Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:51 pm
My new Pingo is a slicing DEMON. Did not think I would like it this much. Love the LBHB and my SS Dfly, and will definitely find a way to grab one of the 2 Lavas at my local shop
That PINGO is one that appeals to me as well. I've never got to hold one or test drive one yet but I would like to. I also liked it big brother the Rock Lobster. It's a very interesting blade design>> it's sort of along the lines of a type of rescue knife. But with a sharp edge I can see that blade capable of a lot of uses.twinboysdad wrote:My new Pingo is a slicing DEMON. Did not think I would like it this much. Love the LBHB and my SS Dfly, and will definitely find a way to grab one of the 2 Lavas at my local shop
Hey that's really cool that you got one of those Golden Colorado USA Earth made Meerkats with the 440C blade. You don't see them around much anymore. That truly has been a collector's piece for quite some time now. I wish they would have made all of that model in the Golden CO plant. You don't see those solid blade Q models much anymore either.GoldenSpydie wrote:I love all Spydies...little or big, they're all superb!
Here is are some of mine that I guess would qualify as small.
(counter clockwise, starting at bottom)
440C Meerkat, Leafstorm, Squash Bone Kopa, C19 BT Jr., Michael Walker Lightweight, solid blade "Q," modified regular "Q," CF Dodo
Thanks. I overpaid to get that one, but it was worth it, as I've only ever seen one other USA Meerkat for sale. As you might know, my goal is to own every folding manual knife ever made in Golden.JD Spydo wrote:Hey that's really cool that you got one of those Golden Colorado USA Earth made Meerkats with the 440C blade. You don't see them around much anymore. That truly has been a collector's piece for quite some time now. I wish they would have made all of that model in the Golden CO plant. You don't see those solid blade Q models much anymore either.
You're totally right--they offer more (and better, of course) "LBKs" and keychain knives than any other company I know of. There are so many awesome folders under 3" in the Spyder lineup. :)JD Spydo wrote: Hey I like all Spyders too>> but with this thread I was just emphasizing that they truly are unequaled in the area of small blades. They have taken small blades to another level like no other company has that I've seen. Great batch of Spyders you have there.
Spyderco also made baby Goddard with micarta scales.JD Spydo wrote:I'm not sure if the Burgundy Micarta Jester was the only super-small Spyder with a Micarta handle but I've not seen many of them.
You're not hijacking the thread at all "Tdog" :) I also like many of Spyderco's vast selection and I own many of their vast selection as well. But what I'm basically saying and there are a few folks that seem to agree with me that Spyderco has truly taken the concept of the small bladed knife to a whole new level. The Dodo for instance is completely different that what any other commercial knife company has ever done up till now.Tdog wrote:Sorry, not trying to hijack the thread. I would say "Spyderco is the Undisputed King of Production Knives." I only like the small ones, mid-sized, large, and fixed blade Spydies![]()
Rick, I had almost forgotten my G-10 Jester, thank you for the reminder. Like classic and timeless music, Spyderco does masterful variations on a theme. Theirs is a symphony in steel.SpaceInvader wrote:> That said, I don't know if they are "undisputed". On a literal level ...
I agree; another area of dispute would be, for lack of a better way of putting it, gents bling. Consider for example the AMK Osprey. It's a traditional folder that pushes no boundaries in blade or handle design. Handle options include stainless, micarta, pearl, abalone, stag and wood, so you can get as much bling as you want. As a company, AMK has more than a little old school cred, an intangible quality validated by the prices realized for its combat/military designs, e.g., the smatchet.
But here we concentrate on little knives, so to compare apples to apples in approximate size, let's compare Osprey to Jester:
Osprey
Blade steel: AUS-8A
Blade length: 1 5/8"
Length open: 4"
Length closed: 2 5/16"
Blade thickness: 3/32"
Jester
Blade steel: VG-10
Blade length: 1.93"
Length open: 4.37"
Length closed: 2.44"
Blade thickness: .08"
Commonly called keychain knives, if it's in your pocket on a ring with keys, you could discount most of the Osprey's bling options as impractical. But if you don't happen to carry it that way, you might like the Osprey's bling options as well as its traditional design. Thus, 'undisputed' might be a bit too sweeping a term, a lot of people like traditional designs and materials.
