MT17P - Mule Team Fixed Blade featuring K390

A place to share your experience with our Mule Team knives.
DunninLA
Member
Posts: 120
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:32 am

#141

Post by DunninLA »

P.S. Now that I'm getting closer and closer to ordering one of these before they're gone, can anybody tell me why the spyderco website lists Mule Team projects 1-13, then 15-17, but no Mule Team 14? In this forum, somebody said that in spyder bites it was indicated that #14 would be in CTS-204P (which somebody else said was like M390). But, I don't see any mule #14, or any Mule in CTS-204P. Thanks
sir_mike
Member
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 1:31 pm
Location: Michigan

#142

Post by sir_mike »

DunninLA wrote:P.S. Now that I'm getting closer and closer to ordering one of these before they're gone, can anybody tell me why the spyderco website lists Mule Team projects 1-13, then 15-17, but no Mule Team 14? In this forum, somebody said that in spyder bites it was indicated that #14 would be in CTS-204P (which somebody else said was like M390). But, I don't see any mule #14, or any Mule in CTS-204P. Thanks
IIRC...somewhere on this thread I believe someone posted that the Mule 14 was cancelled because they had some issue with it so it was never released. :) I am sure someone will correct me if I miss quoted! :D
thurin
Member
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:40 pm
Location: Broomfield, CO

#143

Post by thurin »

kbuzbee wrote:ALL of my kitchen knives are non stainless /carbon steel. Old Fosters Bros, new Roselli, Opinel.... They work just fine.

Ken
I agree Ken. I use my Super Blue Caly in the kitchen all the time. And I have an 01 Kitchen knife. Having a patina on a knife doesn't hurt it's ability in the kitchen.
DunninLA wrote:I think the difference is that non-stainless high carbon steel develops a patina, and therefore a "uniform" staining that doesn't detract from its look. However, some of these exotics I've read, when they stain, they also pit, and it doesn't look good and also detracts from its function.
I personally think some of the staining you see in the "show your patina" thread ( including my own ;) ) here look awesome and am not sure how it detracts from function or looks

To each their own.
Not all those who wander are lost - J.R.R.T.
mattman
Member
Posts: 1443
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:06 pm
Location: Central NY

#144

Post by mattman »

sir_mike wrote:IIRC...somewhere on this thread I believe someone posted that the Mule 14 was cancelled because they had some issue with it so it was never released. :) I am sure someone will correct me if I miss quoted! :D
I don't believe it has been cancelled... just delayed. It has happened before. (I can't remember which ones specifically, but this certainly isn't the first time they didn't get released in numerical order...)
DunninLA
Member
Posts: 120
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:32 am

#145

Post by DunninLA »

^ I don't know if it would make senseanymore to use CTS 204P in a Mule Team project since Spyderco already released the Southard in CTS-204p. Isn't the Mule Team project suppose to precede a release of a production knife using the same steel?
dcoffe01
Member
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 4:54 pm
Location: Howell, Mi

#146

Post by dcoffe01 »

No, I think the purpose of the mule is to give a lot of people the ability to try out different steels with the same blade shape.

Dan
User avatar
JNewell
Member
Posts: 5076
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Land of the Bean and the Cod

#147

Post by JNewell »

mattman wrote:I don't believe it has been cancelled... just delayed. It has happened before. (I can't remember which ones specifically, but this certainly isn't the first time they didn't get released in numerical order...)
That is also my recollection of where that got left.
DunninLA wrote:^ I don't know if it would make senseanymore to use CTS 204P in a Mule Team project since Spyderco already released the Southard in CTS-204p. Isn't the Mule Team project suppose to precede a release of a production knife using the same steel?
Not at all, most of the Mules have been in steels that Spyderco has already used. The goal is to provide a platform that takes all the other variables out of the equation and allows a relatively pure comparison of steels.
mattman
Member
Posts: 1443
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:06 pm
Location: Central NY

#148

Post by mattman »

DunninLA wrote:^ I don't know if it would make senseanymore to use CTS 204P in a Mule Team project since Spyderco already released the Southard in CTS-204p. Isn't the Mule Team project suppose to precede a release of a production knife using the same steel?


not necessarily. for testing purposes, the edge geometry/thinness/length have much more to importance when comparing performance, so, by producing a Mule, the testing if the alloy can continue.

edited to add quote, as others posted in the meantime... :)
DunninLA
Member
Posts: 120
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:32 am

#149

Post by DunninLA »

^ OK, thanks. I had misunderstood the purpose of the Mule Team releases.

