Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

Discuss Spyderco's products and history.
Catamount123
Member
Posts: 407
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 7:03 pm

Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#1

Post by Catamount123 »

As a fan of :spyder: s with thinner blades (3mm and less), I am curious why most blades made in Golden are on the thicker side (3.2mm and up)? The only exceptions I could find in the catalog are the Autonomy (2.9mm), Janisong (3mm), and the UKPK (2.5mm).
Last edited by Catamount123 on Wed Apr 21, 2021 2:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I don't get people who only carry one knife :thinking ;)
MFlovejp
Member
Posts: 484
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:06 pm
Location: Alaska

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#2

Post by MFlovejp »

Perhaps because the trend in the US is somewhat in the theme that “all knives are survival knives” and must be able to be stabbed through a truck hood and used to baton firewood, etc. Knife afi’s seem a little obsessed with the idea of ultimate strength at the moment, but tastes do cycle.
Current Carries: Military 4V, Stretch XL Cruwear, Sage 1 CF, Siren Sprint S90V, ZDP Delica
Wishlist: Cruwear Military, Super Blue Caly 3.5
Favorite Steels: CTS-XHP, Cruwear, ZDP-189, LC200N
skeeg11
Member
Posts: 1478
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2020 11:45 pm

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#3

Post by skeeg11 »

US standards I suppose. 1/8" = 3.2mm.
User avatar
Evil D
Member
Posts: 27147
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 9:48 pm
Location: Northern KY

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#4

Post by Evil D »

Probably has as much to do with what thickness steel is available in as anything else.
All SE all the time since 2017
~David
User avatar
Matus
Member
Posts: 1736
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 10:48 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#5

Post by Matus »

US paint cans are harder to pry open :p
... I like weird :bug-red :bug-white-red :bug-white ...
Catamount123
Member
Posts: 407
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 7:03 pm

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#6

Post by Catamount123 »

skeeg11 wrote:
Wed Apr 21, 2021 2:25 pm
US standards I suppose. 1/8" = 3.2mm.

That makes some sense. It would be interesting to get the official word from Spyderco, assuming it’s not proprietary info. On a knife like the Lil’ Native, for instance, it would seem to make sense to go < 3mm.
I don't get people who only carry one knife :thinking ;)
User avatar
Matus
Member
Posts: 1736
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 10:48 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#7

Post by Matus »

Nah, Spyderco is ordering enough steel to get it precision ground to whatever dimension they need.
... I like weird :bug-red :bug-white-red :bug-white ...
James Y
Member
Posts: 8076
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Southern CA

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#8

Post by James Y »

Do other manufacturers of US-made knives (that also sometimes use S30V in their custom shop), like Buck and their 110, have blades the same thickness at the spine as, say, a Military or PM2?

I have CRKs in S30V and S35VN, none of which are as thick at the spine as the Military or PM2.

I imagine it’s mostly to do with the individual knife design, and whatever blade thickness has been determined will work best for it.

Jim
User avatar
abbazaba
Member
Posts: 4696
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 3:40 pm
Location: New England

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#9

Post by abbazaba »

I think the OVERBUILT trend is starting to fade, making way for thinner stock. I'm still hoping for some "skinny" versions of Golden classics (namely a PM2 Skinny Backlock ;) There seem to be enough threads about skinny versions of various models to confirm the market is there for them. The best thing that Hinderer did to the XM18 was releasing a Skinny version, making it a better knife in every sense IMO.
JRinFL
Member
Posts: 6147
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:30 am
Location: Unfashionable West End of the Galaxy (SE USA)

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#10

Post by JRinFL »

MFlovejp wrote:
Wed Apr 21, 2021 2:24 pm
Perhaps because the trend in the US is somewhat in the theme that “all knives are survival knives” and must be able to be stabbed through a truck hood and used to baton firewood, etc. Knife afi’s seem a little obsessed with the idea of ultimate strength at the moment, but tastes do cycle.
^ This is pretty much it. The broader market wants thicker blades. It probably helps keep complaints about broken blades down a bit as well.
"...it costs nothing to be polite." - Winston Churchill
“Maybe the cheese in the mousetrap is an artificially created cheaper price?” -Sal
Friends call me Jim. As do my foes.
M.N.O.S.D. 0001
User avatar
JakeXman
Member
Posts: 192
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 3:15 pm

