Chinook Confusion

Discuss Spyderco's products and history.
mikey177
Member
Posts: 2181
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 12:33 am
Location: Philippines

Re: Chinook Confusion

#41

Post by mikey177 »

Manixguy@1994 wrote:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 7:34 pm
mikey177 wrote:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 6:47 pm
You're welcome, Bolster.

I recently got a Chinook 1 with the pinned construction, and it is definitely the beefiest Spyderco I have so far encountered. Of course, I've never seen or held a K2 or Tighe Stick.

Plus, the Chinook 1 comes in a steel that has 425 more V's than the hot new whizbang steel :grin-sweat chinook_02.jpg
Ha ha ! The think what I like the most of the original opposed to my Chinook 2 is the lack of an exaggerated hump above the Spydie hole . The blade looks so much cleaner . Your picture is beautiful too . Dan

Thanks, Dan! The Chinook 1 indeed has a lot of metal in front of the Spydiehole, so I can see how the designer could liken it to a pickup truck.
User avatar
Cl1ff
Member
Posts: 1129
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2019 4:35 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Chinook Confusion

#42

Post by Cl1ff »

wrdwrght wrote:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 4:02 pm
Thanks to this thread, I now have a C4, my first Chinook, coming to me, appropriately enough, from the Great White North’s Warriors & Wonders. FYI, now OOS…

Really stoked.

And I get a PowerLock to stand in for one I lost when I sold my Tatanka (I like big, just not that big).
I’m not exactly asking you to disassemble your knife, but the comparison of the Powerlocks between the Chinook 4 and Tatanka is one reason I want to see inside the Chinooks.

I was studying the lock and sketching some rough design. I noticed that my design with no choil was not working with the Tatanka’s Powerlock set up, the knife with those really nice pictures showing a piece with clear scales so you can see the lock.

The Chinook 4 has the interesting distinction of being a Powerlock with no choil (something I’ve always liked about the design), as well having “evolved” from a previous iterations that did have choils.

However, I couldn’t find any images of the internals of that knife, or any Chinook.

From what I can tell, the C4 eliminates the stop pin that takes up a lot of space and makes the choil necessary on the Tatanka. I have some ideas, however, I’m not really sure what’s going on and the easiest way to figure it out would be to just have a look at the inside of the knife.

I would buy one myself just to figure this out (and because I’ve always been attracted to the design) but that will have to wait. By then, it’d maybe be better to just wait and see what Sal has planned for the next version.

Or maybe a Sage with a Powerlock? Probably both. My recent interest in lock design has the Sage series looking more and more interesting, to me.

I think there’s also some potential for innovation in the way of lock manipulation for backlock style mechanisms like the Powerlock, at least in production/Spyderco knives, but that’s another topic.

Sorry for the long-winded comment.
rex121 is the king of steel, but nature’s teeth have been cutting for hundreds of millions of years and counting :cool:
User avatar
Enactive
Member
Posts: 2043
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 8:19 pm
Location: Wet side of Washington

Re: Chinook Confusion

#43

Post by Enactive »

As I understand from Sal, the power lock is proprietary to the G. Sakai shop.

I was tempted many times to buy a C4, because of the lock. The overall design of the C4 wouldn't make it particularly useful in my applications, so I never did buy one.
User avatar
wrdwrght
Member
Posts: 5083
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:35 am

Re: Chinook Confusion

#44

Post by wrdwrght »

Cl1ff wrote:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 9:41 pm
wrdwrght wrote:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 4:02 pm
Thanks to this thread, I now have a C4, my first Chinook, coming to me, appropriately enough, from the Great White North’s Warriors & Wonders. FYI, now OOS…

Really stoked.

And I get a PowerLock to stand in for one I lost when I sold my Tatanka (I like big, just not that big).
I’m not exactly asking you to disassemble your knife, but the comparison of the Powerlocks between the Chinook 4 and Tatanka is one reason I want to see inside the Chinooks.
Just to be clear, I no longer have a Tatanka.
-Marc (pocketing an S110V Native5 today)

“When science changes its opinion, it didn’t lie to you. It learned more.”
User avatar
Cl1ff
Member
Posts: 1129
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2019 4:35 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Chinook Confusion

#45

Post by Cl1ff »

wrdwrght wrote:
Sun Feb 05, 2023 2:44 pm
Cl1ff wrote:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 9:41 pm
wrdwrght wrote:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 4:02 pm
Thanks to this thread, I now have a C4, my first Chinook, coming to me, appropriately enough, from the Great White North’s Warriors & Wonders. FYI, now OOS…

Really stoked.

