or overcharging themselves. Wrong again.
The it establish once divided celebration forever. Look I have an opinion just by putting a bunch of words together with no context or relevant meaning.
I guess that's what some people do when they get frustrated. :p
You keep trying to make up excuses for the price gougers, you wouldn't be one of them would you?
http://uproxx.files.wordpress.com/2014/ ... ot-gif.gif" target="_blank
- The Deacon
- Member
- Posts: 25717
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
- Location: Upstate SC, USA
- Contact:
So you are saying that any auction for an out of production knife that closes at a price higher than what you personally consider to be "fair", is an example of price gouging? As you said, you're entitled to your opinion. Just not sure how many will share it.chuck_roxas45 wrote:That's because there are no alternative sources. They can always sell it for a fair price in a BIN posting. :)
Wrong. The starting bid was $99, with no reserve. So the seller was risking the possibility of "giving away" a knife that most collectors would agree is worth considerably more than that. IIRC, I paid around $300 for mine, and have watched several sell for over $400 in the past few years.chuck_roxas45 wrote:The required starting bid was probably high enough already.
Paul
My Personal Website ---- Beginners Guide to Spyderco Collecting ---- Spydiewiki
Deplorable :p
WTC # 1458 - 1504 - 1508 - Never Forget, Never Forgive!
My Personal Website ---- Beginners Guide to Spyderco Collecting ---- Spydiewiki
Deplorable :p
WTC # 1458 - 1504 - 1508 - Never Forget, Never Forgive!