http://gma.yahoo.com/massachusetts-teen ... ories.html
Of course we are responsible for our actions but da**. In this day and age texting is like walking around. Wait... I hope he wasn't on the Spyderco forum.


Jack
Don't know if it would, but it should. The law should cover "distracted driving", not just one specific form of it. Anything which causes you to take your eyes off the road for more than an occasional second should be treated the same. Distracted driving is nothing new, had a boss forty odd years ago who'd do the NY Times crossword puzzle while driving to work.jackknifeh wrote:Texting requires too much time taken off the road and what is going on around us. If I caused an accident and it was determined it was caused because I was digging a burger out of a McDonald's bag would the same laws be broken? This raises questions in my mind. Seems if I cause your loved one to be hurt due to carelessness or neglegence I'm still responsible no matter what I was doing.
Jack
I agree. I bet this will open the door on lots of "distracted driving" situations. I used to listen to a guy talk on the radio who said there weren't any driving "accidents". They were cases when one or more people weren't paying close enough attention. I have seen people in front of me and I could tell they weren't paying attention (texting, phone, whatever) and I allowed enough time for me to respond if they did anything extra stupid. I've been a fault also. I'm not perfect or even close so I'm not judging or pointing fingers. It's just the way things are when we deal with people and I am a people too.The Deacon wrote:Don't know if it would, but it should. The law should cover "distracted driving", not just one specific form of it. Anything which causes you to take your eyes off the road for more than an occasional second should be treated the same. Distracted driving is nothing new, had a boss forty odd years ago who'd do the NY Times crossword puzzle while driving to work.![]()
in pen.The Deacon wrote:had a boss forty odd years ago who'd do the NY Times crossword puzzle while driving to work.![]()
Sue McDonald's for having a drive thru and enabling you to do what you did. At least that what it seems to be coming to these days. I just wish people would take responsibility for their actions, but it's easier to try and blame someone else.jackknifeh wrote: If I caused an accident and it was determined it was caused because I was digging a burger out of a McDonald's bag would the same laws be broken?
Jack
Blerv wrote:
The average person is so marginal at driving it's criminal. Forget apexes of corners and shifting like Vin Diesel in a clever edit job, just going down the road and not killing things. Rain, merging, stopping on dry pavement...all Vegas gambling odds for the droves that fill our highways.
Blerv is SO correct that it is frightening. The people that I see on the roads these days are truly people that have no business picking their own nose let alone behind the wheel of a car...Anonymous wrote:Pretty obvious, would a driving instructor pass you if you were eating and driving? Hell no, he wouldn't. If you kill someone because you were busy doing something else I wish you the worst.
Users browsing this forum: Mike Slayer, Spydergirl88 and 11 guests