Absolutely true of course.Sonorum wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 11:59 pmA good question that I haven't seen anybody do a specific test for.
A thin blade stock and thin primary grind improves cutting performance in that it passes through material better but so does thinning out the edge bevel. If the main grind is thick, a thinned out edge makes a huge difference. I had a Kizer which was way above 20 dps and that was dreadful to cut with until I took it down to 17 dps. The blade is still chunky and the edge bevel is wide but the performance is very different.
Maybe a question is, if the behind-the-edge thickness is really thin, how big a difference is there between 20 and 17 dps?
I took a PM2 down to 12 dps and it held up fine and seemed to slice a hole lot better. Looks funky though.
But while it is pretty easy to give a knife a more acute edge angle or thinning it out just behind the edge, it is not really an option (for me at least) to give it an overall thinner bladestock without special equipment (that most don´t have at home?)
So if the SpydieChef actually was made partly with food prep in mind (and I don´t know if this is the case!), I think a 2.5mm or even 2.00 mm blade stock would not have been a bad choice (though perhaps the concern here was that the frame lock requires thicker stock in order to provide enough lock interface to be really solid?!).
But then: I personally would like to see many Spydercos in a bit thinner stock (though to be fair: Spyderco does a good job on this already anyway compared to other brands).