sal wrote: ↑Fri Mar 24, 2023 3:49 pm
Looks like we've got 2 conversations going on about AI? I would like to be educated on the mechanics of using AI for posts. Maybe a thread dedicated to AI mechanics? How does it work? How can we tell? Maybe it's just me, but I would feel deceived speaking with a bot. Like the movie "her". Who is behind the curtain?
sal
Yea, that's my bad. I saw that bot-ish post over in the Mule forum and cross posted. Probably should have kept the conversation here. I don't know mechanics or how bot posting works. I have not watched "Her," but I did accidentally watch half of "The Crying Game" and I think that evokes a similar reaction. As far as "how can we tell," a few hunches:
* Bot answers seem to be pedantic/didactic/school-marmy
* Often appear to open with a broad, possibly overly-broad, general statement and then narrow down, the classic (but dull and pro-forma) "hour glass" style taught in intro composition classes.
* Bot answers seem to summarize conventional wisdom (and are thus rather dull to read, if you already have a grasp of the facts).
* I've seen the end of a number of bot statements go non-committal and "safe" at the end.
* I've not seen a bot answer that incorporates humor or wit.
* Haven't seen a good bot answer incorporating snark or sarcasm.
* Tend to be responses neither short nor long. Wartstein, for example, definitely isn't a bot. Neither is Beggar-So.
* Very few abbreviations, bad grammar, misspellings, or colloquialisms. Clearly, apollo isn't a bot.
* Middle-of-the-road vocabulary. Few unusual or low-frequency words used.
* You get the feeling you are reading "averages." Ie, they tend to be "safe" answers, unless political, in which case I've not seen a bot answer break right, but have seen many break left.
^ Hope I'm not too OT here. Just my opinions. Not an expert. Interested to see what others think.