vivi wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2024 11:41 am
Flash wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2024 10:59 am
That’s 4 so far in favour of the Frontier Valley design.
…Go on Spyderco make it happen.

I would hate to see them do their own take on that knife
without scaling up the overall size 10-20%
No knife makes me dislike my genetics more than the Frontier Valley. It's as close to perfect as I've found for a light to medium duty EDC fixed blade. Lovely blade shape, no sharpening notch, nice grind, comes in some steels with really nice sharpening response, fairly priced, etc.
But it's a 3.5 finger grip for me, which is why I sold off all the ones I owned.
Another change it needs in my eyes, is contouring the front of the scales to the tang for better pinch grip ergonomics.
Other than those two nitpicks it's pretty much perfect in my eyes. I'd personally lose the lanyard hole but I know knife companies would never go for that.
The Frontier Valley has very similar dimensions to the TOPS Mini Scandi which I got to handle before sending it back to the dealer because it had an uneven grind. It deffinitely is too small for a full grip, but I pretty much accept that that size of knife isn't meant to have a great grip, it is meant to be small, which makes it easier to carry, but less functional. I replaced the TOPS with an Izula for that role, and while the grip isn't great on the Izula either, it plays it's role well for me. This is all to say that I think this size knife has it's place, it just isn't a general use blade for me.
So in a way I feel like I can echo what you are saying Vivi. What is funny, is that despite the fact that I have very small, slender hands, one of my biggest beefs with many fixed blades is that they don't have a long enough handle. I don't like handles that just fit, I want a little wiggle room.
So Vivi, I'm curious, if you were scale up the Frontier Valley, how long do you think the handle should be?