Why linerless?
Why linerless?
Many of you seem to prefer linerless designs. Why?
I for my part like the looks of a handle sheet on top of a visible liner. It just looks right when the blade is parked between steel liners.
I for my part like the looks of a handle sheet on top of a visible liner. It just looks right when the blade is parked between steel liners.
Michael
48 Spydies, 44 different models, 43 different steels
.
Grail knife, still to be acquired: original Tuff by Ed Schempp Feel free to help me find one at a reasonable price...
48 Spydies, 44 different models, 43 different steels
.
Grail knife, still to be acquired: original Tuff by Ed Schempp Feel free to help me find one at a reasonable price...
- xceptnl
- Member
- Posts: 8594
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:48 pm
- Location: Tobacco Country, Virginia
- Contact:
Re: Why linerless?
For me personally it harkens back to the linerless micarta days of Spydies past like the original JD Smith and Caly Jr. I hope this is a trend of things to come. If so I am extremely pleased.archangel wrote:Many of you seem to prefer linerless designs. Why?
I for my part like the looks of a handle sheet on top of a visible liner. It just looks right when the blade is parked between steel liners.
*Landon*sal wrote: .... even today, we design a knife from the edge out!
Re: Why linerless?
But why do you think it‘s better? Just your personal preference, designwise? Or is there any major advantage I am missing? I get that linerless designs may have a lower weight. But I can‘t see that this must be considered as advantage.
Michael
48 Spydies, 44 different models, 43 different steels
.
Grail knife, still to be acquired: original Tuff by Ed Schempp Feel free to help me find one at a reasonable price...
48 Spydies, 44 different models, 43 different steels
.
Grail knife, still to be acquired: original Tuff by Ed Schempp Feel free to help me find one at a reasonable price...
- xceptnl
- Member
- Posts: 8594
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:48 pm
- Location: Tobacco Country, Virginia
- Contact:
Re: Why linerless?
I feel it is a more aesthetically pleasing alternative to the FRN knives and provides adequate enough rigidity without the need for additional weight. Plus (in theory) it could impact the manufacturing costs to be without a liner and thus help the MSRP.archangel wrote:But why do you think it‘s better? Just your personal preference, designwise? Or is there any major advantage I am missing? I get that linerless designs may have a lower weight. But I can‘t see that this must be considered as advantage.
*Landon*sal wrote: .... even today, we design a knife from the edge out!
Re: Why linerless?
Because I can alter the shape of the handle to fit my hand without worrying about hitting liners and I can make the knife look factory made. I like the simplicity of it.
All SE all the time since 2017
~David
~David
-
- Member
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:51 am
Re: Why linerless?
Weight, not for me personally, but there is A LOT of discussion around weight.
Beyond that I think you are stepping into "why anything" country, why does anyone like anything. Why do you like them WITH liners?
Other possibilities include maintenance, depending on the usage, even though the blade and liners are typically different metal with liners being (most likely) more stain resistant. If there are no metal liners, there is no need to worry as much about wiping/cleaning the liners inside the knife.
COST, if linerless is cheaper (which on the lightweight models it typically is), then the money can go into the blade steel. Lightweight knives are nice options to try different blade steels, because they simply aren't as expensive as their non-linerless counterparts. A great example is S110V UKPK, at less than $100.
Beyond that I think you are stepping into "why anything" country, why does anyone like anything. Why do you like them WITH liners?
Other possibilities include maintenance, depending on the usage, even though the blade and liners are typically different metal with liners being (most likely) more stain resistant. If there are no metal liners, there is no need to worry as much about wiping/cleaning the liners inside the knife.
COST, if linerless is cheaper (which on the lightweight models it typically is), then the money can go into the blade steel. Lightweight knives are nice options to try different blade steels, because they simply aren't as expensive as their non-linerless counterparts. A great example is S110V UKPK, at less than $100.
Re: Why linerless?
Weight and size reduction and better balance. Lighter and thinner carries better. More neutral balance can improve feel when in use.
Re: Why linerless?
Not only are linerless designs lighter, they have one less part where dirt and grime can hide inside or behind, and for those of us living in places or doing things where rust could be a concern, it's one less metal part that can rust.
Don't get me wrong, I have a lot of Spydercos with liners or skeletonized liners that I love and do not want to see changed in the least bit. But I also really want to see more linerless Spydercos that embrace their lightness and simplicity.
Don't get me wrong, I have a lot of Spydercos with liners or skeletonized liners that I love and do not want to see changed in the least bit. But I also really want to see more linerless Spydercos that embrace their lightness and simplicity.
Re: Why linerless?
Can the cost be so much more when you have liners? Like you said, they’re probably not made of the same premium steel as the blade. But ok, it‘s still steel, and steel costs money, and needs certain care. You do have a good point there.
As to linerless designs being slimmer: I think a very good example of a very slim knife with liners is the P4. So in my opinion it‘s not a winning argument.
Weight: Yes, liner designs probably weigh more. I like some weight in my hand. But that‘s just personal preference. Like I said, I prefer the looks of steel being parked in between steel.
Guess I will just continue to enjoy liner designs where I can, and leave you enjoy lightweight simple linerless designs, too. :)
As to linerless designs being slimmer: I think a very good example of a very slim knife with liners is the P4. So in my opinion it‘s not a winning argument.
Weight: Yes, liner designs probably weigh more. I like some weight in my hand. But that‘s just personal preference. Like I said, I prefer the looks of steel being parked in between steel.
Guess I will just continue to enjoy liner designs where I can, and leave you enjoy lightweight simple linerless designs, too. :)
Michael
48 Spydies, 44 different models, 43 different steels
.
Grail knife, still to be acquired: original Tuff by Ed Schempp Feel free to help me find one at a reasonable price...
48 Spydies, 44 different models, 43 different steels
.
Grail knife, still to be acquired: original Tuff by Ed Schempp Feel free to help me find one at a reasonable price...
- thewoodpecker
- Member
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 1:58 pm
Re: Why linerless?
^^^ +1 ^^^ Took the words right out of my mouth. :spyder:xceptnl wrote:I feel it is a more aesthetically pleasing alternative to the FRN knives and provides adequate enough rigidity without the need for additional weight. Plus (in theory) it could impact the manufacturing costs to be without a liner and thus help the MSRP.archangel wrote:But why do you think it‘s better? Just your personal preference, designwise? Or is there any major advantage I am missing? I get that linerless designs may have a lower weight. But I can‘t see that this must be considered as advantage.
Spyderco Caly 3.5 Super Blue user, Astute enthusiast, and geometry advocate.
Re: Why linerless?
carrot wrote:Not only are linerless designs lighter, they have one less part where dirt and grime can hide inside or behind, and for those of us living in places or doing things where rust could be a concern, it's one less metal part that can rust.
Don't get me wrong, I have a lot of Spydercos with liners or skeletonized liners that I love and do not want to see changed in the least bit. But I also really want to see more linerless Spydercos that embrace their lightness and simplicity.
These guy's really nailed it, I also think Cold Steel probably helped people to understand that liner less G10 handles gives nothing away in strength, combined with the above benefits.ABX2011 wrote:Weight and size reduction and better balance. Lighter and thinner carries better. More neutral balance can improve feel when in use.
Re: Why linerless?
archangel wrote:Can the cost be so much more when you have liners? Like you said, they’re probably not made of the same premium steel as the blade. But ok, it‘s still steel, and steel costs money, and needs certain care. You do have a good point there.
As to linerless designs being slimmer: I think a very good example of a very slim knife with liners is the P4. So in my opinion it‘s not a winning argument.
Weight: Yes, liner designs probably weigh more. I like some weight in my hand. But that‘s just personal preference. Like I said, I prefer the looks of steel being parked in between steel.
Guess I will just continue to enjoy liner designs where I can, and leave you enjoy lightweight simple linerless designs, too. :)
Liners are an additional material with additional machining cost, which are typically nested into the scale which is another machining process. All that has to add to overall cost regardless of how inexpensive the liner material is.
