Page 3 of 4
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2026 10:16 pm
by Wartstein
SpyderEdgeForever wrote: ↑Mon Feb 02, 2026 1:46 pm
Mastiff, PaloArt, David, Wartstein and sal, and all:
One thing I would love to see Spyderco do is expand tgeir Ethnic Division and work with Czech,
Austrian, Spanish, etc Knife people to create entire catalogues of
Enduras and other models, with VG10 steel, but with their regional spin on each model.
Hey SEF,
I´d not complain if Spyderco gave my most favorite folder of all brands and all times an Austrian (my homecountry) edition...

whatever that might look like and VG10 would be just fine as a steel choice
(For two typical Austrian knives in general see here
viewtopic.php?p=1293139#p1293139 and here
viewtopic.php?p=1410790#p1410790)
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2026 12:53 am
by PaloArt
Wartstein wrote: ↑Mon Feb 02, 2026 10:16 pm
SpyderEdgeForever wrote: ↑Mon Feb 02, 2026 1:46 pm
Mastiff, PaloArt, David, Wartstein and sal, and all:
One thing I would love to see Spyderco do is expand tgeir Ethnic Division and work with Czech,
Austrian, Spanish, etc Knife people to create entire catalogues of
Enduras and other models, with VG10 steel, but with their regional spin on each model.
Hey SEF,
I´d not complain if Spyderco gave my most favorite folder of all brands and all times an Austrian (my homecountry) edition...

whatever that might look like and VG10 would be just fine as a steel choice
(For two typical Austrian knives in general see here
viewtopic.php?p=1293139#p1293139 and here
viewtopic.php?p=1410790#p1410790)
Hi
@SpyderEdgeForever and
@Wartstein this is fun idea actually, the only typical Czech flavor would be either Mikov Fish knife that is the most iconic here and everyone knows as kids knife which is used by adults as mushroom picking knife (fish scale pattern on the handle of Endura perhaps?) OR national tree which is Lime Tree in english (if not mistaken) and that is one bad wood for handle scales OR our national colours which are basically same colours as U.S. - White Red Blue... and that is where my limited imagination ends

- none of them super good idea on my part

. VG10 good with me, great and easy to maintain steel, I love it on my Manbug now.
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2026 5:10 am
by RugerNurse
I like VG10. I cut a bunch of cardboard the other day and it was still pretty sharp. A light touch up on the 1500 grit stone and strop and it was good to go.
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2026 9:55 am
by N. Brian Huegel
Don't forget ATS-55.
nb
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2026 10:20 am
by Bill1170
Wartstein wrote: ↑Sun Feb 01, 2026 10:12 pm
James Y wrote: ↑Sun Feb 01, 2026 10:08 pm
...
IIRC, VG-10 was originally for knives used for horticultural purposes.
Jim
Thanks, Jim!
Something like that is what I recall too.
Grafting knives, in particular.
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2026 11:18 am
by wrdwrght
Why the criticism? Because too many people here fail to ask themselves why Sal usually adds “All good, just different” to his statements on steel.
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2026 11:35 am
by SpyderEdgeForever
Another great steel. Yes.
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2026 6:22 pm
by Jeb
I certainly don't have any issue with VG10 blade steel. I have several knives in the steel and it's always holding up for me and I tend to get rough with my stuff when the task demands more, heck I will lean into the VG10...
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2026 9:48 pm
by Spyderbot_matrix
Won’t hear any bashing from me- Got a Police 4, Rockhopper wharncliffe, Centofante 3, and a prehistoric Endura sabergrind aka “the chonk” in VG10-
It just works. No weather updates, sharp, isn’t any duller than a resilience I use for food prep, and it’s readily available, meaning I lose it, I speed run the grieving process.
Now- as far as the supersteels that easily replace VG-10 aforementioned…
They all can be bashed if they are not properly heat treated. Some companies advertise having super steel, and then go 80% of the heat treatment to maximize profits. If you’re buying a m390 pocket knife for $90, its only going to be acceptable.
Boo on them.
•The 20CV Bracket of steels is my absolute favorite for daily use and is a proven successor to VG-10, and it’ll hold an edge, what feels like forever in my experience.