Back to K390 -- I found this old thread in the Spyderco section of Bladeforums. Salimoneous was correct in his memory that he had read somewhere (see below) that K390 is similar in corrosive resistance to M4. http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showt ... tary/page3 see post #57


-------------------------------
10-07-2011, 12:14 PM #57 OTK KnifeMaker / Craftsman / Service Provider

Just saw this thread after a buddy alerted me of it.

I've made a few out of K390 and minus corrosion resistance it is probably the highest performing blade steel out there. It is super wear resistant ...way more than s90 but the big difference is toughness. It is much tougher than 10v or the high vanadium stainless. Corrosion is about like M4.


Also at bladeforums.com, Phil Wilson reported on K390, indicating that after he dressed a couple of mule dear, and left the blade uncleaned, it developed a patina, but no rusting or pitting. He then cautions against using K390 in wet climates, or salt water. http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showt ... st10060601

-----------------
10-03-2011, #22 Phil Wilson
I can give some feedback on K390 based on one finished knife that I now have in my kit. I took it on a recent Mule deer hunt in Utah and it saw most of the duty from field dressing to cutting and trimming to vac pack in the freezer on two Mule deer. ... I was concerned about corrosion resistance. So far the blade has a slight patina and no rust or pits. I left it “as is” after field dressing the last deer on the trip home just to see what would happen. ----------


So, bottom line, I can live with patina, but not rusting or pitting, so I'm now leaning toward purchasing the K390 mule, assuming any are left tomorrow, and using it a few times in the kitchen.
mattman
Member
Posts: 1443
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:06 pm
Location: Central NY

#150

Post by mattman »

mattman wrote:I don't believe it has been cancelled... just delayed. It has happened before. (I can't remember which ones specifically, but this certainly isn't the first time they didn't get released in numerical order...)
I wa curious, so I checked over at Spydiewiki, and MT08 and MT09 were skipped, then went back to after the release of MT10.

http://www.spydiewiki.com/index.php?title=MT_Mule_Team
Yotee
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 7:56 pm

#151

Post by Yotee »

Hey All and Especially Sal,

Been lurking here almost 6 months, reading the info etc. Then, secretly, I got my first Spyderco (didn't want my Cold Steels etc to know), then another .... and another. Well it's time to come out of the closet: I bought 2 Mules and I'm glad!!! My Recon 1 will probably never open right for me again but at 6.8 ozs it probably will never see my pocket again either. All 3 of my Spydys together don't add up to 6.8 ozs.

Just wanted to share the joy and say thanks to all, especially Sal, for all the help these last few months. Now I have to go back to thinking about my Mules. Later Guys
User avatar
Holland
Member
Posts: 7575
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:37 pm
Location: Alberta

#152

Post by Holland »

Yotee wrote:Hey All and Especially Sal,

Been lurking here almost 6 months, reading the info etc. Then, secretly, I got my first Spyderco (didn't want my Cold Steels etc to know), then another .... and another. Well it's time to come out of the closet: I bought 2 Mules and I'm glad!!! My Recon 1 will probably never open right for me again but at 6.8 ozs it probably will never see my pocket again either. All 3 of my Spydys together don't add up to 6.8 ozs.

Just wanted to share the joy and say thanks to all, especially Sal, for all the help these last few months. Now I have to go back to thinking about my Mules. Later Guys
your making me curious now, I think you need to share a picture of ur collection :D
-Spencer

Rotation:
Gayle Bradley 2 | Mantra 1 | Watu | Chaparral 1 | Dragonfly 2 Salt SE
User avatar
xceptnl
Member
Posts: 9000
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:48 pm
Location: Tobacco Country, Virginia
Contact:

#153

Post by xceptnl »

Yotee wrote:Hey All and Especially Sal,

Been lurking here almost 6 months, reading the info etc. Then, secretly, I got my first Spyderco (didn't want my Cold Steels etc to know), then another .... and another. Well it's time to come out of the closet: I bought 2 Mules and I'm glad!!! My Recon 1 will probably never open right for me again but at 6.8 ozs it probably will never see my pocket again either. All 3 of my Spydys together don't add up to 6.8 ozs.

