China

Discuss Spyderco's products and history.
User avatar
sal
Member
Posts: 18150
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Golden, Colorado USA

Re: China

#281

Post by sal »

The tariffs are still fluctuating, so it's hard to nail down costs. I believe they will make a difference, in some cases, to raise the price of Some imports like China, assuming there are good rules and everyone follows the rules, which I question? I understand the goal and I've heard speculations from no tariffs to huge tariffs, so no one really knows. And with the current political division, truth becomes quite elusive.

sal
User avatar
Synov
Member
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2024 6:09 pm

Re: China

#282

Post by Synov »

BornIn1500 wrote:
Sun Nov 09, 2025 5:13 pm
Snacktime wrote:
Sat Nov 08, 2025 11:41 pm

This whole idea that Tariffs will strengthen USA manufacturing is complete garbage.
So then why do other countries tariff us so much? Are they really just sabotaging themselves? Are all other countries just incompetent and misguided? Or maybe there's a reason for it...
1. Most countries don't tariff us as much as you've been told by certain truth-challenged individuals. The average tariff on US exports was less than 2% before the tariff war.

2. The highest tariffs are from poor and tiny countries that have no other option to raise tax revenue and have little economic significance to the US.
Visualizing the Tradeoff of Higher Hardness
S90V: Nirvana Military 2 CF Native 5 Fluted CF Manix XL CF Yojumbo CF Shaman CF Sage 6 CF Native Chief CF MagnaCut: Native 5 Fluted Ti PM2 Crucible CPM-154/S90V: Manix 2 CF 15V: PM2 Marble CF 4V: Manix 2 Marble CF 3V: Tuff REX 121: Sage 5 CF 20CV: Subvert CF ZDP-189: Dragonfly 2 Nishijin S30V: Sage 4 Damasteel: Native 5 40th Anniversary VG-10: Delica 25th Anniversary N690Co: PITS XHP: Chaparral Birdseye Maple
BornIn1500
Member
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue May 08, 2018 10:04 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: China

#283

Post by BornIn1500 »

Synov wrote:
Tue Nov 11, 2025 3:43 am

The average tariff on US exports was less than 2% before the tariff war.
The median tariff rate worldwide is currently 2.6%. The US tariff rate is 1.5%, which remains one of the lowest in the world. If you remember, in 2018, all non-sanctioned countries were offered a zero tariff deal where if they’d drop their tariffs against the US, than we wouldn’t impose tariffs against those countries or would drop those already imposed. Those countries didn't accept the deal. So it's fairly obvious who is/was trying to take advantage of who here.
RyanY
Member
Posts: 224
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2022 10:53 pm

Re: China

#284

Post by RyanY »

sal wrote:
Mon Nov 10, 2025 10:55 pm
The tariffs are still fluctuating, so it's hard to nail down costs. I believe they will make a difference, in some cases, to raise the price of Some imports like China, assuming there are good rules and everyone follows the rules, which I question? I understand the goal and I've heard speculations from no tariffs to huge tariffs, so no one really knows. And with the current political division, truth becomes quite elusive.

sal
Elusive indeed.
-Ryan
MNOSD member #00053
ekastanis
Member
Posts: 190
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2018 5:05 pm

Re: China

#285

Post by ekastanis »

BornIn1500 wrote:
Tue Nov 11, 2025 12:47 pm
The median tariff rate worldwide is currently 2.6%. The US tariff rate is 1.5%, which remains one of the lowest in the world.
The U.S Average Effective Tariff Rate is currently almost 18%.
https://budgetlab.yale.edu/research/sta ... er-30-2025
User avatar
Danke
Member
Posts: 1080
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2015 10:05 pm

Re: China

#286

Post by Danke »

Lets not get all bogged down with facts
User avatar
Synov
Member
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2024 6:09 pm

