Blerv wrote:It's also possible that each knife has a very tight F&F timeframe and details like sanding the other side would add to the bottom line (and be passed to the customer). It's a stretch of course but one of those details, along with the costs associated, that separate high quality production from customs.
It may well be a cost cutting measure, but that possibility is the very thing that turned me off. If this is the case, it speaks to a manufacturing shortcut, and regarding your distinction between production and custom, the separation doesn't hold water in my experience. I have quite a few production folders from different makers: Benchmade, Buck, CRKT, ESEE, Hogue, Ka-Bar, Kershaw, including multiples of many of these brands and probably a few others I'm forgetting. I also own ZT's and Sebenzas, though granted, these are more expensive knives. Regardless, I've not seen such rough parts on internals in any of the brands I've named.
Now this is an interesting idea to me--the notion that there could be a cultural rationale for a certain "technique." If so, like you, I would love to hear confirmation from Spyderco. As I posted before, however, none of my other Seki City knives exhibit such finish.Blerv wrote:I have a very limited understanding of Japanese culture but see a high level of pride and at times pragmatism. What might be common sense to us (adding washers, screwed construction, polishing lockbars/liners, sanding the opening hole, etc) might not even be on their radar. Maybe it's how they have made lockbacks for almost a hundred years? The insight provided on many occasions by Sal is always a welcomed glimpse into their blade-making culture. :)
Mr Blonde wrote:FWIW, this type of finish on the internal part of the lockbar is what I'm used to as well in my Kiwis and some other spydies.
Looking like a pattern. Thanks for the confirmations.jabba359 wrote:Just checked my Kiwi4. Looks the same as the OP's knife.
Perhaps. You could be right. I was reading the thread chronologically and saw the "Yes" as a response to Blerv's "Is that a shot from the inside of the knife?", followed by araneae's distinction between himself/herself and "some people." The curt nature of the response could disguise possible well-intentions, and only araneae knows if s/he meant to jab or not. You're correct that I was wrong to make assumptions, and I can see where I may have misinterpreted.tvenuto wrote:I'm not araneae, but he appears to be responding, albeit quickly, to your question. He has seen this level of fit and finish, and it doesn't bother him so he would keep the knife. It's difficult to imply tone from an internet post, so I find it's best to not assume the worst.
Thank you for the measured reply. Yes, I can return the knife for a refund. I am disappointed because I waited for so long for the knife to come out, and even moreso because this thread suggests the finish to be normative rather than indicative of a lemon. If it were an anomaly, a simple exchange would be an easy fix.tvenuto wrote:You mentioned that for you, this was more of a form knife, so I can see how this F&F might be a let down. Hopefully your dealer gets back to you with good news.