M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

Discuss Spyderco's products and history.
User avatar
Larrin
Member
Posts: 867
Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 9:27 am
Contact:

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#21

Post by Larrin »

sal wrote:
Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:30 am
Thanx Larrin,

Very informative, as usual.

FYI, we have almost 5,000 lbs coming in different thicknesses.

sal
I hope it works out well!
http://www.KnifeSteelNerds.com - Steel Metallurgy topics related to knives
User avatar
sal
Member
Posts: 17042
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Golden, Colorado USA

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#22

Post by sal »

Hi Larrin,

We'll see? The only real way to "know" a blade steel is to use it in "Real-World-Testing". While many don't care, there seems to be a growing number of Blade Afi's that do.

sal
The Meat man
Member
Posts: 5858
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2018 8:01 pm
Location: Missouri, USA

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#23

Post by The Meat man »

sal wrote:
Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:30 am
Thanx Larrin,

Very informative, as usual.

FYI, we have almost 5,000 lbs coming in different thicknesses.

sal
5,000 lbs of M398?? Wow that is a lot!! :eek:
- Connor

"What is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?"
Bill1170
Member
Posts: 2785
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: San Diego North County

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#24

Post by Bill1170 »

5000 pounds! Spyderco must truly think this alloy has potential. I’m curious to see what they do with it.
User avatar
legOFwhat?
Member
Posts: 3140
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 5:58 am
Location: Kentucky; Earth

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#25

Post by legOFwhat? »

Tucson Tom wrote:
Tue Oct 27, 2020 9:17 am
TomAiello wrote:
Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:35 pm
We definitely need an M398 Mule. :)
I was feeling relieved to see that this was a steel I could simply not get interested in. Until this comment came along .... :rolleyes:
Did somone say mule?
Image

:D
-Larry
Hebrews 13:6 So we may boldly say: “The Lord is my helper; I will not fear. What can man do to me?”
MNOSD #0049
JRinFL
Member
Posts: 6147
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:30 am
Location: Unfashionable West End of the Galaxy (SE USA)

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#26

Post by JRinFL »

Well, based on Larrin's assessment, I won't be rushing out to get a knife in this steel. I'll withhold final judgment until actual knifes are made and tested, however.

Edited to add: Really "knifes"? I do know it is knives. :woozy
Last edited by JRinFL on Mon Aug 23, 2021 9:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
"...it costs nothing to be polite." - Winston Churchill
“Maybe the cheese in the mousetrap is an artificially created cheaper price?” -Sal
Friends call me Jim. As do my foes.
M.N.O.S.D. 0001
DDK
Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue May 26, 2020 3:54 pm

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#27

Post by DDK »

So if I read correctly, at 1 point higher on the HRC scale, s125v is barely outdone by m398 in toughness, while holding an edge for reasonably longer. I feel like at that higher end wouldn't more folks be interested in s125v? Also with lower carbide volume, it may be less tough, bit perhaps it will have better edge stability?
DDK
Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue May 26, 2020 3:54 pm

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#28

Post by DDK »

At any rate, cpm-15v FTW 👹
JD Spydo
Member
Posts: 23549
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Blue Springs, Missouri

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#29

Post by JD Spydo »

Bill1170 wrote:
Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:16 pm
5000 pounds! Spyderco must truly think this alloy has potential. I’m curious to see what they do with it.
I'm also very curious as to how it performs in full SE. I was pleasantly surprised when a good friend of mine showed me how good XHP was in full SE with two Cold Steel SE folders he got. I found it similar to 440V in SE and that steel has been one of my favorite SE steels for some time now.

It sounds to me like it might be a good steel for fixed blades in SE & PE both. But like Sal Said until you test in real world cutting jobs you never know until you do. But I've got a gut feeling that it would be another good SE blade steel.
User avatar
Larrin
Member
Posts: 867
Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 9:27 am
Contact:

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#30

Post by Larrin »

DDK wrote:
Fri Oct 30, 2020 1:03 am
So if I read correctly, at 1 point higher on the HRC scale, s125v is barely outdone by m398 in toughness, while holding an edge for reasonably longer. I feel like at that higher end wouldn't more folks be interested in s125v? Also with lower carbide volume, it may be less tough, bit perhaps it will have better edge stability?
S125V does not have more carbide volume than M398, it has a little bit less, hence why the S125V is a bit tougher when compensating for hardness (along with a bit smaller carbides). S125V is better for toughness-edge retention but worse for corrosion resistance. The M398 is probably also easier to sharpen when using aluminum oxide or ceramic abrasives. S90V has only slightly less edge retention than M398 while being significantly tougher.
http://www.KnifeSteelNerds.com - Steel Metallurgy topics related to knives
DDK
Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue May 26, 2020 3:54 pm

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#31

Post by DDK »

Larrin wrote:
Fri Oct 30, 2020 10:31 am
DDK wrote:
Fri Oct 30, 2020 1:03 am
So if I read correctly, at 1 point higher on the HRC scale, s125v is barely outdone by m398 in toughness, while holding an edge for reasonably longer. I feel like at that higher end wouldn't more folks be interested in s125v? Also with lower carbide volume, it may be less tough, bit perhaps it will have better edge stability?
S125V does not have more carbide volume than M398, it has a little bit less, hence why the S125V is a bit tougher when compensating for hardness (along with a bit smaller carbides). S125V is better for toughness-edge retention but worse for corrosion resistance. The M398 is probably also easier to sharpen when using aluminum oxide or ceramic abrasives. S90V has only slightly less edge retention than M398 while being significantly tougher.
Interesting! Thank you for the info. So a slight edge retention increase over s90v, and a large loss in toughness.. I'll still probably pass, but it's always good to have more new steel in the production market!
XuZaX
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:45 pm

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#32

Post by XuZaX »

so uh.  Where are these m398 knives at.   Would love a para 3. 
Michael Janich
Member
Posts: 2997
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Longmont, CO USA
Contact:

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#33

Post by Michael Janich »

Dear XuZaX:

Welcome to the Spyderco forum.

