Revisiting the S35VN question.......
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 4:42 pm
I don't mean to stir up trouble, but on the other hand, maybe that's exactly what I mean to do. :cool:
Once again, I'm sitting here perusing the interwebz,sipping a couple post-work beverages, in fact scrolling back through this forums archives, when I stumble onto a thread about the future of S30V. I then read several posts from our own Ankerson,the same forum guru who recently put to rest most of our qualms concerning S35VN,yet I'm having a difficult time reconcilling his recent test results with his earlier statements.
After the s***-storm that ensued after CrimsonTide's test videos of his Native 5 with S35VN steel, Jim conducted yet another exhaustive test, and in is conclusion,stated :
But then, I stumble onto the following statements,that simply have me scratching my head, as they can't seem to be reconciled with the above conclusion.
So, as Rod Serling used to say,"Submitted for your approval......"
I don't recall hearing mentioned where the Native 5 being tested actually came from. Of course, I don't know diddly, but I suspected it may have been sent by Spyderco, along with a request for this test, in order to quench the flames created by Crimson's tests.
At the very least, one must admit, this drastic 180-degree turn-around is curious,especially after a single series of tests.
And for the record, I'm NOT intending to bash Spyderco or Ankerson, but this is clearly a legitimate question that deserves further scrutiny. I'd like to hear some specifics from Ankerson on this turn-about.
( Rant over.......flame away :D )
Once again, I'm sitting here perusing the interwebz,sipping a couple post-work beverages, in fact scrolling back through this forums archives, when I stumble onto a thread about the future of S30V. I then read several posts from our own Ankerson,the same forum guru who recently put to rest most of our qualms concerning S35VN,yet I'm having a difficult time reconcilling his recent test results with his earlier statements.
After the s***-storm that ensued after CrimsonTide's test videos of his Native 5 with S35VN steel, Jim conducted yet another exhaustive test, and in is conclusion,stated :
Now, I'd previously read a few of his negative comments concerning this steel, and thought this turn-about was curious, but I decided keep my N5 rather than return it, as I was considering,largely based on this report.Ankerson wrote: The Native 5 performed extremely well and S35VN seems to be a very good steel based on my testing, Spyderco did an excellent job with it. With all the questions about S35VN lately all I can say is it performed well in my testing of the Native 5 and it and the NAtive 5 is highly recommended by me.
But then, I stumble onto the following statements,that simply have me scratching my head, as they can't seem to be reconciled with the above conclusion.
So, as Rod Serling used to say,"Submitted for your approval......"
Ankerson wrote: S35VN just ain't it IMO......
Ankerson wrote:For the end users, no benifets over S30V except easier to sharpen.
All I can say in the end is don't pass up a knife in S30V because S35VN is coming.
Ankerson wrote:Other than one manufacturer that was involved in the development of S35VN for ease of manufacturing over S30V......
IMO that will prove to have been a mistake in the end I believe.
Bookmark this thread for future reference.....
Ankerson wrote:Yeah I know.
S35VN rolls and flattens way to easy compared to S30V. (My main gripe)
I think Crucible went too far in the other direction.
I think S35VN needs to be a lot harder from what I have seen, like 2 points or so, but I don't know if it can be taken to that hardness production wise.
There needs to be a hardness increase to offset the rolling and flattening, I would say at the min 61 HRC, but I don't know for sure.
And finally, and a bit paradoxically :Ankerson wrote:The Mule and one model so far.
I would love to hear that too, that would be fly on the wall stuff there.
I won't be getting anymore knives in S35VN until the rolling issues are resolved.
Ankerson wrote:
If the results don't make since in the end then there is a problem with the test, the method and or the variables.
When I do my testing I try and be as accurate as I can be and I have no agenda other than the accuracy of my testing and I want my data to be accurate. In the end I don't care what the results are, they are what they are and I just write down the data. I have much more integrity than some do and I really want good data to be out there. While i am not perfect it is as good as I can make it and I stand by my results.......
I don't recall hearing mentioned where the Native 5 being tested actually came from. Of course, I don't know diddly, but I suspected it may have been sent by Spyderco, along with a request for this test, in order to quench the flames created by Crimson's tests.
At the very least, one must admit, this drastic 180-degree turn-around is curious,especially after a single series of tests.
And for the record, I'm NOT intending to bash Spyderco or Ankerson, but this is clearly a legitimate question that deserves further scrutiny. I'd like to hear some specifics from Ankerson on this turn-about.
( Rant over.......flame away :D )