bearfacedkiller wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 7:33 amWell, it is a free market and we all get to decide what is a good value and what isn’t. Just keep voting with your wallet and let the market sort the rest out.
Does't make sense to talk about Spyderco as if they are an "American Made" company when the overwhelming majority of their production occurs outside the US, with a substantial portion of that from China.Haunted House wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 4:54 pmCompared to what? Cheap Chinese knives?
I consider Spyderco pricing extremely fair & reasonable.
We've also seen from testing, that Spyderco is quite often doing a better job with their heat treatments, than many other companies.SubMicron wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 6:34 pmAs someone who buys several knives per month and who owns multiple knives of brands like Benchmade, Kershaw, Civivi, and CRKT I can say that as a whole, Spyderco's pricing is not out of line based on what else is out there.
There is a big difference between a $80 Kershaw in M390 and a $150 Spyderco in M390. While they are both pocket knives, there's a whole lot more to it with a Spyderco. Generally speaking, you're getting more for your money with a Spyderco. The design is more intelligent, the ergonomics are more natural, and the operation is smoother, while being safer.
In no other knife company can you find as wide of a selection of steels, proven locking mechanisms, and different designs as you can with Spyderco.
Those are all subjective things and not facts. Ergonomics differ for everyone. Would you pay twice as much for everything in life even if it does feel slightly better in the hand? I don't think many people would. That's a very hard sell. Someone could easily say Kershaw has better ergos and a more "intelligent design" and who's to say they're wrong? Just playing some devil's advocate here...SubMicron wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 6:34 pmThere is a big difference between a $80 Kershaw in M390 and a $150 Spyderco in M390. While they are both pocket knives, there's a whole lot more to it with a Spyderco. Generally speaking, you're getting more for your money with a Spyderco. The design is more intelligent, the ergonomics are more natural, and the operation is smoother, while being safer.
i just bought a composite dividend for $80. never thought i’d buy another kershaw, let alone spend that much on one. i couldn’t pass it up though because it’s cool. anyway, once i got it i realized its way smaller than my favorite spydercos (manix and yojimbo), but has more blade. i would call it a very nice design. not quite as ergonomic, but far more efficient, and still plenty comfortable to hold and use. it depends on what people prioritize.BornIn1500 wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 7:20 pmThose are all subjective things and not facts. Ergonomics differ for everyone. Would you pay twice as much for everything in life even if it does feel slightly better in the hand? I don't think many people would. That's a very hard sell. Someone could easily say Kershaw has better ergos and a more "intelligent design" and who's to say they're wrong? Just playing some devil's advocate here...SubMicron wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 6:34 pmThere is a big difference between a $80 Kershaw in M390 and a $150 Spyderco in M390. While they are both pocket knives, there's a whole lot more to it with a Spyderco. Generally speaking, you're getting more for your money with a Spyderco. The design is more intelligent, the ergonomics are more natural, and the operation is smoother, while being safer.
Return to “Spyderco General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Bristlecone pine, Craiger12, Featherblade, Holland, jacala, jensh, JMM, Rp5 and 35 guests