Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2002 3:19 pm
Scolby,
Custom Knives are too rich for my blood. I have many, many Spyderco knives. Most; the majority of them, are nearly flawless and good enough for my simple tastes. I was a collector for awhile. What got this mess of a topic started was that my last three collector pieces were rough. Now when I paid top dollar and then had all three rough knives sitting there next to each other it made me wonder what is going on in Golden. One one knive; the Meerkat, Sal said heads rolled because of the way they were being purveyed. On the SPOT, Sal informs us, production has stopped because of the negative feedback; so he must care about the way we feel about these issues. On the Impala, Sal says he can't figure out how to dress the rough area. Fair enough. Folks get upset when they read negative posts on Spyderco product. If no one ever tells them they have a problem, perhaps it goes un-noticed, or untreated. Sometimes you just can't go on blind faith. Not anymore.
It is apparent that Sal does care and is striving for excellence. He cares about his customer base.
One thing: A collector might sound off-base , and too picky by pointing out flaws, roughness and quirks in Spyderco Knives here on this forum. Consider that if I can see these imperfections. then so can anyone. You'll never get feedback from someone in a store who picks up such a knive at the knife counter, see the roughness, and puts the knive back down and goes on shopping. That is a lost sale. If I speak out and Sal fixes something, then he may reap future sales.
I hear what you say about the Custom Knives being perfect. In a way I have done what you said:
"PUT YOUR MONEY WHERE YOUR CRITICISM IS!!!".
I resigned from the Spyderco Colletor's Program. Sal suggested that later-run knives will likely be better. So when I see an interesting model come out, I'll check them out after they have been in production a while. Then if I find a nice one, I'll invest.
Edited so that it hopefully makes more sense .
Edited by - just me on 11/25/2002 4:54:49 PM
Custom Knives are too rich for my blood. I have many, many Spyderco knives. Most; the majority of them, are nearly flawless and good enough for my simple tastes. I was a collector for awhile. What got this mess of a topic started was that my last three collector pieces were rough. Now when I paid top dollar and then had all three rough knives sitting there next to each other it made me wonder what is going on in Golden. One one knive; the Meerkat, Sal said heads rolled because of the way they were being purveyed. On the SPOT, Sal informs us, production has stopped because of the negative feedback; so he must care about the way we feel about these issues. On the Impala, Sal says he can't figure out how to dress the rough area. Fair enough. Folks get upset when they read negative posts on Spyderco product. If no one ever tells them they have a problem, perhaps it goes un-noticed, or untreated. Sometimes you just can't go on blind faith. Not anymore.
It is apparent that Sal does care and is striving for excellence. He cares about his customer base.
One thing: A collector might sound off-base , and too picky by pointing out flaws, roughness and quirks in Spyderco Knives here on this forum. Consider that if I can see these imperfections. then so can anyone. You'll never get feedback from someone in a store who picks up such a knive at the knife counter, see the roughness, and puts the knive back down and goes on shopping. That is a lost sale. If I speak out and Sal fixes something, then he may reap future sales.
I hear what you say about the Custom Knives being perfect. In a way I have done what you said:
"PUT YOUR MONEY WHERE YOUR CRITICISM IS!!!".
I resigned from the Spyderco Colletor's Program. Sal suggested that later-run knives will likely be better. So when I see an interesting model come out, I'll check them out after they have been in production a while. Then if I find a nice one, I'll invest.
Edited so that it hopefully makes more sense .
Edited by - just me on 11/25/2002 4:54:49 PM