•Magnacut checks all the boxes, but also “feels” like it’s overrated. I have 2 PM3 lw I’m not ready to put in rotation.
•A shame about SPY27- I use it now sparingly since it was supposed to be the new VG-10 and it doesn’t disappoint at all.
•LC200N- taking a salt 2 for a test drive, but no rust and good hardness really sounds promising.
•S30-110V steels also good, and usually if I got the Endura in my pocket, I also got the Manix2 LW in S110V too.
I’m not an expert, I just like a good pocket knife and my experience with VG-10 opened up my eyes to try other steels. Its weird speaking about all these Steels as though they’re obsolete.
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2026 9:06 am
by Mage7
I don't know why people feel the need to defend steels from criticism. It would be like someone going to s race track and insisting your 70s era muscle car is still just as good as the 21st century sports car or super car. Meanwhile neither one is very practical for getting groceries.
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2026 10:48 am
by chronovore
Good points in the thread so far. I find VG-10 "adequate". I feel the same about N690, 14C28N, Nitro-V, 154CM, 9Cr18MoV, and the Chinese analog of VG-10, 10Cr15CoMoV.
There is a difference between "adequate for my EDC needs" and good, good for the price, or exciting. Some of it is that being a collector, getting different things over the years, and watching the regular barrage of new models; VG-10 does feel a little tired and doesn't feel very competitive at the prices where I see it being used. (The pricing on well-made Chinese budget knives in 10Cr15CoMoV doesn't help.)
Coincidentally, I'm excited on that front about the new Retract in 9Cr18MoV. While that steel has been used a lot in Chinese knives, it feels fresh on a Spyderco. It feels especially fresh given the alternative of 8Cr13MoV, which is not only tired but has relatively poor performance compared to any of the steels mentioned in this post. I've been wishing for years that Spyderco would upgrade the budget lines to 9Cr18MoV. Coincidentally, 10Cr15CoMoV would be a fitting upgrade for the Chinese models if the Seki models ever move past VG-10.
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2026 11:02 am
by SpyderEdgeForever
How many of you want Spyderco to make more spear point VG10 knives?
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2026 12:32 pm
by RugerNurse

Speaking of VG10 I saw this beauty in a local gun store. Reminds me of Vivi’s quest for one
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2026 3:35 pm
by Jeb
RugerNurse wrote: ↑Wed Feb 04, 2026 12:32 pm

Speaking of VG10 I saw this beauty in a local gun store. Reminds me of Vivi’s quest for one
V ain't the only one that wants a larger one lol...when I look in the mirror I see another one lol. That is a nice looking one, you bought this one right? Man I hate going into stores like that, I always leave way heavier.
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2026 6:32 pm
by sal
Deadboxhero wrote: ↑Mon Feb 02, 2026 9:54 am
@sal
Could you take us back to when VG-10 was coming out and how it compared in your opinion to ATS-34/154-CM?
Here you go Shawn...
Talkin' Story,
The VG-10 story is kinda like the 154Cm / ATS-34 story. "Back in the day", maybe 1998, we were using Gingami 1 (G-2) in most of our knives made in Japan. ATS-34 was our "Higher line" blade steel. I was getting more and more involved in blade steels, edge geometries, and was seeking better performance. ATS-34 was quite expensive and harder to process. We were using Crucible's CPM-440V in out Golden factory.
I was a member of the US Knifemakers Guild and the ABS. Learning a great deal.
Hitachi had come up with a new steel, ATS-55, and offered it to us as an exclusive. Testing went OK, so we signed on, and we were using the steel in most of our Seki made knives. Then another maker told us of a new steel developed by Takefu for Grafting in horticulture. They called it VG-10. Again, testing went OK, so we added VG-10 to our stable of steels. We introduced VG-10 in a fixed blade, the Moran, and began using it for many of our Seki models.
Over the next few years, testing and ELU response was watched carefully and we eventually gave up ATS-55 and continued using VG-10 to this day.
We continued to work with Crucible adding steels and Crucible decided that Blade steels was a potential market and began working knife shows, which worked well for them.
Then Carpenter Steel asked us if we would help them develop blade steels and bring them into the Knife Market. We have a decent testing lab, CATRA, etc., so we worked with them for the next few years. That's how the line of CTS steels came into the knife market. Once they had a working line of Blade steels, their head metallurgist asked me, what can we (Carpenter) do for Spyderco for our efforts.
I told them that there was a Japanese steel made by Hitachi, called Gingami 1, that we were using in Japan and importing to the US to use in our Golden factory. There was no USA equivalent, so I asked them if they could make a powdered version and tweak it for blade steel performance. The result was CTS-BD1N. turned out to be a really good all around steel. I had hoped for an exclusive, but that wasn't going to happen.
A while later, I was speaking with Bob Shabala at Niagara and wondered in Crucible would make a special steel and give it to Spyderco as an exclusive? Bob didn't think it was likely, but as it turned out, Crucible agreed. I was working with Crucible's metallurgist, Mr. Bob Skibitski (I call him Bobski), who is a gifted Metallurgist. I told him that there was a Japanese ingot steel made by Takefu, called VG-10, which is a really good all around steel, for which there is no American equivalent. The president of Takefu told me that he believed that Cobalt added to the alloy helped to enhance the results. I asked him if he could make an equivalent Cobalt based steel, powder it and tweak it for blade steel performance. After a few runs, he/we came up with SPY-27. We had already discussed the exclusive angle and that's how we ended up with the alloy.
Hope that helps.
sal
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A goal in life is to be consistent like the sun and transparent like the air. That's how trust is built... and trust is the true bottom line".
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2026 6:38 pm
by M_J87
sal wrote: ↑Wed Feb 04, 2026 6:32 pm
Deadboxhero wrote: ↑Mon Feb 02, 2026 9:54 am
@sal
Could you take us back to when VG-10 was coming out and how it compared in your opinion to ATS-34/154-CM?
Here you go Shawn...
Talkin' Story,
The VG-10 story is kinda like the 154Cm / ATS-34 story. "Back in the day", maybe 1998, we were using Gingami 1 (G-2) in most of our knives made in Japan. ATS-34 was our "Higher line" blade steel. I was getting more and more involved in blade steels, edge geometries, and was seeking better performance. ATS-34 was quite expensive and harder to process. We were using Crucible's CPM-440V in out Golden factory.
I was a member of the US Knifemakers Guild and the ABS. Learning a great deal.
Hitachi had come up with a new steel, ATS-55, and offered it to us as an exclusive. Testing went OK, so we signed on, and we were using the steel in most of our Seki made knives. Then another maker told us of a new steel developed by Takefu for Grafting in horticulture. They called it VG-10. Again, testing went OK, so we added VG-10 to our stable of steels. We introduced VG-10 in a fixed blade, the Moran, and began using it for many of our Seki models.
Over the next few years, testing and ELU response was watched carefully and we eventually gave up ATS-55 and continued using VG-10 to this day.
We continued to work with Crucible adding steels and Crucible decided that Blade steels was a potential market and began working knife shows, which worked well for them.
Then Carpenter Steel asked us if we would help them develop blade steels and bring them into the Knife Market. We have a decent testing lab, CATRA, etc., so we worked with them for the next few years. That's how the line of CTS steels came into the knife market. Once they had a working line of Blade steels, their head metallurgist asked me, what can we (Carpenter) do for Spyderco for our efforts.
I told them that there was a Japanese steel made by Hitachi, called Gingami 1, that we were using in Japan and importing to the US to use in our Golden factory. There was no USA equivalent, so I asked them if they could make a powdered version and tweak it for blade steel performance. The result was CTS-BD1N. turned out to be a really good all around steel. I had hoped for an exclusive, but that wasn't going to happen.
