Gayle Bradley "latest version"

[ncrockclimb]

I just saw a note on Cutlery Shop website stating that Gayle Bradley "LATEST VERSION - 5.3 OUNCES VS. OLD VERSION AT 5.5 OUNCES." I was wondering if anyone knows exactly when this change took place and what caused the .2 oz reduction in weight. Also, is the "latest version" significantly better or worse in any way that then "old version."

Thanks for any info that you might have!

BTW, here is the link to the page:
http://www.cutleryshoppe.com/sage-carbo ... ock-1.aspx" target="_blank

[rycen]

The change was made shortly after the model was released so it's been quite a while. The first versions had a solid steel liners the "latest versions" have drilled steel liners. There are no differences besides the weight.

[jackknifeh]

Does anyone think the .3 oz. makes any difference in a knife this size and weight? I'd see it being important on lighter knives based on .3 oz. being a larger portion of the total weight. I've never really worried about the weight of a knife but it does mean a lot depending on attire. But a small difference like this wouldn't be that different I don't think. That's just me though and we're all different. If that's the only difference I'd be inclined to buy either, especially if one or the other is at a great price. It's for sure one great knife and is in my RRP now. While the M4 holds an edge extremely well I find myself gliding the edge along a SPyderco UF stone just for fun. In this case it's a great stone for two reasons. First it keeps the edge touched up and second, it won't remove much steel like a coarser stone would if I were doing this "just for fun" or relaxation. :)

Jack

[ncrockclimb]

Does anyone think the .3 oz. makes any difference in a knife this size and weight? I'd see it being important on lighter knives based on .3 oz. being a larger portion of the total weight...

Jack

After I posted this I had the exact same thought. .3 oz is really not that big of a deal, but my curiosity got the better of me and I really wanted to know what caused the difference. Regardless, I am really excited about getting this knife!

[Evil D]

Does anyone think the .3 oz. makes any difference in a knife this size and weight? I'd see it being important on lighter knives based on .3 oz. being a larger portion of the total weight. I've never really worried about the weight of a knife but it does mean a lot depending on attire. But a small difference like this wouldn't be that different I don't think. That's just me though and we're all different. If that's the only difference I'd be inclined to buy either, especially if one or the other is at a great price. It's for sure one great knife and is in my RRP now. While the M4 holds an edge extremely well I find myself gliding the edge along a SPyderco UF stone just for fun. In this case it's a great stone for two reasons. First it keeps the edge touched up and second, it won't remove much steel like a coarser stone would if I were doing this "just for fun" or relaxation. :)

Jack

I think it depends a lot on where that .3oz is removed from, as it can offset the balance of the knife towards the handle or blade.

[nccole]

Another thing the first batch with solid liners had going was that they were ran harder and better performers. Don't know if there is any real validity to that though.

[ncrockclimb]

So, when did the change take place? I just ordered one from bladehq. I am wondering if I will get the new or old version.

[rycen]

I don't know exactly when the change was made but as I said it was early on. The one you ordered will be the "new" version.

[ncrockclimb]

Cool! Thanks for the info!

[ABX2011]

I think the drilled liners were a good upgrade. It's still handle-heavy but the balance was improved. The weight reduction, while small is noticeable.

[JNewell]

Another thing the first batch with solid liners had going was that they were ran harder and better performers. Don't know if there is any real validity to that though.

Going by memory, what we know:

- the first version had solid liners
- the first 100 or so knives did not have the GB logo
- knives from the earliest production were reliably tested at 64-65 HRC, much higher than intended (per Sal G.)
- the second version had vented/drilled liners

What we don't know:

- whether Spyderco ever adjusted the HRC range downward
- exact dates for the transition from the first version to the second version