MAP policy change? 35%

Discuss Spyderco's products and history.
User avatar
jtoler_9
Member
Posts: 909
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:38 am
Location: Utah

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#521

Post by jtoler_9 »

SharpieB wrote:
emjay4248 wrote:I am new to Spyderco Forum but I am a member of Blade forum and the new pricing is being discussed there. I cannot believe that this has been done.....
...Crazy....
Your post is a joke.
Dude, calm down. No need to shout down any voice, new or old, that expresses an opinion that differs from yours. Unless of course your trying to win some sycophantic award in the group think olympics?

Welcome to the forum emjay.. I guess enjoy your stay? :rolleyes:
User avatar
jabba359
Member
Posts: 4965
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 10:07 pm
Location: Van Nuys, CA U.S.A. Earth
Contact:

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#522

Post by jabba359 »

SharpieB wrote:
emjay4248 wrote:I was given a Military clone as a gift and I use it in the house as a box and letter opener because I refuse to buy or carry a clone, but I must say that for an EDC knife they are **** good. I by no means am supporting clones I am just telling it the way it is.
You refuse to buy or carry a clone but use a Spderco clone as a letter opener? That’s cool with you? Seriously?
To be fair, it was gifted to him. If somebody gifted me a clone and I couldn't return it for a refund, I'd probably relagate it to letter opening duty as well (I wouldn't trust it for real work) rather than tossing what was meant to be a thoughtful gift in the trash.
-Kyle

:bug-red
Latest arrivals: Lava Flow CF DLC Para2, Magnacut Mule, GITD Jester

http://www.spydiewiki.com
User avatar
Peter1960
Member
Posts: 3677
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:54 pm
Location: Austria, Europe

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#523

Post by Peter1960 »

A lot of good, better and even bad reading in this threat.
From my point of view and as a former "hard core" collector something changed during the last couple of years with Spyderco. Now they are more market driven than ever. Nowadays they are more focused in varieties of steel types, handle colors and materials and collaboration projetcs than ever. A lot of new models pop up and become discontinued after short time. I guess this results in higher intercompany structure and costs also. Logistic costs for distribution and also for the dealer structure itself will not go down due to this. And I also see continuous challenges they have with their overseas manufacturers (not makeing their business easier). And as European I also have the feeling they are to much focused on their home market in America but that's their good right.

I still think Spyderco is a reliable company but they switch in a direction not attractive enough any more for me as it were in the past.

What I can't get in my head is this thing with MAP. Why is it necessary in a free market? What are the consequences for a seller breaking the MAP-rules? Or is it in fact a toothless tiger in the market jungle with no consequences?

If MAP is really a shield to protect small dealers why not MSP = Maximum Selling Price as shield for the end line user in addition? In Europe and probably in other parts of our good old earth we would have good need for it.

Live could be so easy without being a knife afficionado ... :D
Peter - founding member of Spydiewiki.com

"Integrity is being good even if no one is watching"
Spyderco's company motto
Holzfaeller
Member
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 3:11 pm

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#524

Post by Holzfaeller »

I agree with everything that Peter1960 said.
gaj999
Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:01 pm

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#525

Post by gaj999 »

Peter1960 wrote:What I can't get in my head is this thing with MAP. Why is it necessary in a free market?
It's purpose is to increase dealer profit margins and keep them from dropping the brand. Otherwise all sales would end up going through Amazon and a couple of other big dealers because most customers are price-whores. Look at all the angst in this thread over a small increase. It's interesting to watch. Brick and mortar retail is dying. It's the continuation of a trend that started with supermarkets and department stores, moved to big-box stores, shifted online, and will eventually end up local with 3D printing technology. Spyderco is in the awkward position of transitioning from a maker of basic tools into a luxury brand with product in both categories while this upheaval is going on. You need retailers with a good profit margin for luxury branding to work and retailers are struggling. IMO, you also need to stop selling product through Amazon, or maybe everything save the Byrd line, but that's not my decision to make. My only decision is price/performance/brand image/styling.
User avatar
Peter1960
Member
Posts: 3677
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:54 pm
Location: Austria, Europe

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#526

Post by Peter1960 »

Thanks gaj999 for your explanation, I appreciate your help and willingness to help me, but my question was more a hypothetical question, I should have stated this earlier and more visible. My background is commercial college and a lifelong career in commercial dealings too.