And I get a PowerLock to stand in for one I lost when I sold my Tatanka (I like big, just not that big).
I’m not exactly asking you to disassemble your knife, but the comparison of the Powerlocks between the Chinook 4 and Tatanka is one reason I want to see inside the Chinooks.
Just to be clear, I no longer have a Tatanka.
Yeah, sorry. I was just rambling. There are already excellent references for the Tatanka. I'm interested in seeing the Chinooks disassembled, to clarify. I'm not really asking anyone to take apart their knife, unless they want to. My reply should probably have been a separate comment. When you mentioned the C4's powerlock standing in for the Tantanka, I thought about the differences I've noticed between them.
rex121 is the king of steel, but nature’s teeth have been cutting for hundreds of millions of years and counting :cool:
User avatar
Josh Crutchley
Member
Posts: 1395
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 2:44 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Chinook Confusion

#46

Post by Josh Crutchley »

Didn't even know the Chinook 4 had a power lock, thought it was only on the Tatanka. Learn something new everyday.
User avatar
Naperville
Member
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 2:58 am
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: Chinook Confusion

#47

Post by Naperville »

sal wrote:
Wed Feb 01, 2023 10:56 pm
We're working on a new Chinook.

sal
Can't wait to see it!

If it is anything like the photos that I've seen of previous models I like it already.
I support the 2nd Amendment Organizations of GOA, NRA, FPC, SAF, and "Knife Rights"
T2T: https://tunnel2towers.org; Special Operations Wounded Warriors: https://sowwcharity.com/
User avatar
Enactive
Member
Posts: 2043
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 8:19 pm
Location: Wet side of Washington

Re: Chinook Confusion

#48

Post by Enactive »

It will be interesting to see if the C5 uses the power lock.
mikey177
Member
Posts: 2181
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 12:33 am
Location: Philippines

Re: Chinook Confusion

#49

Post by mikey177 »

Enactive wrote:
Sun Feb 05, 2023 9:16 pm
It will be interesting to see if the C5 uses the power lock.

In last year's Chinook 5 thread, Sa was leaning toward the compression lock, but I don't know if that has changed.

sal wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 7:19 pm
So I'm getting mixed messages on what would be desired. We made the later Chinooks lighter due to the many complaints about the weight of the earlier models. Most of the "I love the older models" was based on their appearance and not their performance. I am working on a Chinook and I did speak with James about it, bu we didn't go into details. I had thought to use the Power lock, but have recently changed my thinking to a Compression Lock. I haven't spoken with James about it, Maybe we can get him to chime in here?

sal
User avatar
Enactive
Member
Posts: 2043
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 8:19 pm
Location: Wet side of Washington

Re: Chinook Confusion

#50

Post by Enactive »

mikey177 wrote:
Sun Feb 05, 2023 9:47 pm
Enactive wrote:
Sun Feb 05, 2023 9:16 pm
It will be interesting to see if the C5 uses the power lock.

In last year's Chinook 5 thread, Sa was leaning toward the compression lock, but I don't know if that has changed.

sal wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 7:19 pm
So I'm getting mixed messages on what would be desired. We made the later Chinooks lighter due to the many complaints about the weight of the earlier models. Most of the "I love the older models" was based on their appearance and not their performance. I am working on a Chinook and I did speak with James about it, bu we didn't go into details. I had thought to use the Power lock, but have recently changed my thinking to a Compression Lock. I haven't spoken with James about it, Maybe we can get him to chime in here?

sal
Thanks, Mikey.
mikey177
Member
Posts: 2181
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 12:33 am
Location: Philippines

Re: Chinook Confusion

#51

Post by mikey177 »

You're welcome.
User avatar
Cl1ff
Member
Posts: 1129
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2019 4:35 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Chinook Confusion

#52

Post by Cl1ff »

Oh, thanks for reminding me of that!
I might need to start looking for a Chinnok 4 before they’re too hard to find, if I want that Powerlock.
A Chinook with a Compression Lock is interesting in its own way, though!
rex121 is the king of steel, but nature’s teeth have been cutting for hundreds of millions of years and counting :cool:
aicolainen
Member
Posts: 1797
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2019 4:08 am
Location: Norway

Re: Chinook Confusion

#53

Post by aicolainen »

The Chinook 4 was on a pretty aggressive sale on Lamnia last year, but it was still not nothing. Considered it briefly, just for the lock, but it was deemed to be a dust collector.
I like some of the odd balls, especially those that have features you don't find everywhere, even if they don't have a ton of practical use. The Chinook 4 was a little to much money and absolutely zero identifiable use.
Seeing this discussion now, makes me wonder if I made the right choice. I think I did, but I'm incurably curious and it's always hard to let these interesting knives go.
User avatar
Bolster
Member
Posts: 5626
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: CalyFRNia

Re: Chinook Confusion

#54

Post by Bolster »

aicolainen wrote:
Mon Feb 06, 2023 2:39 pm
The Chinook 4 was a little too much money and absolutely zero identifiable use.
Seeing this discussion now, makes me wonder if I made the right choice. I think I did, but I'm incurably curious and it's always hard to let these interesting knives go.

If your use is like mine, then yes, a dust collector. My C3 makes it out of the box for a very rare SD carry. It's heaver than I like to carry, it screams evil intent if I'm searched, and I always have a problem using blades with large bellies and acute tips for practical purposes. I don't know Keating's raking, tip-twisting techniques, though I've read about them. I keep it for its looks...it's a bizarro vicious lookin' blade. Practical? For my use...not so much. It does help weight down my sock drawer, so there's that.

And yet...if the C5 has a more traditional bowie style blade like the C1...I'd be tempted again.
Steel novice who self-identifies as a steel expert. Proud M.N.O.S.D. member 0003. Spydie Steels: 4V, 15V, 20CV, AEB-L, AUS6, Cru-Wear, HAP40, K294, K390, M4, Magnacut, S110V, S30V, S35VN, S45VN, SPY27, SRS13, T15, VG10, XHP, ZWear, ZDP189
aicolainen
Member
Posts: 1797
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2019 4:08 am
Location: Norway

Re: Chinook Confusion

#55

Post by aicolainen »

Bolster wrote:
Mon Feb 06, 2023 3:29 pm
And yet...if the C5 has a more traditional bowie style blade like the C1...I'd be tempted again.
There is no cure for what we suffer from.
Oh, on that note, did I mention I just bought a fully murdered out Matriarch 2?
JRinFL
Member
Posts: 6147
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:30 am
Location: Unfashionable West End of the Galaxy (SE USA)

Re: Chinook Confusion

#56

Post by JRinFL »

Lockwork pictures of my Chinook 4.

Closed:
73AFB9F6-B263-4326-BA85-966993105A1D.jpeg
Locked:
E862B4C3-3929-4463-B385-8F661ECA1F01.jpeg
Partially unlocked:
C84C539E-3D6D-431A-9EC5-EA77D6513C09.jpeg
"...it costs nothing to be polite." - Winston Churchill
“Maybe the cheese in the mousetrap is an artificially created cheaper price?” -Sal
Friends call me Jim. As do my foes.
M.N.O.S.D. 0001
User avatar
5-by-5
Member
Posts: 1082
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2017 5:12 pm
Location: Puget Sound

Re: Chinook Confusion

#57

Post by 5-by-5 »

sal wrote:
Wed Feb 01, 2023 10:56 pm
We're working on a new Chinook.

sal
Hope you fix the tip-up only issue. :thinking
User avatar
Cl1ff
Member
Posts: 1129
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2019 4:35 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Chinook Confusion

#58

Post by Cl1ff »

JRinFL wrote:
Mon Feb 06, 2023 6:10 pm
Lockwork pictures of my Chinook 4.

Closed:
73AFB9F6-B263-4326-BA85-966993105A1D.jpeg

Locked:
E862B4C3-3929-4463-B385-8F661ECA1F01.jpeg

Partially unlocked:
C84C539E-3D6D-431A-9EC5-EA77D6513C09.jpeg
Thank you!
There are definitely some interesting modifications of the lock compared to the Tatanka’s.
There is no stop pin and the blade’s tang rests on the lock piece a bit differently. The washers are also smaller.
rex121 is the king of steel, but nature’s teeth have been cutting for hundreds of millions of years and counting :cool:
User avatar
Naperville
Member
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 2:58 am
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: Chinook Confusion

#59

Post by Naperville »

I like the cut of the blade and the profile on the Chinook 1. Neat knife.
I support the 2nd Amendment Organizations of GOA, NRA, FPC, SAF, and "Knife Rights"
T2T: https://tunnel2towers.org; Special Operations Wounded Warriors: https://sowwcharity.com/
Murindo
Member
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2019 3:47 pm

Re: Chinook Confusion

#60

Post by Murindo »

This is a pic of Jim Keating's custom Chinook that came before the Chinook 1
Attachments
chintrnr2.jpg
Post Reply