book survey
- druid
- Member
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
- Location: The western edge of north America
book survey
not to be too pessimistic, I think we are slipping into an age of supposedly educated. functional illiterates. and maybe they'll be able to spell well enough to send text messages. but actually reading novels, is becoming an increasing rarity. I've heard in believe that most people read less than one book per year. I've talked to many people of normal intelligence that have to think back a couple years if you ask them what the last book I read was. It seems that we on this forum might not fall into this category, we shall see.
within the scientific boundaries prescribed by people who answer a book survey, more likely readers for not I would think.
within the scientific boundaries prescribed by people who answer a book survey, more likely readers for not I would think.
why
#2432
#2432
-
- Member
- Posts: 6910
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Liberal, Kansas
- smcfalls13
- Member
- Posts: 7218
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 12:09 pm
- Location: Reisterstown, MD, USA, Earth
- vampyrewolf
- Member
- Posts: 7486
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
- Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
I've usually got 2-3 books on the go at a time... more if you include magazines.
Currently working on political philosophy, orwell's 1984, and the latest copy of linux format. Probably have 1984 done by the weekend, only about 1/4 through the philosophy book in 2 weeks so far.
Currently working on political philosophy, orwell's 1984, and the latest copy of linux format. Probably have 1984 done by the weekend, only about 1/4 through the philosophy book in 2 weeks so far.
Coffee before Conciousness
Why do people worry more if you argue with your voices than if you just talk with them? What about if you lose those arguements?
Slowly going crazy at work... they found a way to make the voices work too.
Why do people worry more if you argue with your voices than if you just talk with them? What about if you lose those arguements?
Slowly going crazy at work... they found a way to make the voices work too.
- SoCal Operator
- Member
- Posts: 1372
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 6:28 pm
- Location: 36.99769 -122.06588
- Fred Sanford
- Member
- Posts: 5734
- Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:41 pm
- Location: Ohio, USA
I used to read here and there but after having a child (who is now 4) I don't read at all, unless it's a magazine or a certification book for something Microsoft or Cisco related.
Your poll needs another answer for people like me:
* I read occasionally, about a book every few years. :)
Your poll needs another answer for people like me:
* I read occasionally, about a book every few years. :)
"I'm calling YOU ugly, I could push your face in some dough and make gorilla cookies." - Fred Sanford
My 2 cents on the issue:
I had to read such stupid crap in school that I was turned off of books. In my days at middle and high school, less than 10% of our assigned readings were interesting. On top of this, I was always "wrong" in my interpretations in English class. As a result, I (foolishly) decided that if I am going to misinterpret everything I read, I shouldn't bother reading. And I didn't all through high school.
We read classics in school, which I guess was good, but I honestly think it was too early for most of us (definitely too early for me). In high school, we should have been guided in our reading choices, not forced. Ideally, the first few weeks, the teacher talks with each student and figures out what kind of books they will like and makes some suggestions.
Now, about 2 years later, I am in college and steering clear of non-required English classes (especially Shakespeare). I am starting to read true literature and I actually enjoy what I read.
It is a crime to force a 16 year old to read and understand "A Tale of Two Cities" :D
I had to read such stupid crap in school that I was turned off of books. In my days at middle and high school, less than 10% of our assigned readings were interesting. On top of this, I was always "wrong" in my interpretations in English class. As a result, I (foolishly) decided that if I am going to misinterpret everything I read, I shouldn't bother reading. And I didn't all through high school.
We read classics in school, which I guess was good, but I honestly think it was too early for most of us (definitely too early for me). In high school, we should have been guided in our reading choices, not forced. Ideally, the first few weeks, the teacher talks with each student and figures out what kind of books they will like and makes some suggestions.
Now, about 2 years later, I am in college and steering clear of non-required English classes (especially Shakespeare). I am starting to read true literature and I actually enjoy what I read.
It is a crime to force a 16 year old to read and understand "A Tale of Two Cities" :D
- Harry White
- Member
- Posts: 1362
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 7:20 pm
- Location: New Jersey, USA
reading and book collecting are my favorite pastimes, even moreso than knife collecting. some of my favorite authors include john fowles, john hawkes, will christopher baer, craig clevenger, norman mailer, jim thompson, rupert thomson, steve erickson, fyodor dostoyevsky, paul auster, vladimir nabokov, james ellroy, and on and on...
i read every day, but slowly, averaging about two books per month.
i read every day, but slowly, averaging about two books per month.
