The only issue that makes end grain boards harder is that they tend to get ripped apart if you run them through a planner. The blades on the tool can catch the grain tearing it out. Most woodworks have a planer readily available and is a go to tool for flattening.Mage7 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2024 8:20 pmWell, not sure I would call 2007 cutting edge science...RustyIron wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:15 pm
In the hallowed name of Science, I call shenanigans on this Old Wives' Tale.
I don't want to sound unduly cynical, but in my experience, if something looks like ħœřşẽpøø, and smells like ħœřşẽpøø, then there's a fairly good chance that it's ħœřşẽpøø. It could be zebra, but you don't see too many of those stripped beasts roaming the streets of SoCal. Regardless, the anecdotes of the antibacterial properties of wood cutting boards leave me holding my nose.
I refer you to "Bacterial adherence and viability on cutting board surfaces," in the April 2007 Journal of Food Safety.
Abstract
The adherence and viability of Escherichia coli inoculated onto the surfaces of plastic cutting boards and new and used wood cutting boards were evaluated. Most of the inoculum was recovered from all surfaces after resident drying times of 5 min and from plastic surfaces at 24 h. When the exposure time was extended to 2 h, > 90% of the cells placed on new and used dry wood surfaces were not recovered after vigorous rinsing. Scanning electron microscopy showed that the bacteria resided within the structural xylem fibers and vegetative elements of the wood. After resident drying times of up to 2 h, almost 75% of the adherent bacteria on the wood surfaces were viable, as defined by a nalidixic acid direct viable count procedure. Microcosm studies showed no intrinsic growth-supporting or toxic properties of the cutting board materials. Bacteria that adhered to plastic surfaces were more easily removed by low-temperature washing than were cells that adhered to wood surfaces. These studies demonstrated that bacteria adhering to wood surfaces resided within the structural and vegetative elements of the wood's xylem tissues and were viable; wood was more retentive than plastic; penetration of the inoculum liquid promoted cell adherence to the wood matrix; and conditioning of wood with water before inoculation interfered with bacterial adherence.
Full article:
https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... d_surfaces
P.S.
I don't care what anyone says. I'm still keeping my wooden cutting boards.
The new theory that I have heard pitched is that specifically end-grain wood boards are anti-microbial because when used in that way, any moisture and bacteria is drawn deep into the grain where it's suffocated and then dried over time as the air wicks the moisture out. Conversely, using a board with the side of the grain exposed means shoving bacteria in under long, lateral stretches of material that stay moist longer because they're lawyered on top of each other.
Though, wouldn't you know it, end-grain boards are a lot harder to manufacture and everyone saying all that is selling some.
If you have a drum sander it’s an easy task, but most hobbyist woodworks don’t have these. If you don’t it just takes more time to finish with something like a belt sander.
End grain is better as the board is much harder, resisting knife cutting into the board just due to grain orientation.