As a producer I would consider MAP also as usable possibility to protect me (in this case it is Spyderco) from dangerous dependency of bulk purchasers, with some benefits for my smaller b2b on the opposite side. ;)
gaj999 wrote:IMO, you also need to stop selling product through Amazon, ...
That is a very good point! But how to eat an elephant ... :confused:
Peter - founding member of Spydiewiki.com

"Integrity is being good even if no one is watching"
Spyderco's company motto
User avatar
timlara
Member
Posts: 1450
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Lakewood, CO

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#527

Post by timlara »

Good points, gaj999.

I also think part of the intention of MAP is to try to combat the growing fake/counterfeit problem, as any Spydercos advertised significantly under the MAP price should be obvious fakes. However, I fear that this logic really only applies to educated knife-knuts, as the general public just searching for a deal likely won't know or care about MAP, and won't know they're buying a fake. It's a very difficult problem to solve and it's really a bummer that it has to be dealt with.
Tim
Carlito86
Member
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 12:26 pm

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#528

Post by Carlito86 »

I am a Spyderco fan and collector. The prices of the knives I look to buy went up 20 dollars.
I am very sad to say that,but the $\value factor was hit.
Happy I bought a lot in the past. This year I will sadly limit my spending, thats my message, and I love spyderco. I mean no real spyderco fan can be happy about it, I understand, but I am not happy, just as I am not happy that I have no new high end to buy this year,because I really love their knives. Normally buy 15 spyderco a year. Will still get 4-5
JRinFL
Member
Posts: 6151
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 9:30 am
Location: Unfashionable West End of the Galaxy (SE USA)

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#529

Post by JRinFL »

The reason for a MAP increase might be lost in a market that also has American made knives in M390 steel that sell at under $80 US. I think the message received is likely different than the message intended.
But what do I know, I’m just an ELU/AFI or whatever box I’m meant to be in.
"...it costs nothing to be polite." - Winston Churchill
“Maybe the cheese in the mousetrap is an artificially created cheaper price?” -Sal
Friends call me Jim. As do my foes.
M.N.O.S.D. 0001
User avatar
bh49
Member
Posts: 11466
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 12:37 pm
Location: former Constitution state

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#530

Post by bh49 »

ZrowsN1s wrote:If my Spydies are only going to increase in cost $5 for a base model Dragonfly and $18 for a top shelf fluted carbon fiber native, I'd say at worst I will buy one less knife this year.
I'm very loyal to Spyderco, but it's not blind loyalty. I am loyal because they make the best value knives on the market. I just looked at what's for sale at BHQ, KW, and KP... as far as I can see Spyderco is STILL the best value out there. If you know where I can get a knife that rivals the Fluted CF Native in quality for under $230, I'm all ears. If you can do better than a VG-10 Delica for $68 I'm all ears. (Not to mention there's always the Byrd line for the truly budget conscious) I look at what other companies are offering and I see plenty of lower prices, but nothing approaching the quality, craftsmanship, and materials.
We have couple things in common. IMHO I am loyal Spyderco customer and forum member.
I am on this forum for more than 10 years every day with very rare exclusions. I am carrying and using Spyderco knives since 2005. Also I love my Sharpmaker. :)
Since 2006 I carry and use Spyderco knives almost exclusively. There are only two exceptions. If I travel out of country or to NYC, I carry SAK. Also I carried ZT0562CF for a few month may be once a week. But this in the past. :rolleyes:
I also not blind. I love Spyderco for their ergos and cutting abilities.
Unfortunately I cannot agree with you that Spyderco knives are the best value. No doubts, it is hard to beat value of Spyderco FRN knives: Delica, Endura, Centofante and Native5, when you buy them on line. ( I am not sure, if CF Fluted Native5 is a good value. And honestly I do not care. It well worth $230 for me personally). But when we go at least a level up to G10 or CF or Ti models, many people will successfully argue that other quality brands has models with better values.
I am working for production company and the only person, who carry Spyderco. Several others carry BM, Kershaw and gas station knives.
You mentioned Byrd line. One of my coworkers just bought Chinese made Kershaw for $15 on sale. Considering Kershaw customer service and warrantly, this is not bad at all. I use to own couple Kershaws and not crazy about their ergos, but the kid loves it. Plus free sharpening and Kershaw will pay return shipping.
So I love my Spyderco knives for their ergos and slicing abilities. I certainly love my Sharpmaker. And some of them are great values, but not the most of them.
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf"

