Temporal Edge Retention

Discuss Spyderco's products and history.
User avatar
Manifestgtr
Member
Posts: 354
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2021 4:43 pm
Location: Lowell, MA

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#21

Post by Manifestgtr »

CPM Cruwear exhibiting extreme temporal retention of front end sharpness:
DCDF2148-794D-45C8-9E23-7F3FD22D4751.jpeg
Found a hair on my jacket this afternoon and figured “might as well”. After two months the PM2 is almost exactly as sharp as I left it in early January. I remember sharpening it right around the new year and thinking “2023 is off to a good start”.

Truth be told, I don’t remember the stropping grit but it was probably 2k since that’s where I like to keep my cruwear. I’m also not particularly difficult on this knife. If I have a lot of work to do, I grab an endura or a stretch…so this isn’t a comment on cruwear’s slicing edge retention. Just an observation on how well it’s kept its extreme front end sharpness over the course of two months.
Crucarta: Shaman (x2), Manix 2, Lil Native, Delica, GB2 & PM2
Notable: 52100 and Cruwear Millie. “15v-arta” Shaman. REC Manix. K-carta Endura, P4, Dragonfly and Delica.
Favorites: Shaman, Sage 5 lightweight, Sheeps Caribbean, Manix, Endela and all things Stretch
ikaretababy
Member
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 8:39 pm

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#22

Post by ikaretababy »

Deadboxhero wrote:
Wed Feb 01, 2023 6:47 pm
The exact mechanism of why it moves is not known. However there are some clues that could be in understanding more about the elastic/plastic transition of knife steels on a microscopic scale since bulk properties of a material can be different than on a microscopic scale.
could it be the metal expanding or contracting teeny tiny amounts because of ambient temperature changes and thats enough to alter the orientation of the very small amount of steel in a small burr?
Bemo
Member
Posts: 1299
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2019 6:00 pm
Location: Boise Idaho

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#23

Post by Bemo »

It's all about quantum entanglement.
User avatar
RustyIron
Member
Posts: 2393
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2019 9:01 pm
Location: La Habra, CA
Contact:

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#24

Post by RustyIron »

Manifestgtr wrote:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 11:10 am
Any results I get are from a sample size of precisely one. That doesn’t escape me…I know that science thrives on repeatability and objectivity above all else.


Nonsense! Real science is based on Tik Tok Videos, who gets the most likes, and who talks the loudest.
😂

Your experiment inspired me to give it a shot. So now we'll have a sample size of two guys using different methodology in wildly uncontrolled environments. But as long as we're having fun, it will be a worthy endeavor.

I sharpened up a Manix 2 Maxamet and chopped up some filament on my super-technological homemade sharpness tester. The measurements are scribbled down, the knife put away, and my calendar marked for March 27.

If I was a betting man, it would be that the readings are going to be similar in a month.
Time will tell...
IMG_0148 copy.jpeg
IMG_0148 copy.jpeg (53.67 KiB) Viewed 777 times
User avatar
RustyIron
Member
Posts: 2393
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2019 9:01 pm
Location: La Habra, CA
Contact:

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#25

Post by RustyIron »


It's been exactly thirty days, so I whipped out my trusty Manix 2 LW Maxamet and put it to work cutting filament. Thirty days ago I marked the blade and scribbled down 112 grams. Today I repeated the test as similarly as possible, and the average pressure to cut the filament was 114 grams. From this sample of one, I'm going to go out on a limb and claim unequivocally that blades do not spontaneously dull themselves while sitting unused in my desk drawer.

User avatar
ladybug93
Member
Posts: 8014
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 11:20 pm

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#26

Post by ladybug93 »

RustyIron wrote:
Wed Mar 29, 2023 5:50 pm

It's been exactly thirty days, so I whipped out my trusty Manix 2 LW Maxamet and put it to work cutting filament. Thirty days ago I marked the blade and scribbled down 112 grams. Today I repeated the test as similarly as possible, and the average pressure to cut the filament was 114 grams. From this sample of one, I'm going to go out on a limb and claim unequivocally that blades do not spontaneously dull themselves while sitting unused in my desk drawer.

i know this isn't spyderco related, but i'd be curious to see a similar test with something like 1095. i've had that go dull on me while in my closet, i'm pretty sure.
keep your knife sharp and your focus sharper.
current collection:
C253GBBK, C258GFBL, C101GBBK2, C11GYW, C11FWNB20CV, C101GBN15V2, C101GODFDE2, C60GGY, C149G, C189, C101GBN2, MT35, C211TI, C242CF, C217GSSF, C101BN2, C85G2, C91BBK, C142G, C122GBBK, LBK, LYL3HB, C193, C28YL2, C11ZPGYD, C41YL5, C252G, C130G, PLKIT1
spyderco steels:
CPM 20CV, CPM 15V, CTS 204P, CPM CRUWEAR, CPM S30V, N690Co, M390, CPM MagnaCut, LC200N, CTS XHP, H1, 8Cr13MoV, GIN-1, CTS BD1, VG-10, VG-10/Damascus, 440C
User avatar
sal
Member
Posts: 17029
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Golden, Colorado USA

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#27

Post by sal »

I don't think it's quantum entanglement or Tik Tok. It's Astrology; Your knife will go dull when Mars is in Uranus.

sal
dan31
Member
Posts: 467
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 10:15 pm
Location: SF Bay Area

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#28

Post by dan31 »

🤣 good one Sal!
prndltech
Member
Posts: 3132
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 10:53 am
Location: 512

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#29

Post by prndltech »

Im pretty sure it’s the same gnomes that steal your socks in the dryer
- Shannon

MNOSD 0006
User avatar
RustyIron
Member
Posts: 2393
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2019 9:01 pm
Location: La Habra, CA
Contact:

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#30

Post by RustyIron »

I don't think it's quantum entanglement or Tik Tok. It's Astrology; Your knife will go dull when Mars is in Uranus.

Kristi! Kristi!
See what he did there?
User avatar
Kevinim82
Member
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2019 12:04 pm

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#31

Post by Kevinim82 »

RustyIron wrote:
Thu Mar 30, 2023 12:13 am
I don't think it's quantum entanglement or Tik Tok. It's Astrology; Your knife will go dull when Mars is in Uranus.

Kristi! Kristi!
See what he did there?
Hahahahahahhaha!!!!

Sal has a good point! It’s hard to see though, you see, Uranus is not visible to the unaided eye.
😂
Was never a space cadet, but with LC200N I might be more in space than a cadet.

MNOSD 0009
User avatar
Kevinim82
Member
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2019 12:04 pm

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#32

Post by Kevinim82 »

This image is for reference to Sal’s comment.
Attachments
D48E7E2E-562F-4A02-A4CF-DFBB8F0F463E.jpeg
Was never a space cadet, but with LC200N I might be more in space than a cadet.

MNOSD 0009
Bill1170
Member
Posts: 2782
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: San Diego North County

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#33

Post by Bill1170 »

Astrology aside, maybe repeat the test on some stainless steel blades? I recall the theory being posited that some stainless steels “relax” over time from a keen apex to a more rounded one. My sense was that this was observed as a 440A/440B problem.
User avatar
sal
Member
Posts: 17029
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Golden, Colorado USA

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#34

Post by sal »

I hear some interesting arguments for Chromium being the culprit due to Chrome Oxide.

sal
User avatar
u.w.
Member
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 7:25 am
Location: VABch

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#35

Post by u.w. »

sal wrote:
Thu Mar 30, 2023 3:19 pm
I hear some interesting arguments for Chromium being the culprit due to Chrome Oxide.

sal
LOL again! and if not chrome (oxide) lol... perhaps Klingons in the vicinity of Uranus ...

u.w.
User avatar
Bolster
Member
Posts: 5597
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: CalyFRNia

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#36

Post by Bolster »

u.w. wrote:
Thu Mar 30, 2023 5:08 pm
sal wrote:
Thu Mar 30, 2023 3:19 pm
I hear some interesting arguments for Chromium being the culprit due to Chrome Oxide.

sal
LOL again! and if not chrome (oxide) lol... perhaps Klingons in the vicinity of Uranus ...

u.w.

Wait a sec, I can't tell if this is a joke or not. Chromium does produce an oxide, being "readily oxidized by the atmosphere." It looks like there are actually several types of chromium oxides. I'm not a chemist, but if there are ferric oxides (ie, rust) that dulls, why wouldn't chromium oxides also dull?
Steel novice who self-identifies as a steel expert. Proud M.N.O.S.D. member 0003. Spydie Steels: 4V, 15V, 20CV, AEB-L, AUS6, Cru-Wear, HAP40, K294, K390, M4, Magnacut, S110V, S30V, S35VN, S45VN, SPY27, SRS13, T15, VG10, XHP, ZWear, ZDP189
User avatar
Bolster
Member
Posts: 5597
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: CalyFRNia

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#37

Post by Bolster »

RustyIron wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 3:52 pm
IMG_0148 copy.jpeg

I like your tester! I want to make one like it! Question: How do you get the filament stretched across at the same tightness each time? I assume that matters but I could be argued out of that notion.
Attachments
IMG_0148 copy.jpeg
IMG_0148 copy.jpeg (53.67 KiB) Viewed 524 times
Steel novice who self-identifies as a steel expert. Proud M.N.O.S.D. member 0003. Spydie Steels: 4V, 15V, 20CV, AEB-L, AUS6, Cru-Wear, HAP40, K294, K390, M4, Magnacut, S110V, S30V, S35VN, S45VN, SPY27, SRS13, T15, VG10, XHP, ZWear, ZDP189
DunninLA
Member
Posts: 119
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:32 am

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#38

Post by DunninLA »

Here is my hypothesis. I don't believe it possible for the shape of an apex to change sitting idly over time.

1. you sharpened the chaparral very well, either by luck, or b/c XHP is easy to sharpen and propely debur.
2. on another knife, you left a small burr, but the burr was straight so the knife cut like it was sharp, and you cut with that knife a couple of times... which caused the burr to move to one side, thus dulling the knife, but you didn't notice it.
3. You pull out the knife from #2 a couple of months later, and notice it isn't as sharp as when you first sharpened it. But you forgot you used the knife a couple of times and weren't paying attention to its sharpness. That is, that knife was dull when you put it away for two months.
JD Spydo
Member
Posts: 23547
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Blue Springs, Missouri

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#39

Post by JD Spydo »

WilliamMunny wrote:
Wed Feb 01, 2023 6:19 pm
I could be nuts, but I always felt my S30V Manix is like this. I will sharpen it, let it sit for awhile, few weeks, then it just does not have the same bite.
I use to experience that with my older Benchmade Boguszewski Spike model ( ATS-34 blade steel). It seemed like it always got dull quickly and I was always extremely careful with it. For whatever reason I found myself spending a lot of time maintaining it's edge and it always seemed to get dull very easily. The ATS-34 blade on most Benchmade models were not nearly as well heat treated as the ATS-34 Spyderco blades were>> it sure seemed that way. And just to think at one time ATS-34 was considered a "supersteel" among knife enthusiasts.
User avatar
RustyIron
Member
Posts: 2393
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2019 9:01 pm
Location: La Habra, CA
Contact:

Re: Temporal Edge Retention

#40

Post by RustyIron »

Bolster wrote:
Thu Mar 30, 2023 6:26 pm
I like your tester! I want to make one like it! Question: How do you get the filament stretched across at the same tightness each time? I assume that matters but I could be argued out of that notion.

Thanks. It's just a chunk of round aluminum into which I carved some slots and added a couple screws. It's silly and pointless, but sometimes I just like to measure things. It makes me feel better to be able to put a number to my sharpening. Without numeric data, evaluating sharpness is just someone's subjective impressions.

Good question on the filament tension. My ultra-precise tensioner is my fingers. I pull it taught, tighten the screw, and call it good. If I do a bunch of identical tests, the variation of my readings is about 5%. Part of that variation is surely filament tension. But there are so many other potential sources of inaccuracy that it doesn't really matter. I'm happy with 5%.

I copied my contraption from pictures of a commercial product. I don't know what kind of accuracy is attainable with that one. I expect that it will be similar to mine.
Post Reply