A while later, I was speaking with Bob Shabala at Niagara and wondered in Crucible would make a special steel and give it to Spyderco as an exclusive? Bob didn't think it was likely, but as it turned out, Crucible agreed. I was working with Crucible's metallurgist, Mr. Bob Skibitski (I call him Bobski), who is a gifted Metallurgist. I told him that there was a Japanese ingot steel made by Takefu, called VG-10, which is a really good all around steel, for which there is no American equivalent. The president of Takefu told me that he believed that Cobalt added to the alloy helped to enhance the results. I asked him if he could make an equivalent Cobalt based steel, powder it and tweak it for blade steel performance. After a few runs, he/we came up with SPY-27. We had already discussed the exclusive angle and that's how we ended up with the alloy.
Hope that helps.
sal
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A goal in life is to be consistent like the sun and transparent like the air. That's how trust is built... and trust is the true bottom line".
Cool story. Thanks Sal.
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2026 6:41 pm
by M_J87
Mage7 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 04, 2026 9:06 am
I don't know why people feel the need to defend steels from criticism. It would be like someone going to s race track and insisting your 70s era muscle car is still just as good as the 21st century sports car or super car. Meanwhile neither one is very practical for getting groceries.
While speed is one aspect that might be objectively better in a modern sports car over a 70's muscle, that doesn't mean the 70's muscle for example doesn't look better, have more trunk space, cheaper on gas, cheaper to purchase, etc.
I don't think anyone's trying to defend raw edge performance for VG-10. It's the other aspects like cost, sharpen-ability, stainlessness, etc. that often get overlooked for edge retention.
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2026 7:22 pm
by Scandi Grind
Mage7 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 04, 2026 9:06 am
I don't know why people feel the need to defend steels from criticism. It would be like someone going to s race track and insisting your 70s era muscle car is still just as good as the 21st century sports car or super car. Meanwhile neither one is very practical for getting groceries.
I don't think VG-10 needs much defending just because so many people already know it is a great steel even in the current market. Then again, many people new to the hobby get on the edge retention or "newness" bandwagon without much reason other than the big numbers mentality, so maybe that is a reason to iterate the benefits of "basic" steels like VG-10. If were talking about something really practical, something that "gets your groceries", then I'd say VG-10 is exactly that.
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2026 7:31 pm
by Philo Beddoe
DansGearAddiction wrote: ↑Sun Feb 01, 2026 10:30 pm
Honestly, I think it goes beyond VG-10 since there are several excellent steels that have “fallen out of vogue” over the last 5 years or so.
I also don't think it's popularity has decreased because of it's properties, it's the manufacturers dropping it becausse of a shift in consumers that demanded "the best" as a result of the Instagramification of EDC.
- D2: Oversaturated on budget knives, though there were real concerns about corrosion resistance, particularly for in coastal areas. I was happy to see 9Cr18MoV, Nitro-V, and AR-RPM9 replace this.
- LC200N: Magnacut basically killed this steel despite the fact that it is tougher than Magnacut; LC200N was rarely used by knife makers outside of Spyderco and Quietcarry, and at least once by Kizer. Custom makers like Oz Machine Company used it, but replaced it with Magnacut when that became the popular kid.
- M390/CPM-20CV/CTS-204P: Killed by Magnacut and the over-saturation of M390 in particular; I think only Spyderco, Microtech, and Zero Tolerance use this the Carpenter variant. I think Niagara even mentioned 20CV going away.
- VG-10: Same as M390 in my opinion.
- S30V: This was killed by the proliferation of super steels like M390/CPM-20CV/CTS-204P and user demands for “the best”.
- CTS-BD1N/BD1Z: Not really used by any knife companies outside of Spyderco at this point; SOG used it in the past, but it doesn’t appear to be used much. Seems to have been replaced by 9Cr18MoV.
- S45VN: A combination of the proliferation of Magnacut and the bankruptcy of Crucible killed this one. Chis Reeve Knives, who I believe helped develop this steel, isn’t even using it on the Sebenza or Umnumzaan anymore. Buck might still use it.
- S110V: I don't think anyone outside of Spyderco used this steel in a production capacity. Another Magnacut casualty likely.
Most of them follow a common theme...
Realistically, VG-10 or 154CM is really all I need. I like how simple they are to sharpen.
Missed one and its also been around for along time and my favorite..M4. IMO M4 is still one of the best all around steels and for me at least easy to sharpen. K390 and 15v are a close second. Rex121 has been interesting.
