Page 6 of 6

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2020 1:52 pm
by JRinFL
Doc Dan wrote:
Fri Oct 23, 2020 9:49 am
It is flat across the bottom, no belly on any of mine. It is a modified wharncliffe.

The wharncliffe is one of my most used blades cleaning squirrels and rabbits. It takes the feet, tail, and head off nicely. It is not great for skinning and gutting though. I like the wharcliffe for certain carving chores, too. It also makes a great exacto substitute.
Design change or did you sharpen the belly out? Kershaw https://kershaw.kaiusa.com/leek.html claims the blade to be a drop point and the picture shows a slight belly. At least on the current models.

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2020 4:12 pm
by Woodpuppy
I have a Leek, it is a useful blade shape; but I find the stainless steel handle too slick. And the handle overall too small.

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2020 11:40 pm
by Doc Dan
Yes, the handle is too slick, but we are talking wharncliffe blades. I like the blade design. There are some other Wharncliffe designs that I like, too. I like the shape of the We knife 705, but not the weird extra grinds. The Spyderco Swayback has a pretty awesome blade, too.

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2020 12:37 am
by skeeg11
Michael Janich wrote:
Fri Oct 23, 2020 6:56 am
With regard to "handedness," the deep hollow/flat combination does have a bias toward one hand. The original Ronin I designed for Snody was ground on the reverse side for righties. Most commercial chisel-ground knives that are not Japanese kitchen knives are ground on the obverse side so they "look right" in advertising.

Serrations are, by nature, a secondary chisel edge and also define handedness. The advantage of the deep hollow over a saber grind or flat is you can achieve a thinner behind-the-edge thickness and maintain it further up the blade. That mitigates the effect of the "handedness" issue.

Stay safe,

Mike
Hi Mike---

Appreciate your POV regarding primary and secondary chisel edge handedness.

Here's a whacky question for you:

If you have a chisel grind with one side having a high hollow which may induce mild steerage handedness, would putting serrations on the FFG side counteract some of the steerage handedness issues or make it the worst of both worlds? Of course that would make it no longer a chisel grind. Just wondering out loud here, but would appreciate your perspective.

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:14 am
by Michael Janich
Hey, Skeeg11:

That's an interesting idea. Ultimately the terminal cutting bevel of a serration creates its own "steerage," no matter which side it's on, so I don't think grinding it on the flat side would change things much--especially if the other side is properly ground as a high hollow.

Thinking about it more, the idea of combining serrations with a chisel grind with a high hollow would still require greater behind-the-edge thickness to support the structure of the serrations. That somewhat negates the benefits of the high hollow. I think it would have to be a careful balancing act.

Stay safe,

Mike

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:24 am
by skeeg11
Thanks Mike. Appreciate your thoughts.

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:50 pm
by araneae
Doc Dan wrote:
Fri Oct 23, 2020 9:49 am
It is flat across the bottom, no belly on any of mine. It is a modified wharncliffe.
My Leek definitely has a slight belly. Put your blade on a flat surface, mine only touches in the middle. I would not call that a Wharncliffe. If you put modified in front of the blade shape, it basically means it's "not a (insert blade shape) but has some resemblance". That, I suppose qualifies as a descriptor of the Leek, as would modified drop point.

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:36 pm
by Doc Dan
araneae wrote:
Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:50 pm
Doc Dan wrote:
Fri Oct 23, 2020 9:49 am
It is flat across the bottom, no belly on any of mine. It is a modified wharncliffe.
My Leek definitely has a slight belly. Put your blade on a flat surface, mine only touches in the middle. I would not call that a Wharncliffe. If you put modified in front of the blade shape, it basically means it's "not a (insert blade shape) but has some resemblance". That, I suppose qualifies as a descriptor of the Leek, as would modified drop point.
I got out a couple. The one I carried the most, a combo edge, is definitely flat. The other has a slight curve towards the tip. I see where our discrepancies are.

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 9:42 am
by speedseeker
I'd certainly be interested in anything Wharnie. Though, and I think Jazz has mentioned this in the past, 3.5 inches and under is ideal to me as it allows me to crawl/choke up on the blade and use the tip super effectively. Longer than that is difficult to take advantage of one of the more prominant advantages of the Wharnie...its acute tip. AS far as the unique frind described by Sal, absolutely, sounds interesting and I wold give it a try.

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:47 pm
by RamZar
Wharncliffe, Sheepsfoot and Reverse Tanto are my favorite EDC blades. I prefer Reverse Tanto most for its stout tip. Sheepsfoot is great for tip safety (my keychain knife is a ManBug Salt Sheepsfoot SpyderEdge). Wharncliffe is great for sharp pointy tip.