Re: China

#287

Post by Synov »

ekastanis wrote:
Tue Nov 11, 2025 2:54 pm
BornIn1500 wrote:
Tue Nov 11, 2025 12:47 pm
The median tariff rate worldwide is currently 2.6%. The US tariff rate is 1.5%, which remains one of the lowest in the world.
The U.S Average Effective Tariff Rate is currently almost 18%.
https://budgetlab.yale.edu/research/sta ... er-30-2025
That's the effective rate on imports into the US, we're talking about the average rate on US exports.
Visualizing the Tradeoff of Higher Hardness
S90V: Nirvana Military 2 CF Native 5 Fluted CF Manix XL CF Yojumbo CF Shaman CF Sage 6 CF Native Chief CF MagnaCut: Native 5 Fluted Ti PM2 Crucible CPM-154/S90V: Manix 2 CF 15V: PM2 Marble CF 4V: Manix 2 Marble CF 3V: Tuff REX 121: Sage 5 CF 20CV: Subvert CF ZDP-189: Dragonfly 2 Nishijin S30V: Sage 4 Damasteel: Native 5 40th Anniversary VG-10: Delica 25th Anniversary N690Co: PITS XHP: Chaparral Birdseye Maple
RdKill
Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2025 10:16 pm

Re: China

#288

Post by RdKill »

Maybe a blade steel that doesn't scratch getting out of the packaging? ****MOV is tired. A LOT of good quality budget EDC knives come out of China with decent enough steel. Nitro-V would be an upgrade that shouldn't break the bank. Hit us up with a semi-premium Chines knife with a frame or compression lock and maybe SPY-27 or something? I'd buy one.
RdKill
Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2025 10:16 pm

Re: China

#289

Post by RdKill »

It might be worth waiting three years. Hopefully, these tariffs go the way of ...the other dodo.
User avatar
sal
Member
Posts: 18150
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Golden, Colorado USA

Re: China

#290

Post by sal »

Hi RdKill,

Welcome to our forum.

sal
User avatar
Synov
Member
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2024 6:09 pm

Re: China

#291

Post by Synov »

BornIn1500 wrote:
Tue Nov 11, 2025 12:47 pm
Synov wrote:
Tue Nov 11, 2025 3:43 am

The average tariff on US exports was less than 2% before the tariff war.
The median tariff rate worldwide is currently 2.6%. The US tariff rate is 1.5%, which remains one of the lowest in the world. If you remember, in 2018, all non-sanctioned countries were offered a zero tariff deal where if they’d drop their tariffs against the US, than we wouldn’t impose tariffs against those countries or would drop those already imposed. Those countries didn't accept the deal. So it's fairly obvious who is/was trying to take advantage of who here.
You seem to be referring to the tariff rate on US imports, but your number is not current. I'm talking about the rate on US exports imposed by other countries, which is miniscule compared to what we now impose on them. Even worse, there is an inverse correlation between how much a country tariffs us vs how much we currently tariff that country.

https://www.cato.org/blog/please-stop-c ... al-tariffs
Visualizing the Tradeoff of Higher Hardness
S90V: Nirvana Military 2 CF Native 5 Fluted CF Manix XL CF Yojumbo CF Shaman CF Sage 6 CF Native Chief CF MagnaCut: Native 5 Fluted Ti PM2 Crucible CPM-154/S90V: Manix 2 CF 15V: PM2 Marble CF 4V: Manix 2 Marble CF 3V: Tuff REX 121: Sage 5 CF 20CV: Subvert CF ZDP-189: Dragonfly 2 Nishijin S30V: Sage 4 Damasteel: Native 5 40th Anniversary VG-10: Delica 25th Anniversary N690Co: PITS XHP: Chaparral Birdseye Maple
User avatar
Naperville
Member
Posts: 6060
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 1:58 am
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: China

#292

Post by Naperville »

Synov wrote:
Wed Nov 12, 2025 1:07 am
BornIn1500 wrote:
Tue Nov 11, 2025 12:47 pm
Synov wrote:
Tue Nov 11, 2025 3:43 am

The average tariff on US exports was less than 2% before the tariff war.
The median tariff rate worldwide is currently 2.6%. The US tariff rate is 1.5%, which remains one of the lowest in the world. If you remember, in 2018, all non-sanctioned countries were offered a zero tariff deal where if they’d drop their tariffs against the US, than we wouldn’t impose tariffs against those countries or would drop those already imposed. Those countries didn't accept the deal. So it's fairly obvious who is/was trying to take advantage of who here.
You seem to be referring to the tariff rate on US imports, but your number is not current. I'm talking about the rate on US exports imposed by other countries, which is miniscule compared to what we now impose on them. Even worse, there is an inverse correlation between how much a country tariffs us vs how much we currently tariff that country.

https://www.cato.org/blog/please-stop-c ... al-tariffs
Are you located in China? China is waging an economic war against The West. Unless YOU want to be enslaved by the CCP, I'd change your tune.