Re: VG-10 criticism: why?
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2026 8:37 pm
by Deadboxhero
Incredible, thank you for taking us on the journey, not only does that help us contextualize the steels before VG-10 but also the linege of how we got to BD1N which we see on the new lightweight PM2 along with the natural evolution to CPM SPY27 which in real world use has almost similar edge retention to the CPM S30V but with higher working hardness and better sharpenability.
I think the SPY27 has a very "Spyderco" touch to it.
From seeing the full history here seemed like SPY27 was a natural progression of your focus on high sharpness and sharpenability with the increase of more edge retention over the previous steels mentioned.
If BD1N was enhanced Gin 1 than SPY27 was supercharged, partial metallurgy VG10 with harder carbides and higher working hardness thanks to the finer structure.
So, that was quite a bonus, I wanted to know the history of the old materials 154CM/VG-10) but also got the benefit of the lineage tothe current Spyderco materials and their context.
I feel this information is nice especially for newer folks to read that are curious about the why, reason and context for all these different particular grades discussed and how they changed in the line up for the past 3 decades.
I greatly enjoyed it.
Thank you.
sal wrote: ↑Wed Feb 04, 2026 6:32 pm
Deadboxhero wrote: ↑Mon Feb 02, 2026 9:54 am
@sal
Could you take us back to when VG-10 was coming out and how it compared in your opinion to ATS-34/154-CM?
Here you go Shawn...
Talkin' Story,
The VG-10 story is kinda like the 154Cm / ATS-34 story. "Back in the day", maybe 1998, we were using Gingami 1 (G-2) in most of our knives made in Japan. ATS-34 was our "Higher line" blade steel. I was getting more and more involved in blade steels, edge geometries, and was seeking better performance. ATS-34 was quite expensive and harder to process. We were using Crucible's CPM-440V in out Golden factory.
I was a member of the US Knifemakers Guild and the ABS. Learning a great deal.
Hitachi had come up with a new steel, ATS-55, and offered it to us as an exclusive. Testing went OK, so we signed on, and we were using the steel in most of our Seki made knives. Then another maker told us of a new steel developed by Takefu for Grafting in horticulture. They called it VG-10. Again, testing went OK, so we added VG-10 to our stable of steels. We introduced VG-10 in a fixed blade, the Moran, and began using it for many of our Seki models.
Over the next few years, testing and ELU response was watched carefully and we eventually gave up ATS-55 and continued using VG-10 to this day.
We continued to work with Crucible adding steels and Crucible decided that Blade steels was a potential market and began working knife shows, which worked well for them.
Then Carpenter Steel asked us if we would help them develop blade steels and bring them into the Knife Market. We have a decent testing lab, CATRA, etc., so we worked with them for the next few years. That's how the line of CTS steels came into the knife market. Once they had a working line of Blade steels, their head metallurgist asked me, what can we (Carpenter) do for Spyderco for our efforts.
I told them that there was a Japanese steel made by Hitachi, called Gingami 1, that we were using in Japan and importing to the US to use in our Golden factory. There was no USA equivalent, so I asked them if they could make a powdered version and tweak it for blade steel performance. The result was CTS-BD1N. turned out to be a really good all around steel. I had hoped for an exclusive, but that wasn't going to happen.
A while later, I was speaking with Bob Shabala at Niagara and wondered in Crucible would make a special steel and give it to Spyderco as an exclusive? Bob didn't think it was likely, but as it turned out, Crucible agreed. I was working with Crucible's metallurgist, Mr. Bob Skibitski (I call him Bobski), who is a gifted Metallurgist. I told him that there was a Japanese ingot steel made by Takefu, called VG-10, which is a really good all around steel, for which there is no American equivalent. The president of Takefu told me that he believed that Cobalt added to the alloy helped to enhance the results. I asked him if he could make an equivalent Cobalt based steel, powder it and tweak it for blade steel performance. After a few runs, he/we came up with SPY-27. We had already discussed the exclusive angle and that's how we ended up with the alloy.
Hope that helps.
sal
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A goal in life is to be consistent like the sun and transparent like the air. That's how trust is built... and trust is the true bottom line".