Like you said, it's a hard subject to juggle with. Sometimes designer pieces that doesn't sold hot cement your legacy as a company. The Slysz Bowie didn't bring the world on fire the first time, but now it's one of the most famous folder from recent memory, putting the Spyderco name on many mouths.sal wrote: ↑Mon Nov 15, 2021 12:27 amI really appreciate all of the comments and I appreciate the OP for re-posting it here.
Spyderco has evolved over a 40+ year period. As we evolved, we found that our market was changing and growing in a variety of areas. We have to balance some pretty diverse groups and that balance is always changing. Especially as new markets emerge. Suddenly we have a collector market. Suddenly we have a variety of collector markets. Suddenly we have Steel Junky's, Exclusives, Sprints, add capacity issues with most of our factories and partners.
We also have to plan for the future; how do we serve these markets? How do we deal with the higher costs without running to China? How many "new" models do we want to gamble with? Knowing that some will not last and we might not even recoup our tooling? rankly, it is a "puzzlement" that we are always juggling. That's why I wanted and appreciate a larger group of responses.
Most of the innovations are born in-house. Models like the Shaman took years to develop, and the two other variations are still waiting for a production slot. Shamans, "Roadies", Slipits take time to get them right enough to put into production. Even now, we have a number of new innovations that have been in development for years.
Threads like this one give us good input to think of while going forward.
sal
The collaboration with Martin Slysz was a very good call (Spyderco rat, when ? =D). I think Spyderco should keep on finding those kind of talents. Elijah Isham designed the wonderful Civivi Mckenna. I'm sure a collaboration with him would be something amazing.
I've tried to design a PM2 with a Nirvana blade and if you ever want to make it happen, you have my mail address.