RIL Military (Knifeworks LE) or Standard Military
RIL Military (Knifeworks LE) or Standard Military
Ok guys. I have the LE RIL Military on pre-order at Knifeworks. I am trying to decide which Milli to go with. I do not mind the LL or the FL. Which one is going to be stronger? I understand the standard LL is very strong on the Milli, and is one of the strongest in the industry. I read Sal was saying it could withstand 500 lbs of force. That's pretty impressive. Does anyone know how much force the RIL version can withstand. Logically I would think the RIL would stronger because of the thickness difference.
What are some other pros and cons of each? I'm not too concerned about the different steels. I have expierence with both the CPM-M4 and CPM-S30V. IMO they are both good steels.
Brad
What are some other pros and cons of each? I'm not too concerned about the different steels. I have expierence with both the CPM-M4 and CPM-S30V. IMO they are both good steels.
Brad
-
- Member
- Posts: 7257
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Liberal, Kansas
Just so you will know, the cutout at the base of the lockbar on the TiRIL Military measures 0.048" thick. The liner/lockbar on the regular Military measures 0.048" thick. One is titanium, one is steel. Guess which is likely to be stronger. 
The old 440V Millie with one partial liner was strong enough to stand up to anything someone with two active brain cells is likely to dish out. Any of the others will be as well. Choose by steel and handle preference.

The old 440V Millie with one partial liner was strong enough to stand up to anything someone with two active brain cells is likely to dish out. Any of the others will be as well. Choose by steel and handle preference.
I don't believe in safe queens, only in pre-need replacements.
That's the cutout. I've seen lots of "Hard Use" knives with RIL posted by STR to have cutouts as thin as .032" or so. I believe Sal said the RIL Millie was being engineered for the same strength as the liner lock Millie, so maybe the cutout being a similar size in a weaker material would make for a similar strength lock due the the rest of the lock bar being thicker and the possibly having to do with where the cutout is placed rather than just having the cutout thickness limiting strength to what an equivilant thickness liner lock would be. STR, or better yet Spyderco's lock breaking machine could probably answer that question. I do find it humorous though when I see so many people claim the RIL is by far the strongest lock on the market. The Chinnok lock back, Manix 2 Caged Ball Lock, the Superhawk and Para's comp lock, and the Axis lock should crush most any RIL for ultimate strength. The new Bradley M4 folder and it's .072" thick liner lock should beat out most RIL's as well, as that is one beefy hunk of stainless steel locking up that M4 blade.jzmtl wrote:That sounds awfully thin for a frame lock. :confused:
Mike
- The Deacon
- Member
- Posts: 25717
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
- Location: Upstate SC, USA
- Contact:
Granted, the last time I was in a physics classroom was **** near 50 years ago, but it does seem a bar .048 thick for its entire several inches of length would be easier to flex than a bar of equal length several times that thickness for all but a very short section of that length.
That said, I'd most definitely agree with this...
That said, I'd most definitely agree with this...
yablanowitz wrote:The old 440V Millie with one partial liner was strong enough to stand up to anything someone with two active brain cells is likely to dish out. Any of the others will be as well. Choose by steel and handle preference.
Paul
My Personal Website ---- Beginners Guide to Spyderco Collecting ---- Spydiewiki
Deplorable :p
WTC # 1458 - 1504 - 1508 - Never Forget, Never Forgive!
My Personal Website ---- Beginners Guide to Spyderco Collecting ---- Spydiewiki
Deplorable :p
WTC # 1458 - 1504 - 1508 - Never Forget, Never Forgive!
-
- Member
- Posts: 7257
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Liberal, Kansas
-
- Member
- Posts: 7257
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Liberal, Kansas
It depends on your definition of "ordinary use". For my ordinary use, the lock is pretty much superfluous. I use slipjoints all the time. For others, ordinary use seems to require a locking mechanism that is stronger than the blade. Why? No real clue, and the only reasons I can think of tend to be...let's just say "uncomplimentary" and leave it at that. 

I don't believe in safe queens, only in pre-need replacements.
Cutting thick cardboard your blade gets jammed in all the time. While wiggling it out you don't particularly care what angles pressure is being applied, you just want to finish cutting the cardboard.
This is one of the more common places where you'll see lock failure, I've heard of locks failing on something as simple as chopping twigs though.
This is one of the more common places where you'll see lock failure, I've heard of locks failing on something as simple as chopping twigs though.
Cannot Die Happy Without The Maxamet Yojumbo
-
- Member
- Posts: 7257
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Liberal, Kansas
After you cut yourself enough times, you begin to care.Joshua J. wrote:Cutting thick cardboard your blade gets jammed in all the time. While wiggling it out you don't particularly care what angles pressure is being applied, you just want to finish cutting the cardboard.
This is one of the more common places where you'll see lock failure, I've heard of locks failing on something as simple as chopping twigs though.
I don't believe in safe queens, only in pre-need replacements.