K-Bar Combat knife 1095 vs 420J2 steel.

If your topic has nothing to do with Spyderco, you can post it here.
User avatar
Karen
Member
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 11:00 am

K-Bar Combat knife 1095 vs 420J2 steel.

#1

Post by Karen »

I decided to get a couple of K-bar knives. I like the 1095 steel, but am thinking about a stainless version. The "real" k-bars cost about $50 but the stainless copies are $13. How does 420J2 hold up compared to 1095?
:spyder:
yablanowitz
Member
Posts: 7367
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Liberal, Kansas

#2

Post by yablanowitz »

If you plan to use it for a dive knife, or just hang it on the wall and look at it, 420J2 might be okay. If you plan to cut more than one thing between sharpenings, stick to 1095.
I don't believe in safe queens, only in pre-need replacements.
dsvirsky
Member
Posts: 982
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: SW VA

#3

Post by dsvirsky »

yablanowitz wrote:If you plan to use it for a dive knife, or just hang it on the wall and look at it, 420J2 might be okay. If you plan to cut more than one thing between sharpenings, stick to 1095.
That pretty well covers it. Assuming you plan to actually use the knife, 420J2 is pretty much worthless unless corrosion is a significant issue. 1095, properly heat treated, is a good steel for a working knife.
jzmtl
Member
Posts: 1417
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:02 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

#4

Post by jzmtl »

There are more to worry about than edge holding in a $13 knock off. You don't even know if the blade has been properly heat treated, or handle has been properly constructed. The blade could shatter or tang could break and cause injury to the user.
Post Reply