I just read that China has given $230 billion in government subsidies since 2009 to Chinese EV manufacturers.

China is in the WTO and the rest of the WTO is competing against a country's assets, not small little EV manufacturers.
I Support: VFW; USO; Navy SEAL Foundation, SEAL Jason Redman; America’s Warrior Partnership; Second Amendment Foundation(SAF); Gun Owners of America(GOA); Firearms Policy Coalition(FPC); Knife Rights; The Dog Aging Institute; Longevity Biotech Fellowship;
User avatar
Danke
Member
Posts: 1080
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2015 10:05 pm

Re: China

#293

Post by Danke »

RdKill wrote:
Wed Nov 12, 2025 12:39 am
It might be worth waiting three years. Hopefully, these tariffs go the way of ...the other dodo.
You mean they'll vanish except for special editions thanks to Blade HQ and St. Nicks?
User avatar
Synov
Member
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2024 6:09 pm

Re: China

#294

Post by Synov »

Naperville wrote:
Wed Nov 12, 2025 5:37 pm
Synov wrote:
Wed Nov 12, 2025 1:07 am
BornIn1500 wrote:
Tue Nov 11, 2025 12:47 pm
Synov wrote:
Tue Nov 11, 2025 3:43 am

The average tariff on US exports was less than 2% before the tariff war.
The median tariff rate worldwide is currently 2.6%. The US tariff rate is 1.5%, which remains one of the lowest in the world. If you remember, in 2018, all non-sanctioned countries were offered a zero tariff deal where if they’d drop their tariffs against the US, than we wouldn’t impose tariffs against those countries or would drop those already imposed. Those countries didn't accept the deal. So it's fairly obvious who is/was trying to take advantage of who here.
You seem to be referring to the tariff rate on US imports, but your number is not current. I'm talking about the rate on US exports imposed by other countries, which is miniscule compared to what we now impose on them. Even worse, there is an inverse correlation between how much a country tariffs us vs how much we currently tariff that country.

https://www.cato.org/blog/please-stop-c ... al-tariffs
Are you located in China? China is waging an economic war against The West. Unless YOU want to be enslaved by the CCP, I'd change your tune.

I just read that China has given $230 billion in government subsidies since 2009 to Chinese EV manufacturers.

China is in the WTO and the rest of the WTO is competing against a country's assets, not small little EV manufacturers.
I'm sorry that facts upset you so much that you have to imply that the person stating them is Chinese in order to ignore them. I didn't even say anything about China specifically, I'm talking about the entire world. And no, I won't change my tune (the facts) to suit your political preferences.
Visualizing the Tradeoff of Higher Hardness
S90V: Nirvana Military 2 CF Native 5 Fluted CF Manix XL CF Yojumbo CF Shaman CF Sage 6 CF Native Chief CF MagnaCut: Native 5 Fluted Ti PM2 Crucible CPM-154/S90V: Manix 2 CF 15V: PM2 Marble CF 4V: Manix 2 Marble CF 3V: Tuff REX 121: Sage 5 CF 20CV: Subvert CF ZDP-189: Dragonfly 2 Nishijin S30V: Sage 4 Damasteel: Native 5 40th Anniversary VG-10: Delica 25th Anniversary N690Co: PITS XHP: Chaparral Birdseye Maple
User avatar
Naperville
Member
Posts: 6060
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 1:58 am
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: China

#295

Post by Naperville »

Synov wrote:
Thu Nov 13, 2025 2:00 am
Naperville wrote:
Wed Nov 12, 2025 5:37 pm
Synov wrote:
Wed Nov 12, 2025 1:07 am
BornIn1500 wrote:
Tue Nov 11, 2025 12:47 pm


