Well, I knew this would happen upon her final deployment; however, it's sad just the same...
http://news.yahoo.com/uss-enterprise-ca ... 22506.html
The world's first nuclear powered aircraft carrier, U.S.S. Enterprise, is retired.
The Department of Defense and U.S. Navy certainly got their money's worth with this fine ship. Sad that Enterprise can't be preserved. This'll be the second U.S. aircraft carrier named Enterprise that won't be preserved.
Gotta say that the name, Enterprise, does seem to be bestowed upon those vessels that are the "first" of their kind.
Farewell, Enterprise! You served your country, your crew, and your name with honor!
Farewell, U.S.S. Enterprise
Farewell, U.S.S. Enterprise
Spyderco WTC #1044
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” George Santayana, The Life of Reason: The Phases of Human Progress, 1905 to 1906
NEVER FORGET!!!
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” George Santayana, The Life of Reason: The Phases of Human Progress, 1905 to 1906
NEVER FORGET!!!
do we get one more boat before a starship
i was on the last cruise of the guam and the first of the baton
i was on the last cruise of the guam and the first of the baton
Lloyd R Harner III (Butch)
a step forward
working my way to a licence to drill
http://www.harnerknives.com
a step forward
working my way to a licence to drill
http://www.harnerknives.com
- The Mastiff
- Member
- Posts: 5951
- Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 2:53 am
- Location: raleigh nc
I know she had to go eventually but I never like retiring large units needed for our defense before the replacement is ready.
I recall when 15 carrier battle groups with larger air wings was considered not nearly enough. I guess I'm just still stuck in the cold war but I always prefer going into any negotiations from a position of strength.
It's too easy to cut a ship due to budget problems when it doesn't exist yet. If we've got by with out it so far we must not need it.
I've seen some "studies" that recommended only 5 carriers with only 3 being active at any one time. Of course there are those that believe we should reduce our nuke levels to 300 or less.
I sure hate to think about people like that getting a chance to run our country.
Joe
I recall when 15 carrier battle groups with larger air wings was considered not nearly enough. I guess I'm just still stuck in the cold war but I always prefer going into any negotiations from a position of strength.
It's too easy to cut a ship due to budget problems when it doesn't exist yet. If we've got by with out it so far we must not need it.
I've seen some "studies" that recommended only 5 carriers with only 3 being active at any one time. Of course there are those that believe we should reduce our nuke levels to 300 or less.
I sure hate to think about people like that getting a chance to run our country.
Joe
"A Mastiff is to a dog what a Lion is to a housecat. He stands alone and all others sink before him. His courage does not exceed temper and generosity, and in attachment he equals the kindest of his race" Cynographia Britannic 1800
"Unless you're the lead dog the view is pretty much gonna stay the same!"
"Unless you're the lead dog the view is pretty much gonna stay the same!"
-
- Member
- Posts: 936
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 7:24 pm