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#11

Post by JakeXman »

I wonder if the widespread use of the compression lock in Golden has anything to do with the thickness of the stock. It seems to me that the blade thickness is a bit more important on a compression lock than a lockback for instance simply due to the way the lock engages with the tang. Maybe the number of compression lock models makes ordering one thickness of steel more cost effective?

Exceptions like the Ikuchi come to mind, but that’s from Taiwan.
Tenacious G10 PE, Tasman Salt 2 PE, Tasman Salt 2 SE, Yojimbo 2, KJ Endura 4 D.P.S. 15 VG-10, LadyBug K390, TKJ Jester 20CV, UKPK Salt, Crucarta PM2, 204 Sharpmaker
James Y
Member
Posts: 8076
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Southern CA

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#12

Post by James Y »

JakeXman wrote:
Wed Apr 21, 2021 6:56 pm
I wonder if the widespread use of the compression lock in Golden has anything to do with the thickness of the stock. It seems to me that the blade thickness is a bit more important on a compression lock than a lockback for instance simply due to the way the lock engages with the tang. Maybe the number of compression lock models makes ordering one thickness of steel more cost effective?

Exceptions like the Ikuchi come to mind, but that’s from Taiwan.

That’s a great point. Same with the Millie’s liner lock. The blade stock thickness provides more surface for contact area, and wear over time.

Jim
JohnDoe99
Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Sun May 17, 2020 1:29 pm

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#13

Post by JohnDoe99 »

abbazaba wrote:
Wed Apr 21, 2021 2:51 pm
I think the OVERBUILT trend is starting to fade, making way for thinner stock. I'm still hoping for some "skinny" versions of Golden classics (namely a PM2 Skinny Backlock ;) There seem to be enough threads about skinny versions of various models to confirm the market is there for them. The best thing that Hinderer did to the XM18 was releasing a Skinny version, making it a better knife in every sense IMO.
It depends on where you want the strength. I always prefer strong blade tangs/pivots like those of the Military, Paramilitary, Manix, and the Native. When I carried the Endura, I always felt like the blade was going to snap off. Of course it wasn't but I was experiencing tang anxiety. The blade profiles on all the American knives feels right.

Bring back the big knives. The Szabo, the G10 police, Ulize, the original Calypso. No more downsizing.
User avatar
Abyss_Fish
Member
Posts: 811
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:23 pm
Location: Minnesota, USA.

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#14

Post by Abyss_Fish »

That's why I mostly stick with Taichungs, so slicey... There's definitely something to be said for the strength and rigidity of Golden models though, I love the Native 5 for that exact reason. But it's really more about overall build and design.

There's also not all that big of a gap, only about a +.005" difference in average bte measurement between my Taichungs and my Natives. It's only noticeable when trying to make your way through heavy plastic or something, the blade shapes make more of a difference. If we were talking about kitchen knives I'd be more upset about .005", but in this case, meh.
Lightly insane.

Current spydie collection: Watu, Rhino, UKPK Salt G10 bladeswap, Yojimbo 2 Smooth G10 Cru-Wear, Manix lw “mystic” 20cv, SmallFly 2, Waterway, Ladybug k390, Caribbean
Current favorite steels: sg2/R2, lc200n/Z-FiNit, 3v
User avatar
Evil D
Member
Posts: 27147
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 9:48 pm
Location: Northern KY

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#15

Post by Evil D »

JakeXman wrote:
Wed Apr 21, 2021 6:56 pm
I wonder if the widespread use of the compression lock in Golden has anything to do with the thickness of the stock. It seems to me that the blade thickness is a bit more important on a compression lock than a lockback for instance simply due to the way the lock engages with the tang. Maybe the number of compression lock models makes ordering one thickness of steel more cost effective?