My top choices Natives5, Calys, C83 Persian
Mastermachetier
Member
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2017 10:22 am

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#531

Post by Mastermachetier »

bh49 wrote:
ZrowsN1s wrote:If my Spydies are only going to increase in cost $5 for a base model Dragonfly and $18 for a top shelf fluted carbon fiber native, I'd say at worst I will buy one less knife this year.
I'm very loyal to Spyderco, but it's not blind loyalty. I am loyal because they make the best value knives on the market. I just looked at what's for sale at BHQ, KW, and KP... as far as I can see Spyderco is STILL the best value out there. If you know where I can get a knife that rivals the Fluted CF Native in quality for under $230, I'm all ears. If you can do better than a VG-10 Delica for $68 I'm all ears. (Not to mention there's always the Byrd line for the truly budget conscious) I look at what other companies are offering and I see plenty of lower prices, but nothing approaching the quality, craftsmanship, and materials.
We have couple things in common. IMHO I am loyal Spyderco customer and forum member.
I am on this forum for more than 10 years every day with very rare exclusions. I am carrying and using Spyderco knives since 2005. Also I love my Sharpmaker. :)
Since 2006 I carry and use Spyderco knives almost exclusively. There are only two exceptions. If I travel out of country or to NYC, I carry SAK. Also I carried ZT0562CF for a few month may be once a week. But this in the past. :rolleyes:
I also not blind. I love Spyderco for their ergos and cutting abilities.
Unfortunately I cannot agree with you that Spyderco knives are the best value. No doubts, it is hard to beat value of Spyderco FRN knives: Delica, Endura, Centofante and Native5, when you buy them on line. ( I am not sure, if CF Fluted Native5 is a good value. And honestly I do not care. It well worth $230 for me personally). But when we go at least a level up to G10 or CF or Ti models, many people will successfully argue that other quality brands has models with better values.
I am working for production company and the only person, who carry Spyderco. Several others carry BM, Kershaw and gas station knives.
You mentioned Byrd line. One of my coworkers just bought Chinese made Kershaw for $15 on sale. Considering Kershaw customer service and warrantly, this is not bad at all. I use to own couple Kershaws and not crazy about their ergos, but the kid loves it. Plus free sharpening and Kershaw will pay return shipping.
So I love my Spyderco knives for their ergos and slicing abilities. I certainly love my Sharpmaker. And some of them are great values, but not the most of them.

I think the value equation comes when comparing certain models to the competition. Spydercos might not be the best value knives all around , but compared to the other big knife manufacturers certain knives where in really good niches prices wise. Models like the Delica, Endura, PM2, even the Shaman, before the price increase that is. Now with the price increases they are among tougher competition. I still love spydercos and will probably get some in the future , but i will probably tend to stick to the exclusive and sprint models.
Unbrokenchain33
Member
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 6:52 pm

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#532

Post by Unbrokenchain33 »

Noticed one of the main reputable stores doesn't have the change in place yet. Scooped their last Sage 5. Woo
User avatar
ZrowsN1s
Member
Posts: 7564
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 4:08 pm
Location: San Diego, California USA

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#533

Post by ZrowsN1s »

Mastermachetier wrote:
bh49 wrote:....
We have couple things in common. IMHO I am loyal Spyderco customer and forum member.
I am on this forum for more than 10 years every day with very rare exclusions. I am carrying and using Spyderco knives since 2005. Also I love my Sharpmaker. :)
Since 2006 I carry and use Spyderco knives almost exclusively. ..... to G10 or CF or Ti models, many people will successfully argue that other quality brands has models with better values.
I am working for production company and the only person, who carry Spyderco. Several others carry BM, Kershaw and gas station knives.
You mentioned Byrd line. One of my coworkers just bought Chinese made Kershaw for $15 on sale. Considering Kershaw customer service and warrantly, this is not bad at all. I use to own couple Kershaws and not crazy about their ergos, but the kid loves it. Plus free sharpening and Kershaw will pay return shipping.
So I love my Spyderco knives for their ergos and slicing abilities. I certainly love my Sharpmaker. And some of them are great values, but not the most of them.
....
I think the value equation comes when comparing certain models to the competition. Spydercos might not be the best value knives all around , but compared to the other big knife manufacturers certain knives where in really good niches prices wise. Models like the Delica, Endura, PM2, even the Shaman, before the price increase that is. Now with the price increases they are among tougher competition. I still love spydercos and will probably get some in the future , but i will probably tend to stick to the exclusive and sprint models.
I think I understand what you guys mean. And you are most definitely a loyal Spyderco fan BH49 :D I hope I'm still posting here in 10 years. Much respect :spyder:

I've handled plenty of benchmades, and owned a few Kershaws, CRKT's, Bucks, ect. With Spyderco I have stuck mostly to the sprints and exclusives in my collecting as well. I was buying knives in the $300 dollar range around the time I switched to Spyderco. Not a single one of those $300 knives I own can hold a candle to the Blurple S110V Para 2 I bought for $150. Now that a blurple pm2 costs $165... that's still true. Better steel, better lock, better fit and finish. But that's just comparing them to my other favorite brand.

Spyderco offers a range of steels other companies don't. It's hard for me to say a Cruwear, Hap 40, or Maxamet knife is over priced when hardly anyone or no one else is making them. What knives do I compare those to? For example if anyone is desperate for a Cruwear flipper BHQ has some for $700, KW has them for $675. Want maxamet or hap40? The only knives at BHQ like that say Spyderco. If you want Maxamet or fluted cf it's spyderco or nothing. Now does everyone value fluted CF and maxamet as much as I do... probably not.

I also realize "Value" is a subjective word. I went and took another look at BHQ, looking for a more concrete example of what I meant. And after a second look I must admit you are right, the competition is actually starting to inch closer.... Here's a link to BHQ with the filters "CPM s30v" and "G-10" sorted from lowest to highest priced. I know this is a narrow example, I was trying to keep it simple, S30V is widely available and so is G-10.
https://www.bladehq.com/cat--Manual-Kni ... erial:G-10

Looking at the knives... looking at the prices... The competition is closer than I remember but I don't see a single knife on that page I would buy over a Spyderco. I do not think the BM Freek or Bugout is better made (or a better knife) than the Manix even though they are all the same material and both BM's are $4 dollars more than the Manix. I'd even go so far as to say the Manix is a MUCH nicer knife. Same with the Para 3 at $130 vs the bugout at $114. Even for $15 difference there's no competition (to me) which is the better quality knife for relatively the same amount of money.

...but this is all subjective... and I am biased. Most definitely :D

When I looked at vg-10 and m390 blades, I saw what you guys were talking about. There were a some $130 m390 flippers with titanium, and some respectable looking $100 vg-10 g-10 flippers. (I hate frame locks, smooth metal handles, and ball bearings, but I realize other people like them even though I'd never buy one). They are from a Chinese company I've haven't heard much of, so I'm a little dubious to the quality (but who knows maybe it's there). But ya either way, at $50 dollars cheaper than a Mantra, if you like frame lock titanium flippers, that could be a good deal if the quality is there (ie. good heat treat, high grade materials, fit and finish). I suspect if someone handed me one of those frame lock vg-10 flippers and then asked me if I'd rather have a vg-10 delica for $30 cheaper... I'd pick the Delica. A vg-10 ti framelock flipper vs. a ZDP delica for the same price... ZDP all day. I'm rambling now... sorry :o The point I was trying to make was if I saw a knife with a really well made lock, great design, handle material, fit and finish, super steel, ect... at a lower price than Spyderco... If I thought it was a superior product for a lower price, I'd buy it.
-Matt a.k.a. Lo_Que, loadedquestions135 I ❤ Hawkbills :bug-red

"The world of edges has a small doorway in, but opens into a cavern that is both wide and deep." -sal
"Ghost hunters scope the edge." -sal
User avatar
bh49
Member
Posts: 11466
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 12:37 pm
Location: former Constitution state

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#534

Post by bh49 »

Mastermachetier wrote: Models like the Delica, Endura, PM2, even the Shaman, before the price increase that is. Now with the price increases they are among tougher competition. I still love spydercos and will probably get some in the future , but i will probably tend to stick to the exclusive and sprint models.
agree.
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf"

My top choices Natives5, Calys, C83 Persian
ross8425
Member
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2017 10:32 am

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#535

Post by ross8425 »

bh49 wrote:
Mastermachetier wrote: Models like the Delica, Endura, PM2, even the Shaman, before the price increase that is. Now with the price increases they are among tougher competition. I still love spydercos and will probably get some in the future , but i will probably tend to stick to the exclusive and sprint models.
agree.
Even some of those are going to be tough. The 52100 p3 is going to be $185. This p3 is $25 better than a 556-1 BM with cpm-20v? At that price, it's actually more than the 551-1 too. And $10 more than the pm2 that for some reason is still $175. Oh well, nothing we can do about it,other than buy less.
ABX2011
Member
Posts: 2317
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 7:54 pm

