Deadboxhero wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 10:49 pmI updated the OP
With a rope cut test between S30v and SPY27
Excellent! Thanks much for conducting and publishing this test!
Deadboxhero wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 10:49 pmI updated the OP
With a rope cut test between S30v and SPY27
Thanks! Good test.Deadboxhero wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 10:49 pmI updated the OP
With a rope cut test between S30v and SPY27
That topic deserves it's own thread.
Thanks, that’s really good to hear!Deadboxhero wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 12:35 pmThat topic deserves it's own thread.
I've been using this piece of equipment for two years now, I've had multiple phone conversations with the creator of the BESS Tester to ensure I have been using best practices and that I'm using it to get the most repeatable results.
The work is greatly appreciated!sal wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 1:22 pmHi Cl1ff,
This has been a question for decades. First we built our own cutting test machine. ( early 90's). Then we bought and set up a CATRA again to try to answer this question. These days, we use the CATRA, Real World Testing, (RWT) and our forum participation to bring the truth closer.
sal
The white dots are Carbides, you can see the size and volume of them.
Deadboxhero wrote: ↑Sat Jan 16, 2021 1:19 am...There are also hidden features we can't see.
You can't see what type of carbides they are, you can't necessarily see the soft retained austenite, can't really see grain size (unless some prior Austenite grains are showing) and you can't see carbon and other elements that are in solution which are huge factors.
Those features are crucial and seem to be elusive to aspiring metal nerds and almost requires some heat treatment experience to fully appreciate.
All good questions, the rabbit hole goes deeper and deeper the more you learn.Bolster wrote: ↑Sat Jan 16, 2021 6:59 pmDeadboxhero wrote: ↑Sat Jan 16, 2021 1:19 am...There are also hidden features we can't see.
You can't see what type of carbides they are, you can't necessarily see the soft retained austenite, can't really see grain size (unless some prior Austenite grains are showing) and you can't see carbon and other elements that are in solution which are huge factors.
Those features are crucial and seem to be elusive to aspiring metal nerds and almost requires some heat treatment experience to fully appreciate.
Aha, excellent. Thank you, especially for the "and what you can't see" portion, which I'd not considered previously.
Do you have any opinion on the "clumpiness" of the carbides in the photo, or is that just a random distribution? There is really just the one clump; could be a fluke.
The fewer carbides in SPY27 cf S30V would correlate well with your test, would it not?
The relatively small carbides spaced well apart might indicate a tougher steel, but I think SPY27 is only around the 8-11 ft/lbs range for toughness, no? That puzzles me a bit.
Thanks Baron, I appreciate it :)Baron Mind wrote: ↑Sat Jan 16, 2021 10:55 pmJust wanted to thank and commend you for performing and sharing your cut test. The depth, detail, and precision of your testing is impressive.
Deadboxhero wrote: All good questions, the rabbit hole goes deeper and deeper the more you learn. Everytime just looking for simple answers but just seem to end up with more questions.
Deadboxhero wrote: I'm curious to see how the edge stability compares to a steel like S30v, I feel I have a test design that can reduce a lot of variables.
Larrin wrote: ↑Sun Jan 17, 2021 1:20 pmSPY27 and CPM-154 have roughly the same toughness. I did a whole range of CPM-154 toughness experiments and none of them matched that original value so I threw it out. I don't know what happened with it. https://knifesteelnerds.com/2020/03/16/ ... periments/
Military/M2 in Spy27 and Mineral Blue G10 for the win.elena86 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:13 pmCycletroll wrote: ↑Sun Jun 14, 2020 5:59 pmThanks Shawn! Good to hear!
I'll be waiting (praying) for a Military.
THAT would be a dream spydie for me :spyder: Cobalt blue G10 handle of course :eek: