ugaarguy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 6:14 am
Vivi wrote: ↑Thu Jan 03, 2019 12:56 pm
Many of Spydercos customers don't see it as an improvement. A vocal instagram minority does not constitute a majority.
Are you privy to Spyderco's internal marketing research or or other scientifically valid research which backs up those assertions? Anecdotally, this subject comes up frequently, which would indicate that a significant portion of users do want deep carry clips. Anecdotally, so many users want deep carry clips that the demand sustains at least two businesses (MXG & Lynch Northwest) with enough demand for multiple styles of deep carry clips. Anecdotally, Spyderco users are modifying other companies' steel deep carry clips to fit their Spyderco knives when they want a more economical alternative to the titanium clips from MXG & Lynch. Anecdotally, most of Spyderco's competition offers deep carry clips as standard - even traditional old Buck is sending out as standard a deep carry clip on their new slim versions of their traditionalist icon, the model 110. That's a rather large amount of circumstantial evidence in favor of deep carry clips. I don't think my desire for them puts me in a minority. But you can stay here in the Cult of Sal's Personality and keep telling me I don't need a deep carry clip and I'm just following a social media fad for wanting one.
Geez, you're getting a fair bit defensive.
I didn't tell anyone not to buy one, or that they don't need one, or call it a fad.
I've made two factual observations in this thread:
1. Spyderco has continually innovated their clip offerings over the years.
2. Not all of Spydercos customers want deep carry clips.
Both of these should be uncontroversial, because they are simple and true observations of the way things are.
If you search around you'll find confirmation from Sal that the majority of folks are happy with regular clips. So, yes, I am privy to data which backs up these observations.