
https://www.fox29.com/news/11-still-rec ... ing-attack
RustyIron wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 12:39 amAlthough it really doesn't make any difference, I'm glad it wasn't a Spyderco.
And just in case anyone isn't clear, the media are a bunch of dimwitted obfuscators of the truth. They tell use that the police took the man into custody and citizens helped apprehend the suspect.
If those fools were not trying to feed us their ulterior agenda, they would have told us that a regular citizen with a legally owned gun stopped the rampaging maniac until the police arrived to take him into custody. If the guy didn't have a gun to stop the mayhem, there's no telling how many more innocents would have been mutilated or killed. Lives have been forever changed, and it wasn't the police, the politicians, or the media who put a stop to it.
RustyIron wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 12:39 amAlthough it really doesn't make any difference, I'm glad it wasn't a Spyderco.
And just in case anyone isn't clear, the media are a bunch of dimwitted obfuscators of the truth. They tell use that the police took the man into custody and citizens helped apprehend the suspect.
If those fools were not trying to feed us their ulterior agenda, they would have told us that a regular citizen with a legally owned gun stopped the rampaging maniac until the police arrived to take him into custody. If the guy didn't have a gun to stop the mayhem, there's no telling how many more innocents would have been mutilated or killed. Lives have been forever changed, and it wasn't the police, the politicians, or the media who put a stop to it.
Ah.... So much for ulterior agendas.... It was more than just one guy who went after, stopped the attacker....RustyIron wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 12:39 amAlthough it really doesn't make any difference, I'm glad it wasn't a Spyderco.
And just in case anyone isn't clear, the media are a bunch of dimwitted obfuscators of the truth. They tell use that the police took the man into custody and citizens helped apprehend the suspect.
If those fools were not trying to feed us their ulterior agenda, they would have told us that a regular citizen with a legally owned gun stopped the rampaging maniac until the police arrived to take him into custody. If the guy didn't have a gun to stop the mayhem, there's no telling how many more innocents would have been mutilated or killed. Lives have been forever changed, and it wasn't the police, the politicians, or the media who put a stop to it.
Yeah, I notice that the article says that the man has several involuntary commitments on his record, as well as substance abuse issues. For those that don't know, that means he wouldn't be able to pass a federal background check to purchase a firearm.Ankerson wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 7:54 amAh.... So much for ulterior agendas.... It was more than just one guy who went after, stopped the attacker....RustyIron wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 12:39 amAlthough it really doesn't make any difference, I'm glad it wasn't a Spyderco.
And just in case anyone isn't clear, the media are a bunch of dimwitted obfuscators of the truth. They tell use that the police took the man into custody and citizens helped apprehend the suspect.
If those fools were not trying to feed us their ulterior agenda, they would have told us that a regular citizen with a legally owned gun stopped the rampaging maniac until the police arrived to take him into custody. If the guy didn't have a gun to stop the mayhem, there's no telling how many more innocents would have been mutilated or killed. Lives have been forever changed, and it wasn't the police, the politicians, or the media who put a stop to it.![]()
https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/27/us/traverse-city-walmart-stabbing-michigan-wwk-hnk
From the article above:
"Another bystander, who Kolakowski later learned is also a Marine, drew a gun on the attacker."
So lets see all here sofar are ignoring the fact that citizens came together to stop the attack, 2 Marines in the mix of them too. Semper Fi Marines....
Ignore all the above and focus only on the guy with a gun huh?
Ulterior agendas, dimwitted? Really?
The guy with the shopping cart did more damage to the attacker than anyone, actually knocked the attacker down etc.
Anyhow, the article I posted explained what really happened in detail and how it actually went down.
Scandi Grind wrote: ↑Sun Aug 03, 2025 6:08 pmI don't have issue with having laws against felons owning arms. I do have issue with laws saying that law abiding citizens are only allowed to have ten shots in a mag to defend themself and a litany of similar restrictions that criminals aren't inclined notice. I don't care what political leaning anybody wants to throw me among because I say that, but this isn't about politics for me, it is just the opinion I have. I'm OK with other people having other opinions. I don't need to justify my opinion to anyone, and nobody cares whether I have justification anyway, logical or not because it isn't their opinion. That's kinda how it works, we have different opinions because we think different things are right, so somebody else thinking otherwise doesn't really make a difference to anybody here.
We all have different experiences, different pardigms, and different beliefs that form our conclusions. I like hearing other peoples opinions, and I like sharing my perspective, but I am not here to convince anyone.
Wrong..Midnightrider wrote: ↑Mon Aug 04, 2025 2:57 amNo, rights existed before the goverment, and the only legitimate form of goverment is that which recognizes that fundamental truth, and is created to preserve those rights. This is what the Constitution says. This is what all the Signers said. See the Federalist Papers, etc.
Doc Dan wrote: ↑Mon Aug 04, 2025 8:30 amNo, the Government did not give those rights. As Americans we recognize those as unalienable rights. The Government is supposed to protect those rights and has no Constitutional authority to take them away. Those who try to do so are actually anti American and are attacking our nation from within.