Is This a Trademark Violation?

A place to list and reference all Spyderco counterfeits, clones, and replicas that are found. Anything that isn't a legitimate Spyderco fits in this area.
User avatar
The Deacon
Member
Posts: 25717
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Upstate SC, USA
Contact:

Is This a Trademark Violation?

#1

Post by The Deacon »

Knife doesn't look anything like a Spyderco, hole isn't round, but is the Dragonfly name a Spyderco trademark?

http://www.artisancutlery.net/index.php ... uct_id=174
Paul
My Personal Website ---- Beginners Guide to Spyderco Collecting ---- Spydiewiki
Deplorable :p
WTC # 1458 - 1504 - 1508 - Never Forget, Never Forgive!
User avatar
Doc Dan
Member
Posts: 14731
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:25 am
Location: In a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity.

Re: Is This a Trademark Violation?

#2

Post by Doc Dan »

Certainly, no one would ever mistake that for a Spyderco, and given that the name Dragonfly has been used many times, I doubt the infringement.
I Pray Heaven to Bestow The Best of Blessing on THIS HOUSE, and on ALL that shall hereafter Inhabit it. May none but Honest and Wise Men ever rule under This Roof! (John Adams regarding the White House)

Follow the Christ, the King,
Live pure, speak true, right wrong, follow the King--
Else, wherefore born?" (Tennyson)



NRA Life Member
Spydernation 0050
User avatar
wrdwrght
Member
Posts: 5067
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:35 am

Re: Is This a Trademark Violation?

#3

Post by wrdwrght »

I don’t think so. Absent an attempt at physical likeness, generic words that Spyderco happens to use are not restricted. Fair use.

Of course, heavyweight corporations have been known to buy unfair judgments.
-Marc (pocketing a Maxamet Sage5 today)

“When science changes its opinion, it didn’t lie to you. It learned more.”
User avatar
The Deacon
Member
Posts: 25717
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Upstate SC, USA
Contact:

Re: Is This a Trademark Violation?

#4

Post by The Deacon »

Doc Dan wrote:
Sat May 18, 2019 3:54 am
Certainly, no one would ever mistake that for a Spyderco, and given that the name Dragonfly has been used many times, I doubt the infringement.
wrdwrght wrote: I don’t think so. Absent an attempt at physical likeness, generic words that Spyderco happens to use are not restricted. Fair use.

Of course, heavyweight corporations have been known to buy unfair judgments.

You may both be right.

Still, the reason I asked is because I recall reading that Spyderco was forced to stop using the name "Pro Hunter" for the knife that first became the Pro Venator and later the ProGrip because another knife company had a trademark on Pro Hunter as the name of a knife. Granted "Dragonfly" is a common word, but common words can be trademarked in a specific context.
Paul
My Personal Website ---- Beginners Guide to Spyderco Collecting ---- Spydiewiki
Deplorable :p
WTC # 1458 - 1504 - 1508 - Never Forget, Never Forgive!
N. Brian Huegel
Member
Posts: 278
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Country Knives - Intercourse, PA USA
Contact:

Re: Is This a Trademark Violation?

#5

Post by N. Brian Huegel »

On page 44 of the 2019 Spyderco Product Guide, the name Dragonfly has a ™ trademark symbol after it so one assumes that Artisan Cutlery use is a trademark violation.
User avatar
Doc Dan
Member
Posts: 14731
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:25 am
Location: In a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity.

Re: Is This a Trademark Violation?

#6

Post by Doc Dan »

It is hard to put a restriction on the use of a name like that. I have to stop and think on it for a bit, but Spyderco and Schrade also have knives of the same name. However, when you get to a name like Endelica, or something, that is unique and could not be used by someone else since it is not a common name.
I Pray Heaven to Bestow The Best of Blessing on THIS HOUSE, and on ALL that shall hereafter Inhabit it. May none but Honest and Wise Men ever rule under This Roof! (John Adams regarding the White House)

Follow the Christ, the King,
Live pure, speak true, right wrong, follow the King--
Else, wherefore born?" (Tennyson)



NRA Life Member
Spydernation 0050
brainfriction
Member
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 7:55 pm
Location: Wisconsin, USA, Earth.

Re: Is This a Trademark Violation?

#7

Post by brainfriction »

N. Brian Huegel wrote:
Sat May 18, 2019 11:11 am
On page 44 of the 2019 Spyderco Product Guide, the name Dragonfly has a ™ trademark symbol after it so one assumes that Artisan Cutlery use is a trademark violation.
Yeah but there's a lot of nuance to trademark law. I don't think it was Artisan's intent to confuse anyone, and it's pretty doubtful people are getting the two knives confused with eachother. If Spyderco tried to sue them I'm pretty sure they'd lose.
User avatar
Rpp
Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:58 am

Re: Is This a Trademark Violation?

#8

Post by Rpp »

No. Spyderco doesn’t have a trademark on Dragonfly with the uspto.

They do own “Counter Puppy” though.
Post Reply