Hey Everyone,
I’m new here and learning the perils of fakes on the secondary marketplace. I’m trying to be causations so I’m hoping someone can comment on the authenticity of this shaman z-wear micarta model. Thank you!
Shaman z-wear authentication
-
- Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2023 6:21 pm
-
- Member
- Posts: 3001
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
- Location: Longmont, CO USA
- Contact:
Re: Shaman z-wear authentication
Dear Rookandalbie:
Welcome to the Spyderco Forum.
Stay safe,
Mike
Welcome to the Spyderco Forum.
Stay safe,
Mike
-
- Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2023 6:21 pm
Re: Shaman z-wear authentication
Thank you. Somebody please tell me, but I feel like this seals the deal that it’s a fake
Never seen an SG symbol where the line doesn’t intersect the apex of the triangle…
Also this clip can’t be legit
Never seen an SG symbol where the line doesn’t intersect the apex of the triangle…
Also this clip can’t be legit
Re: Shaman z-wear authentication
Everything looks 100% correct, including the Sal symbol and the clip. Also, sprints and exclusives don't really get counterfeited.
-
- Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2023 6:21 pm
Re: Shaman z-wear authentication
That’s fantastic to know, and I really appreciate your reply. I found it from a private seller and as a semi/non- expert wasn’t sure about some things (like all parts of the G in Sal’s initials not fully connecting/ touching each other) but I’ve also seen that occasionally when I zoom in. Also I know there’s a clone cruwear micarta shaman that runs on bearings and not washers, and I actually recently saw a z-wear sprint run micarta shaman for sale that I swear had the same dark plasticy looking scales I’ve seen on the cruwear shaman micarta clone. I’m glad to know you think the one I posted looks legit.
Re: Shaman z-wear authentication
I've seen the fake 'S30V' micarta Shamans with bearings, but I didn't know they were marking any of them as Cruwear. The fake micarta Shamans are extremely easy to spot...basically every fine detail is wrong.