Just wanted to share the joy and say thanks to all, especially Sal, for all the help these last few months. Now I have to go back to thinking about my Mules. Later Guys
Welcome to the forum and I agree with Holland, we need to see this collection.
Image
sal wrote: .... even today, we design a knife from the edge out!
*Landon*
User avatar
Ankerson
Member
Posts: 7587
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 1:23 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

#154

Post by Ankerson »

gbelleh wrote:How about K390 as a kitchen knife?
Should work just fine. :)
capid1
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:26 pm

#155

Post by capid1 »

Here's a copy and paste of a test I did between 10V and K390. In no way is it super accurate but it gives you an idea of what they can do

I gathered up 10 boxes and cut each in half to make sure each knife cut the same boxes. I also added whittling of some aspen I had laying around to test toughness and observe for any edge chipping.
Each knife was sharpened to 9micron using diamond PSA on my EP at 25deg inclusive. Both push cut phone book paper with ease before starting the test.

Just to be clear, this is a steel comparison. I'm not comparing makers :)

Both are nearly identical in respects to alloy makeup and design but there are some subtle differences…

K390 at 63rc FFG (Loveless style blade by David Williamson (OTK)
Carbon: 2.45%
Chromium: 4.15%
Cobalt: 2.00%
Molybdenum: 3.75%
Tungsten: 1.00%
Vanadium: 9.00%

Knife Specs:
Blade length: 3.5in
Spine thickness: .114in
Width: 1.2in
Behind the edge: .014

10V at 64rc FFG (EDC by Big Chris)
Carbon: 2.45%
Molybdenum: 1.3%
Chromium: 5.25%
Vanadium: 9.75%

Knife Specs:
Blade length: 3.55in
Spine thickness: .130in
Width: 1.1in
Behind the edge: .014

And now on to the pics…

Image
Image
Image
Image
Some of the cardboard I used. This stuff is TOUGH!
Image
And the aftermath…
capid1
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:26 pm

#156

Post by capid1 »

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

10V edge

Image


K390 edge

Image

Both performed exceptionally well which I expected ;) At the end of the test both would slice notebook (not phone book) paper no problem but when examining the edge you can notice very minor rolling of the edge on the 10V but not on the K390. A few swipes on my strop with boron carbide brought the edge back in line.
If I learned anything from this test is that if anyone uses these steels to a point where the really need a good sharpening I salute you.
User avatar
sal
Member
Posts: 18069
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Golden, Colorado USA

#157

Post by sal »

Hi Yotee and Capid1,

Welcome to our forum.

sal
capid1
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:26 pm

#158

Post by capid1 »

Thank you Sal!
User avatar
Evil D
Member
Posts: 28463
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 9:48 pm
Location: Northern KY

#159

Post by Evil D »

In case you guys missed this http://www.spyderco.com/forums/showthre ... post871435
sal wrote:The one I tested on the handle was 62/64.

sal
~David
Lobo.joe
Member
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 10:46 pm
Location: Littleton, CO

#160

Post by Lobo.joe »

mattman wrote:I don't believe it has been cancelled... just delayed. It has happened before. (I can't remember which ones specifically, but this certainly isn't the first time they didn't get released in numerical order...)
I was up at SFO yesterday picking up the new Mule and they mentioned that the CTS 204P had some production issues and are now just laying in wait. Hopefully they will still be released at some point, I love that steel in the Southard package.
Lobo.joe

:spyder: Manix 2, native, native 5, dragonfly g10, sage 2, sage 4, delica, endura, caly 3 Damascus, caly 3.5, nearly all para 2, CF military, techno, superleaf, tenacious
Post Reply