retro revolvers

If your topic has nothing to do with Spyderco, you can post it here.
cjgrad23
Member
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:12 am

retro revolvers

#1

Post by cjgrad23 »

If you are reading this thread first, read pullyallup's first cause it is WAY more important


OK - In the latest edition of American Handgunner - it was announced that at shot show smith and wesson are bringing back a gaggle of classic wheelguns!!! the 1917 45, the lemon squeezer, the 1955 target, and a few others - even a snubby .44 special!! all have the locks, but otherwise look original based on the few photos provided by the mag. ( no gold anniversy things, ect.) - saints be praised :D


Really really really want a 6 inch 1917 - maybe ill be good enough in time for x mas
User avatar
Dr. Snubnose
Member
Posts: 8799
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 9:54 pm
Location: NewYork

#2

Post by Dr. Snubnose »

cjgrad23 wrote:If you are reading this thread first, read pullyallup's first cause it is WAY more important


OK - In the latest edition of American Handgunner - it was announced that at shot show smith and wesson are bringing back a gaggle of classic wheelguns!!! the 1917 45, the lemon squeezer, the 1955 target, and a few others - even a snubby .44 special!! all have the locks, but otherwise look original based on the few photos provided by the mag. ( no gold anniversy things, ect.) - saints be praised :D


Really really really want a 6 inch 1917 - maybe ill be good enough in time for x mas


YAY!!!!!! :D Doc :D
"Always Judge a man by the way he treats someone who could be of no possible use to him"

*Custom Avatar with the Help of Daywalker*
User avatar
The Deacon
Member
Posts: 25717
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Upstate SC, USA
Contact:

#3

Post by The Deacon »

Please tell me the 38/44 Outdoorsman is among them.
Paul
My Personal Website ---- Beginners Guide to Spyderco Collecting ---- Spydiewiki
Deplorable :p
WTC # 1458 - 1504 - 1508 - Never Forget, Never Forgive!
matthewdanger
Member
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Indy IN USA

#4

Post by matthewdanger »

That's too bad about the locks.
WJR
Member
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:58 am
Location: Alabama

#5

Post by WJR »

matthewdanger wrote:That's too bad about the locks.
Agreed. The biggest mistake by far.

WJR
cjgrad23
Member
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:12 am

#6

Post by cjgrad23 »

Heres my thing with the lock - no,I dont like them, but many states REQUIRE them if the manufacturer wants that handgun sold in the state. I live in such a state, and if smith didnt put the locks in, I would not have access to any Smith that wasnt grandfathered in. In addition, Ruger, Springfield armory, and glocks here all have the internal lock too. Not because the consumer or company want to put it in, but because the state mandates it.

Personally, I dont see the big deal. its the size of a screw hole, not overly noticable, and, in my experience only, does not interfere with the functioning of the firearm. Ive put many hundreds of 357 and 38 through my 620 with zero problems. Again, I dont like why its there, but the lock itself doesnt bother me.
User avatar
Halfneck
Member
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 7:51 am
Location: Calhoun, Georgia.

#7

Post by Halfneck »

I'm glad to see S&W doing well, but I really hate the look of the lock. It has no impact on the functioning of the revolver to me, but I just can't get over the ugly looking little thing over the cylinder latch. I wish they had just coughed up some cash to Taurus and then put them on the hammer. Went shooting today with my old S&W 17-3. Beautiful pistol, and no lock.

Really kills me as I love the S&W 1917. Oh well, don't have the cash now anyway.
"A Delica is still a better weapon than a keyboard and a sour attitude..." Michael Janich
Post Reply