I considered both knives but for me the Jester's blade trumps the Osprey's bling options. I also favor Spydercos because they feature more of what you might call modern material bling, even though that has yet been fully realized in the Jester's handle in my view.
This topic draws out a person's favorite little knife, Spyderco or otherwise. Mine has changed over the years as follows:
Loveless city knife --> CRK Umfaan --> Jester
I should qualify this -- I prefer the last Jester sprint with liners and G-10 more than versions with FRN or micarta. I'll still pick up a couple of the next FRN sprint, but dream of a Jester with carbon fiber or titanium, that's my kind of bling.
-Rick
Yeah I forgot about that baby Goddard. I had a few of those Goddards at one time and the ones I liked the best were the Gray VG-10 versions.bh49 wrote:Spyderco also made baby Goddard with micarta scales.
Not a very fair comparison in my humble opinion.SpaceInvader wrote:> That said, I don't know if they are "undisputed". On a literal level ...
I agree; another area of dispute would be, for lack of a better way of putting it, gents bling. Consider for example the AMK Osprey. It's a traditional folder that pushes no boundaries in blade or handle design. Handle options include stainless, micarta, pearl, abalone, stag and wood, so you can get as much bling as you want. As a company, AMK has more than a little old school cred, an intangible quality validated by the prices realized for its combat/military designs, e.g., the smatchet.
But here we concentrate on little knives, so to compare apples to apples in approximate size, let's compare Osprey to Jester:
Osprey
Blade steel: AUS-8A
Blade length: 1 5/8"
Length open: 4"
Length closed: 2 5/16"
Blade thickness: 3/32"
Jester
Blade steel: VG-10
Blade length: 1.93"
Length open: 4.37"
Length closed: 2.44"
Blade thickness: .08"
Commonly called keychain knives, if it's in your pocket on a ring with keys, you could discount most of the Osprey's bling options as impractical. But if you don't happen to carry it that way, you might like the Osprey's bling options as well as its traditional design. Thus, 'undisputed' might be a bit too sweeping a term, a lot of people like traditional designs and materials.
I considered both knives but for me the Jester's blade trumps the Osprey's bling options. I also favor Spydercos because they feature more of what you might call modern material bling, even though that has yet been fully realized in the Jester's handle in my view.
This topic draws out a person's favorite little knife, Spyderco or otherwise. Mine has changed over the years as follows:
Loveless city knife --> CRK Umfaan --> Jester
I should qualify this -- I prefer the last Jester sprint with liners and G-10 more than versions with FRN or micarta. I'll still pick up a couple of the next FRN sprint, but dream of a Jester with carbon fiber or titanium, that's my kind of bling.
-Rick
I must say "GoldenSpydie" you have made some excellent points and your comparison of Spyderco to Al Mar knives is not only interesting but a very succinct comparison needless to say. As many of you know I'm particularly a big fan of many of the past models. That's because many of the past models have paved the way for the great blades we have on the main line up today.GoldenSpydie wrote:Not a very fair comparison in my humble opinion.
Maybe it would be better to compare the Al Mar to a Kopa.
16 classy handle decorations if I remember correctly, which is twice as many as Al Mar offers in the Osprey. Or what about the C27 Jess Horn? One of the classiest knives ever made if you ask me, complete with a thumb depression (not a hole), bone handles, and plenty of "bling."
Now it is true that both of the above examples are discontinued, but they are still Spydercos. And as far as variety, Spyderco wins again. From the traditional C27, to the budget "Q," to the many variations of the Kopa, to the modern "tactical" reverse-S dodo, Spyderco has it covered. They even have slipjoints taken care of--Pingo, Spy-DK, UKPK, Squeak.
:spyder: :) :spyder:
You mean like this one? :) I agree, JD, these are some classic Spydies.JD Spydo wrote:I will go on record as to proclaiming that I would bet that probably only one out of 50 Spyderheads even know that this one super classic ever even existed>> that model I'm speaking of is the SPUR. The SPUR is a small version of the classic PROGRIP. It's as though Spyderco themselves tried to hide it from everyone>> I do know that isn't the case but it does seem that way.
Just like the stainless handled RESCUE is a hidden classic among Spyderedged blades the SPUR is truly a hidden classic in the small blade sector.
I've owned a couple of them and deeply regret trading them. It was extremely handy for a small blade and very versatile.