Stay safe,

Mike
JRinFL
Member
Posts: 6147
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:30 am
Location: Unfashionable West End of the Galaxy (SE USA)

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#34

Post by JRinFL »

Larrin wrote:
Fri Oct 30, 2020 10:31 am
DDK wrote:
Fri Oct 30, 2020 1:03 am
So if I read correctly, at 1 point higher on the HRC scale, s125v is barely outdone by m398 in toughness, while holding an edge for reasonably longer. I feel like at that higher end wouldn't more folks be interested in s125v? Also with lower carbide volume, it may be less tough, bit perhaps it will have better edge stability?
S125V does not have more carbide volume than M398, it has a little bit less, hence why the S125V is a bit tougher when compensating for hardness (along with a bit smaller carbides). S125V is better for toughness-edge retention but worse for corrosion resistance. The M398 is probably also easier to sharpen when using aluminum oxide or ceramic abrasives. S90V has only slightly less edge retention than M398 while being significantly tougher.
Highlighted area is probably important to note.
"...it costs nothing to be polite." - Winston Churchill
“Maybe the cheese in the mousetrap is an artificially created cheaper price?” -Sal
Friends call me Jim. As do my foes.
M.N.O.S.D. 0001
Steeltoez83
Member
Posts: 439
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2020 8:51 am

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#35

Post by Steeltoez83 »

Screenshot_20210823-112957_Gallery.jpg
This is a custom trapper i bought from triple b in m398. I usually grab the other custom i own of his much more than this one truth be told. However this is a full handmade custom, so the heat treat, geometry, etc shouldnt be compared to production capabilities imo. I would like to do side by side comparisons to see how spyderco is heat treating this steel when the time comes. I will try to score a mule when possible if spyderco makes it. And i get the opportunity to purchase one before they sell out.
"Nothing is built on stone; all is built on sand, but we must build as if the sand were stone."
User avatar
archangel
Member
Posts: 2372
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2015 2:02 pm
Location: Wuppertal, Germany, Earth

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#36

Post by archangel »

JRinFL wrote:
Mon Aug 23, 2021 9:47 am
Larrin wrote:
Fri Oct 30, 2020 10:31 am
DDK wrote:
Fri Oct 30, 2020 1:03 am
So if I read correctly, at 1 point higher on the HRC scale, s125v is barely outdone by m398 in toughness, while holding an edge for reasonably longer. I feel like at that higher end wouldn't more folks be interested in s125v? Also with lower carbide volume, it may be less tough, bit perhaps it will have better edge stability?
S125V does not have more carbide volume than M398, it has a little bit less, hence why the S125V is a bit tougher when compensating for hardness (along with a bit smaller carbides). S125V is better for toughness-edge retention but worse for corrosion resistance. The M398 is probably also easier to sharpen when using aluminum oxide or ceramic abrasives. S90V has only slightly less edge retention than M398 while being significantly tougher.
Highlighted area is probably important to note.

Yeah, but still... give it to us, Sal. ;) Pretty please....

Great thread revival, XuZaX!
Michael
48 Spydies, 44 different models, 43 different steels
.
Grail knife, still to be acquired: original Tuff by Ed Schempp Feel free to help me find one at a reasonable price...
User avatar
kobold
Member
Posts: 1817
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2020 12:38 am
Location: The Swamp

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#37

Post by kobold »

I wonder what 5000 lbs yields in - lets say - PM2 blades. My rough guesstimate is about 15000 blades. Optimistic?
Military/PM2/P3 Native Chief/Native GB2 DF2 PITS Chaparral Tasman Salt 2 SE Caribbean Sheepfoot SE SpydieChef Swayback Manix2 Sage 1 SSS Stretch 2 XL G10
JRinFL
Member
Posts: 6147
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:30 am
Location: Unfashionable West End of the Galaxy (SE USA)

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#38

Post by JRinFL »

kobold wrote:
Mon Aug 23, 2021 11:55 am
I wonder what 5000 lbs yields in - lets say - PM2 blades. My rough guesstimate is about 15000 blades. Optimistic?
I'm fairly certain some is reserved for Sal's & Eric's matching Iron Man suits. The remainder will go to blades.
"...it costs nothing to be polite." - Winston Churchill
“Maybe the cheese in the mousetrap is an artificially created cheaper price?” -Sal
Friends call me Jim. As do my foes.
M.N.O.S.D. 0001
Rp5
Member
Posts: 348
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2020 4:09 pm

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#39

Post by Rp5 »

JRinFL wrote:
Mon Aug 23, 2021 1:21 pm
kobold wrote:
Mon Aug 23, 2021 11:55 am
I wonder what 5000 lbs yields in - lets say - PM2 blades. My rough guesstimate is about 15000 blades. Optimistic?
I'm fairly certain some is reserved for Sal's & Eric's matching Iron Man suits. The remainder will go to blades.
Should be Steel suits if anything...
Image
User avatar
standy99
Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2017 11:07 am
Location: Between Broome and Cairns somewhere

Re: M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

#40

Post by standy99 »

I always wonder when I read these threads.

If laser cutting a sheet you loose 10% or more…..
Image

And

If you just melted all the steel left over sheets from 10 different steels.

What would you get… :thinking

Larrin is this something that would be neat or would it even be possible to combine 10 different steels….
Im a vegetarian as technically cows are made of grass and water.
Post Reply