BD1N toughness

Discuss Spyderco's products and history.
User avatar
Matus
Member
Posts: 1736
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 10:48 pm
Location: Germany

Re: BD1N toughness

#41

Post by Matus »

amen to that
... I like weird :bug-red :bug-white-red :bug-white ...
User avatar
Ramonade
Member
Posts: 3104
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2021 3:45 pm
Location: NE France

Re: BD1N toughness

#42

Post by Ramonade »

Yet another reason to add as why I heavily use "for me" and "I like" when i discuss steels :squinting-tongue
:respect In the collection :respect : Lots of different steels, in lots of different (and same) Spydercos.

Robin. Finally made an IG : ramo_knives

MNOSD member 004* aka Mr. N5s :face-clouds
chronovore
Member
Posts: 206
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2021 10:07 pm

Re: BD1N toughness

#43

Post by chronovore »

Larrin wrote:
Tue Nov 16, 2021 4:15 am
There has never been a consensus among the “industry performance” of steel in knives. Look at five different knife steel rating charts and you will get five different answers. It always surprises me when someone argues against a test result of mine and says that “everyone knows” such and such steel cuts longer, is tougher, etc than another. People have their bubbles where people agree on certain things but there are other bubbles where they think something else. I’ve been around for much longer than Knife Steel Nerds and historically ideas about steel performance were impossible to piece together into a coherent picture. I know, I tried for years. People just cherry-pick the results from what they like. This forum guy, or that YouTuber, or this redditor in this comparison said this steel is better than that one and I like that result and I am either ignoring the others or I am ignorant of them. And where there has been consensus has been as dangerous as where there hasn’t. For example, steels perceived as high end are given high marks for toughness even if it is the wear resistance that is good and the toughness isn’t.
Larrin, you are amazing and I am grateful for your many contributions, from the corrosion resistance table I recently quoted on Blade Forums to the custom fixed blade in MagnaCut sitting on the desk next to my computer as I type this.

My argument against your particular results here is that they reflect your heat treatments for these steels as opposed to the actual heat treatments that these steels will get in the production knives in which most people will actually be encountering them.

A crucial question for any scientific study is what exactly is being modeled. Just thinking about Spyderco knives, your edge retention ratings for BD1N, VG-10, and S30V are 3.5, 4.5, and 6 respectively. Is that consistent with the actual edge retention of these steels in the Spyderco knives that use them?
User avatar
Ramonade
Member
Posts: 3104
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2021 3:45 pm
Location: NE France

Re: BD1N toughness

#44

Post by Ramonade »

@chronovore : If one is actually trying to test the steels, one has to do the optimal heat treats otherwise the potential of each steel is not shown. As Dr.Larrin said earlier (and numerous times), people were claiming properties of this or that steel for years without anything backing it up. Now we know what toughness, wear resistance, corrosion resistance, etc each steel can truely achieve and how it compares to others.

It's impossible to create these data points around the heat treats of 1 brand without having the exact initial problem about claims that are impossible to verify
:respect In the collection :respect : Lots of different steels, in lots of different (and same) Spydercos.

Robin. Finally made an IG : ramo_knives

MNOSD member 004* aka Mr. N5s :face-clouds
User avatar
Larrin
Member
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 9:27 am
Contact:

Re: BD1N toughness

#45

Post by Larrin »

chronovore wrote:
Wed Nov 17, 2021 3:03 am

A crucial question for any scientific study is what exactly is being modeled. Just thinking about Spyderco knives, your edge retention ratings for BD1N, VG-10, and S30V are 3.5, 4.5, and 6 respectively. Is that consistent with the actual edge retention of these steels in the Spyderco knives that use them?
Yes. I have analyzed the full CATRA datasets of two major knife manufacturers. You can read about one of them here: https://knifesteelnerds.com/2018/11/19/ ... retention/

There were no major surprises when I did my own testing instead even though I was heat treating them instead of the knife company. The relative differences are the same.
http://www.KnifeSteelNerds.com - Steel Metallurgy topics related to knives
Baron Mind
Member
Posts: 475
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2018 4:18 pm

Re: BD1N toughness

#46

Post by Baron Mind »

Deadboxhero wrote:
Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:26 pm
Larrin wrote:
Mon Nov 15, 2021 1:10 pm
BD1N was 8.3 ft-lbs at 59.2 Rc.
Several days worth of work, just for one sentence.

I don't think folks understand how much work goes into this.
We're just going to ignore this comment? I am not a member of this class of high level, huge dedication, forgers and physicists of the knife community, but as one who appreciates science, and an obsessive pursuit of one's passion, I can appreciate what you mean. The "pfft, idc what the test says, I skinned 3 squirrels with my knife and she was still sca-reaming sharp" crowd bothers me.
Last edited by Baron Mind on Wed Nov 17, 2021 11:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Baron Mind
Member
Posts: 475
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2018 4:18 pm

Re: BD1N toughness

#47

Post by Baron Mind »

Double post
Big_Tex
Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2021 3:34 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: BD1N toughness

#48

Post by Big_Tex »

Informative video on performance of BD1N… obviously not related to it’s toughness per se, but worth watching

Bryan
Atlanta, GA
IG @BryanCBailey

Current pocket rotation:
Z-Wear/Micarta Shaman
Magnacut Native 5 LW
k390 Endela

:bug-red : 73 Spydies in the collection
Post Reply