Exceptions like the Ikuchi come to mind, but that’s from Taiwan.


I think locks in general have benefited from thicker blade stock, whether it's from a wider lock face to wear along in a compression lock or liner lock, or just more steel contact as with a back lock. The compression lock can definitely be ran with thinner blade stock though, the Ouroboros has one and is only 2.5mm so it seems possible to have a 2.5mm Para 2 or whatever.
All SE all the time since 2017
~David
Igi964
Member
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 5:10 am
Location: Slovakia

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#16

Post by Igi964 »

Not only they are thick blades, they are also thick BTE and edge angles are 20°per side or worse. I tried PM2, Manix and Military in more examples and all where like that. K390 Endura came 13° per side and sliced like nothing from Golden I had. As much as I like the designs and S110V steel. I stoped buying from Golden factory 😠☹️😡
Worm
Member
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:06 am
Location: Germany

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#17

Post by Worm »

I agree with most comments. In my experience:

Manix 2, Para 3, Native 5, Native Chief:
Real solid build quality, but not very good slicers due to thick blade stock and BTE thickness.
These perform well for heavy cutting when you apply almost your whole body weight on the knife.
Or when you don't have to slice through material and just cut on the surface of an object.

Delica, Endela, PacSalt:
Better or easier slicing through material, but less solid build quality with less solid blade lock up (especially lateral blade movement).
I guess newer models like the Stretch 2 will have better blade lock up due to larger pivot area.

Taichung Models I like the most because of thin blade stock & BTE:
GB2, Chaparral, Sage series

I wish thick blade stock from Golden blades would be ground thinner BTE.
If chipping occurs you can always sharpen the knives and it will get thicker BTE with time.

Regarding Compression Lock:
The Watu has only 2,5 mm blade stock and I think a much thinner BTE compared to Golden models (currently on my wish list over the PM2).
MFlovejp
Member
Posts: 484
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:06 pm
Location: Alaska

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#18

Post by MFlovejp »

One Golden model that has exactly the right blade thickness for me is the Military. The taper on that design is so well done that it has an appreciable section of fairly thin blade toward the tip. The Manix is just a little thicker than my current taste, but still a wonderful knife once I thinned the edge out a bit. The Native 5 is a stout little thing and I love the ergonomics, it's a bit more heavily built than I generally need but it has its place as well. I moved my Para 3 LW along because, well, because it wasn't a Military haha. Edge was a little too thick for my taste but the fidget factor was excellent. The Chief is similar to the military in that the longer edge gives you a nice thin section and a thicker proximal section for cutting thicker and tougher materials. Sounds like I just need to stick to the longer-bladed models, which is just fine with me haha.
Current Carries: Military 4V, Stretch XL Cruwear, Sage 1 CF, Siren Sprint S90V, ZDP Delica
Wishlist: Cruwear Military, Super Blue Caly 3.5
Favorite Steels: CTS-XHP, Cruwear, ZDP-189, LC200N
User avatar
bearfacedkiller
Member
Posts: 11412
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 1:22 pm
Location: hiding in the woods...

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#19

Post by bearfacedkiller »

The distal tapers definitely help.

The 3.7mm stock is good on the Military and adequate on the Para2 but on the Para3 it is a bit of a head scratcher.
-Darby
sal wrote:Knife afi's are pretty far out, steel junky's more so, but "edge junky's" are just nuts. :p
SpyderEdgeForever wrote: Also, do you think a kangaroo would eat a bowl of spagetti with sauce if someone offered it to them?
User avatar
VooDooChild
Member
Posts: 2623
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2018 1:29 am

Re: Why are most Golden blades on the thicker side?

#20

Post by VooDooChild »

The bladestock is thick, but between the flat grind, distal taper, and swedge on the back, the native 5 isnt as thick as the specs suggest. It slices very well.
"Rome's greatest contribution to mathematics was the killing of Archimedes."
Post Reply