sal wrote: ↑Sun Mar 11, 2018 9:17 pm
I'm guessing that
eating one of our blades could be hazardous to health. We will, however, comply with the demand.
sal
Don't give the regulators any ideas. You want that engraved on every blade you sell?
Teh List was spawned with good intentions, but had many foreseeable if unintended consequences.
Keeping tabs on the list can bring a chuckle, both for what is included as well as NOT included (don't go into the NOT list discussion--avoid expansion).
The two categories of harm are cancer and reproductive health/birth defects.
Thus many prescription meds and OTC meds are included, including some which evidence based medicine clearly demonstrate reduction in cancer risk, yet are PROscribed e.g. during pregnancy. (some have risk to males re: reproductive health, as well as non-pregnant females.)
Some meds on the list are used primarily to TREAT cancer, yet are listed because they may cause cancer >irony<
Some items on the list are normally produced in the body by metabolic pathways. Many listed are hormones produced in the body. (and available exogenously)
How about one which is an *essential* substance ( we must have it to maintain reproductive health, and we get it from exogenous sources). At least they include the excessive intake restriction in the database...
Yes, there was lawsuit abuse, similar to what happened in CA with ADA lawsuit abuse. A few lawyers in particular would send letters of demand of settlement for failure to properly post warnings. Typically $4,000 to $5,000 per "offense," sent to hundreds of business. Shakedowns work(ed), monies paid, Prop 65 warnings rectified. So it goes. (KV)
Picture an outdoor clothing manufacturer with high-tech treatments to the fabric, who ships a few thousand articles without the proper CA-65 warnings on each item. The state fines apply to *each item,* and can you guess potentially how many thousands of dollars per? Yikes. That's when you need to hire a shark for your side. Shark v shark.
(what's the best thing that can happen to the only lawyer in a small town? Have another attorney move there, so they can sue each other ad libitum.)
a priori request for leniency from my lawyer relatives, and the District Judge (ret.)
Shakespeare was wise. Some things never change.
kind regards,
a n.on