The median tariff rate worldwide is currently 2.6%. The US tariff rate is 1.5%, which remains one of the lowest in the world. If you remember, in 2018, all non-sanctioned countries were offered a zero tariff deal where if they’d drop their tariffs against the US, than we wouldn’t impose tariffs against those countries or would drop those already imposed. Those countries didn't accept the deal. So it's fairly obvious who is/was trying to take advantage of who here.
You seem to be referring to the tariff rate on US imports, but your number is not current. I'm talking about the rate on US exports imposed by other countries, which is miniscule compared to what we now impose on them. Even worse, there is an inverse correlation between how much a country tariffs us vs how much we currently tariff that country.

https://www.cato.org/blog/please-stop-c ... al-tariffs
Are you located in China? China is waging an economic war against The West. Unless YOU want to be enslaved by the CCP, I'd change your tune.

I just read that China has given $230 billion in government subsidies since 2009 to Chinese EV manufacturers.

China is in the WTO and the rest of the WTO is competing against a country's assets, not small little EV manufacturers.
I'm sorry that facts upset you so much that you have to imply that the person stating them is Chinese in order to ignore them. I didn't even say anything about China specifically, I'm talking about the entire world. And no, I won't change my tune (the facts) to suit your political preferences.
How about these facts.

https://www.foxnews.com/world/china-mov ... s-tensions
Last edited by Naperville on Thu Nov 13, 2025 5:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
I Support: VFW; USO; Navy SEAL Foundation, SEAL Jason Redman; America’s Warrior Partnership; Second Amendment Foundation(SAF); Gun Owners of America(GOA); Firearms Policy Coalition(FPC); Knife Rights; The Dog Aging Institute; Longevity Biotech Fellowship;
User avatar
Mushroom
Member
Posts: 8547
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 1:45 pm
Location: Boston, Ma. U.S.A. Earth

Re: China

#296

Post by Mushroom »

Bye bye thread!

Image
RyanY
Member
Posts: 224
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2022 10:53 pm

Re: China

#297

Post by RyanY »

Mushroom wrote:
Thu Nov 13, 2025 5:19 am
Bye bye thread!

Image
lol, yes, let's please drop the politics. There are plenty of other places to debate these things.
-Ryan
MNOSD member #00053
Red Leader
Member
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2024 9:35 am

Re: China

#298

Post by Red Leader »

Back to knives…again!

I know that their was talk about ‘Spyderco no longer being a leader’ and I don’t think that statement is true. But I will make the argument that at least their the Chinese knife market, it is a tough one to be a leader and not be completely absorbed in only that market. The release cycle alone would completely absorb all manufacturing and R&D energy.

When I think of ‘market leaders’ from that industry sector, I think of brands like Civivi, Kunwu amd Vosteed.

But I don’t think Spyderco needs to be the market leader here. While I do think they need to up the game a bit with materials and options (like better steels and the compression lock), having just a few extremely high quality, competitive offerings will ensure that they stay relevant to people looking for a great budget option without feeling the need to be king of the hill in the Chinese knife rat race.


That is, until they find a way to permanently manufacture their value knives in places other than China (like the Chicago model) because I still believe that having even some of their knives made there is a short term gain, long term loss.
User avatar
TkoK83Spy
Member
Posts: 13409
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2018 5:32 pm
Location: Syracuse, NY

Re: China

#299

Post by TkoK83Spy »

Mushroom wrote:
Thu Nov 13, 2025 5:19 am
Bye bye thread!

Image
Are we the least bit surprised?? Of course we're not!
-Rick
User avatar
Naperville
Member
Posts: 6060
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 1:58 am
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: China

#300

Post by Naperville »

GM just ordered all parts suppliers in their global inventory to drop any business dealings with China. They want a clean supply chain.

https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/intern ... ains-china
I Support: VFW; USO; Navy SEAL Foundation, SEAL Jason Redman; America’s Warrior Partnership; Second Amendment Foundation(SAF); Gun Owners of America(GOA); Firearms Policy Coalition(FPC); Knife Rights; The Dog Aging Institute; Longevity Biotech Fellowship;
Post Reply