Users: SS Police PE, Delica 4 PE, Kopa Cocobolo, Blue Dodo SE, Yellow Pacific Salt PE, Micarta SPOT SE, Gray Calypso Jr, Temperance SE, Burgandy Jess Horn w/ZDP, UK Penknife, BB Delica 3 PE, Captain, CF Military w/BG-42, Lava, Caly3 SE, Para-Military SE, Manix CE, BB Para-Military SE, Delica 4 Wave, Ocelot CE, SpyderFly, Navigator II SE, Vagabond, D'Allara Drop Point CE, Black Assist I, Bug Set (and also: Sharpmaker, SS byrd Finch PE, Profile Set, byrd Firebyrd, Large Spyderpac, byrd Wings)
druid wrote:not to be too pessimistic, I think we are slipping into an age of supposedly educated. functional illiterates. and maybe they'll be able to spell well enough to send text messages. but actually reading novels, is becoming an increasing rarity. I've heard in believe that most people read less than one book per year. I've talked to many people of normal intelligence that have to think back a couple years if you ask them what the last book I read was. It seems that we on this forum might not fall into this category, we shall see.
within the scientific boundaries prescribed by people who answer a book survey, more likely readers for not I would think.
I read strictly non-fiction, about 1-3+ books a month. For the record, I don't think consistently reading is necessarily indicative of intelligence. One of my favorite philosophers, Ralph Waldo Emerson, pointed out back in his day that people used books on a regular basis as a means of distraction much like TV is looked upon by people today. I also listen to quite a few books on tape or some form of educational audio series while driving and even then I've noticed at times that I was using the audios as a form of mental distraction.
I do however, understand your point and agree that some people who don't read tend to avoid education that's not mandatory by some authority outside of themselves.
Also "Kaizen1" on BF, "ignoramus" on CPF & EDCF. "kaizenrei" on KF, "Kaizen" on USN.
- druid
- Member
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
- Location: The western edge of north America
I understand your point and it has merit, however I believe reading anything even the popular fiction and science fiction that I read on a regular basis. Broadens your vocabulary, and opens you up to new ideas. on a book for about basis not the same as reading, classic philosophy, Russian novels, were serious historical pieces, but I believe it does have an impact, I also tend to spend a lot more time reading if I read something I enjoy. for everybody this will be different. I actually read more "intellectual" books in high school than I do now. not to blow my own horn. but I think an active mind can find a spark in modest stimulus. On the other hand I think watching TV, can actually be far worse. providing a moving image keep your eyes focused, when your mind is basically in a trance. My family especially my parents, read a lot of higher and intellectual novels, and historical works. to receive a certain amount of pressure to do the same. but generally do not. I would probably gain something from these, but I read what I enjoy, and enjoy it whether or not I always get something from it.Kaizen wrote:I read strictly non-fiction, about 1-3+ books a month. For the record, I don't think consistently reading is necessarily indicative of intelligence. One of my favorite philosophers, Ralph Waldo Emerson, pointed out back in his day that people used books on a regular basis as a means of distraction much like TV is looked upon by people today. I also listen to quite a few books on tape or some form of educational audio series while driving and even then I've noticed at times that I was using the audios as a form of mental distraction.
I do however, understand your point and agree that some people who don't read tend to avoid education that's not mandatory by some authority outside of themselves.
one thing I firmly believe though reading broadens your vocabulary, and we think in the words we know. therefore you might say that any reading, broadens your mind.
why
#2432
#2432
I agree, but not entirely. Certain comic books and novels, especially when read as a form of mental distraction, can add zero value in terms of intellectual stimulation. Hey, I'm sure we've all read pure garbage that we could've done better without while online. And certain televsion programs may very well be the stimulus to wake someone up to a new passion. So I do think you'll more likely find those positive stimuli through reading, I just think it's more about the content, context and timing for the individual as opposed to the avenue of how someone gets the info that brings value to the mind.druid wrote: one thing I firmly believe though reading broadens your vocabulary, and we think in the words we know. therefore you might say that any reading, broadens your mind.
Also "Kaizen1" on BF, "ignoramus" on CPF & EDCF. "kaizenrei" on KF, "Kaizen" on USN.
Pretty much all reading makes you think and improves concentration and vocabulary. There is a lot of fluff out there but even fluff has greater benefits than re-runs of Full House.
I've cut way back on my television watching. I have my digital recorder set for just two tv program and only watch one of those regularly. I work in a library so I always run across good titles and recommendations and therefore have both a stack of book and a to-read list waiting.
I've cut way back on my television watching. I have my digital recorder set for just two tv program and only watch one of those regularly. I work in a library so I always run across good titles and recommendations and therefore have both a stack of book and a to-read list waiting.
- CopilotATS-55
- Member
- Posts: 1149
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 5:40 pm
- Location: Plymouth, Ma