All SE all the time since 2017
~David
~David
- thewoodpecker
- Member
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 1:58 pm
Re: Why linerless?
In addition to the thoughtful responses above: The lack of steel liners removes a component that has the potential for corrosion in adverse conditions. I think that FRN is great but my understanding is that the costs for setting up the molds for a new model is expensive. Milling G10 is a more cost effective method for producing a lightweight folding knife with little (if any) loss in performance and a significant savings in cost.
Spyderco Caly 3.5 Super Blue user, Astute enthusiast, and geometry advocate.
Re: Why linerless?
.....
Last edited by El Gato on Sat Oct 21, 2017 1:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Why linerless?
All the above.I don't think liners, nested or not, add so much rigidity or strenght specialy if we talk G10.It's more perception than anything else.
Marius
" A mind all logic is like a knife all blade. It makes the hand bleed that uses it "
( Rabindranath Tagore )
Proud member of the old school spyderedge nation![spyderco bug 3 :bug-white-red](./images/smilies/bug-white-red.png)
" A mind all logic is like a knife all blade. It makes the hand bleed that uses it "
( Rabindranath Tagore )
Proud member of the old school spyderedge nation
![spyderco bug 3 :bug-white-red](./images/smilies/bug-white-red.png)
- thewoodpecker
- Member
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 1:58 pm
Re: Why linerless?
I think it is unlikely that Spyderco will be discontinuing stalwart, steel liner models from their lineup.El Gato wrote:There seems to be a lot of very good discussion in the various threads concerning FRCP, FRN, Light Weight, and Linerless knife models lately. It is almost like everyone wants lighter weight, simpler construction and lower selling price, and I am seeing more and more new Light Weight versions of so many Signature Series knives these days. It almost looks like a trend developing and a sign of things to come. If this is what most folks want then I am happy to see more options for those who want them.
But it also makes me wonder about the future of the more robust models with full liners or skeletonized liners, that I personally prefer for the heft and feel of them in hand and stability of the tool in use. Am I beginning to see the last of some of these personal favorites?
Of course there is always a bright side to most everything, and if the future trend is going to be for the Light Weight et. al. versions, then I am going to be keeping a lot more money in my pocket.
I guess I had better grab a couple of the Manix 2 CPM M-4 Blade HQ Exclusives before the ss linered knives become the next on the disco'ed list.
Dave
Spyderco Caly 3.5 Super Blue user, Astute enthusiast, and geometry advocate.
Re: Why linerless?
This may just be me, but one reason I like linerless or nested liner designs is that I'm married and left handed. I don't like the metal to metal contact between my ring and the liners.
...I guess I could just stop wearing my wedding band, but I don't know how the wife'd feel about it lol. :D :o
Also generally agree with the other "pros" pointed out already.
...I guess I could just stop wearing my wedding band, but I don't know how the wife'd feel about it lol. :D :o
Also generally agree with the other "pros" pointed out already.
:spyder:
Re: Why linerless?
How so? Many of us prefer light to heavy. For example when I jog up and down a mountain near where I live I only ever carry unlined knives like a Pacific Salt.archangel wrote:But why do you think it‘s better? Just your personal preference, designwise? Or is there any major advantage I am missing? I get that linerless designs may have a lower weight. But I can‘t see that this must be considered as advantage.
The way I see it, the lighter your knives are, the more of them you can comfortably carry at once
![wink ;)](./images/smilies/winking-face.png)
![unicorn :unicorn](./images/smilies/unicorn.png)
Re: Why linerless?
Simplicity, ease of maintenance, lighter, just as strong (for reasonable applications), less worry about rust.
- Surfingringo
- Member
- Posts: 5824
- Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 2:02 pm
- Location: Costa Rica
Re: Why linerless?
Ease of maintenance in corrosive environments. No liners to rust.
*I like knives with liners but I’m glad Spyderco is giving us a number of linerless options too.
*I like knives with liners but I’m glad Spyderco is giving us a number of linerless options too.