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#536

Post by ABX2011 »

Like many have already expressed, the price increases will change my behavior. I was already becoming more selective and cautious after growing tired of buying new knives and taking a big hit when selling after little use.
So I'll rely more than ever on the secondary market. I'll also take advantage of year-end bargains as I did recently.
I won't buy new from a dealer at MAP unless it's a sprint run or exclusive.
northmanscall
Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 4:05 am

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#537

Post by northmanscall »

Spyderco offers a range of steels other companies don't. It's hard for me to say a Cruwear, Hap 40, or Maxamet knife is over priced when hardly anyone or no one else is making them. What knives do I compare those to? For example if anyone is desperate for a Cruwear flipper BHQ has some for $700, KW has them for $675. Want maxamet or hap40? The only knives at BHQ like that say Spyderco. If you want Maxamet or fluted cf it's spyderco or nothing. Now does everyone value fluted CF and maxamet as much as I do... probably not.
Thank you.

Like someone mentioned before: if you are not able to spend 15$ more on a 150$ luxury product then your problems are maybe somewhere else.

I struggle to see a company which has such a variety of steels, variations and models combined with as good manufacturing as Spyderco. And they produce in America. There are other companies where 7 dudes sit in an office like:"i feel like we should chop another pig in half" and produce everything outside your country.

So maybe to maintain a healthier distribution and supply chain it is necessary to pay a little more and consider the whole situation and not just one knife with the same steel thats cheaper on Amazon. I have no problem in spending that little more since i still consider it worth the money for this variety of factors.

Greetings
:bug-red Stefan :bug-red
Tdog
Member
Posts: 1853
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:04 pm
Location: The woods of Florida

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#538

Post by Tdog »

Can the complex be simple, and the simple be complex? Demand curves, price elasticity, macroeconomics, thrown into the mix, striving to do the right thing and take care of extended family. If it wasn't so cold I'd go fishing. ;)
Last edited by Tdog on Sat Jan 06, 2018 5:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
ThePeacent
Member
Posts: 2847
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 12:45 am
Location: Barcelona, Spain

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#539

Post by ThePeacent »

so, from now on, used Spydies, abused folders for a SPA treatment and retirement home plan and stocking up on Byrds :D
emjay4248
Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 8:54 pm

Re: MAP policy change? 35%

#540

Post by emjay4248 »

I have been reading quite a few pages of this thread and have come to a personal conclusion that this MAP pricing issue is strictly aimed at the retailer to give them better margins. I am a business person myself and deal with a market that works with bids. I am normally not the cheapest nor am I the most expensive I usually fall in the middle which by the way is where you want to be. I am not looking for the cheapest prices nor do I want to pay the most expensive. Part of the reason that I would buy mostly Spyderco's is value for the dollar. If you look at some of their MSRP pricing you will see that it is out of control. $430 for a Southard and I think that is the old price What gives.
Even though we all like having a myriad of choices it costs a lot more to manufacture that many SKU's it maybe time to trim back on their selections. Their is a rule in statistics called the 80/20 rule that states 80% of the profit comes from 20% of the models, this rule applies to many different things but is a good guide when trimming back.

I would not be as upset if they cut their SKU's by 20% or 25% which in turn would lower their production and inventory costs and pass that on to the dealers. I am sure that the backlash would be minor and most people would not even notice.

I again say that in an uncertain economy and with competition breathing down their necks it is time to tighten the reins on their own operation and not raise the price to the consumer. There is always 10% fat that can be trimmed from the business to tighten up costs.

If it is true that their costs are so high that they have to put an MSRP of $430.00 on the Southard then their is an internal problem with their costs.
I am not sure if the Glessers feel the same way about this issue. I am sure that 6 months down the road all this will be forgotten by the public and things will be back to "normal" but the residual effects will linger. It will make it more difficult for new collectors to enter the Spyderco collecting hobby.

When someone is ill eastern medicine dictates that we find the source of the problem and treat that and all the negative effects will be gone. Western
medicine dictates that we patch up the symptom and go our merry way, Soon enough another symptom arises and we patch that too but know I have to take an additional medication to stop the effects of the two original patches and so on.

Raising MAP will have no positive effect in the long run it is only a patch.
Post Reply