I found this article about the history of Wharncliffe blades (first Lord of Wharncliffe — James Archibald Stuart-Wortley-Mackenzie — was having dinner with his relative Archdeacon Corbett in Great Britain), tactical applications of Wharncliffe by Michael Janich and the various related blade shapes.

https://blog.knife-depot.com/history-of ... ffe-blade/

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 6:21 pm
by prndltech
Woodpuppy wrote:
Fri Oct 23, 2020 4:12 pm
I have a Leek, it is a useful blade shape; but I find the stainless steel handle too slick. And the handle overall too small.
Man, being in the automotive industry, many guys I worked with over the years used and abused leeks. It’s truly astounding. I wish I had pictures of them all.

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 7:15 pm
by Woodpuppy
prndltech wrote:
Tue Oct 27, 2020 6:21 pm
Woodpuppy wrote:
Fri Oct 23, 2020 4:12 pm
I have a Leek, it is a useful blade shape; but I find the stainless steel handle too slick. And the handle overall too small.
Man, being in the automotive industry, many guys I worked with over the years used and abused leeks. It’s truly astounding. I wish I had pictures of them all.
Many busted blades? Or did they hold up?

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:12 am
by RamZar
Woodpuppy wrote:
Fri Oct 23, 2020 4:12 pm
I have a Leek, it is a useful blade shape; but I find the stainless steel handle too slick. And the handle overall too small.

Part of the smallness of the steel handle on the Leek is due to how slim it is at just a third of an inch thick! There was one of the better Leek folders with S30V and G-10 (still under $100 when available). Lots to like but the assisted opening I disliked.

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2020 5:40 am
by Woodpuppy
I hadn’t seen that one. I’ve thought about putting traction tape on the smooth side, but I don’t use the knife often; mine has unimpressive mystery steel. Certainly no match for Spyderco!

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2020 6:14 am
by RamZar
Woodpuppy wrote:
Wed Oct 28, 2020 5:40 am
I hadn’t seen that one. I’ve thought about putting traction tape on the smooth side, but I don’t use the knife often; mine has unimpressive mystery steel. Certainly no match for Spyderco!

There were a couple of Leek folders with S30V/G-10 but that was a while back. Most have slippery stainless steel handles with blade steels of Swedish 14C28N steel or composites of 14C28N/D2. All well under $100 and made in the USA. The more expensive ones have CPM-S30V and CPM-154 blade steel.

Ken Onion was the designer of the Leek and he has some great designs.

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2020 7:06 am
by Michael Janich
Hey, All:

As a little bit of history, "reverse tanto" is a recent, and, in my opinion, completely unnecessary addition to blade-shape terminology. If you look back to classic pocketknife blade shapes, their names covered all the possible variations of the point styles pretty thoroughly. In fact, the article RamZar cited on Knife Depot's blog acknowledged the subtle, but well established, differences between Wharncliffe, sheepfoot, lambfoot, coping, etc.

Before Bob Lum's custom-made tantos, a tanto was only the traditional Japanese expression of that style, which had a curved edge near the point and had to have a tsuba (disk-shaped guard, like a katana). Without a tsuba, that same style of knife would properly be called an aikuchi. Bob Lum was the first to put a faceted katana-style kissaki (point) on his modern interpretation of the tanto. Cold Steel took Lum's idea and ran with it to create their now iconic modern tanto.

Now, most people think an "Americanized tanto," as it's sometimes called, is what a tanto is supposed to be and the understanding of the real history behind it is fading. While "reverse tanto" sounds cooler than "lambfoot" or "coping," in reality, that blade shape already had a name. We just need to look deep enough into well-established knife history to identify it.

I don't mean to sound like a crusty old guy, but knives have a deep history and tradition. While I am all for innovation and I do not believe that "everything has already been done," ignoring established history is not innovation. If someone points to the letter "W" and calls it a "reverse M," they haven't invented anything...

Stay safe,

Mike

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2020 7:19 am
by Evil D
Michael Janich wrote:
Wed Oct 28, 2020 7:06 am
Hey, All:

As a little bit of history, "reverse tanto" is a recent.....


Stay safe,

Mike



I've been thinking about a REAL reverse tanto for some time...where the angled slope of the tip of the blade stays the same thickness as the spine, and the blade grind that blends into that thicker chisel grind you see on tantos. I've never seen a wharnie with a tanto tip but I'm sure it can be done, seems like an untapped idea that could be useful for utility and self defense since the tip would be far less likely to break or chip.

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:26 am
by prndltech
Woodpuppy wrote:
Tue Oct 27, 2020 7:15 pm
prndltech wrote:
Tue Oct 27, 2020 6:21 pm
Woodpuppy wrote:
Fri Oct 23, 2020 4:12 pm
I have a Leek, it is a useful blade shape; but I find the stainless steel handle too slick. And the handle overall too small.
Man, being in the automotive industry, many guys I worked with over the years used and abused leeks. It’s truly astounding. I wish I had pictures of them all.
Many busted blades? Or did they hold up?
Maybe some crudely regrind tips... but ultimately they took all of it year after year and kept going! I had one before I really got into knives as well. The tool guys used to sell kershaw blades, so it was/is very common to see them in shops. Most guys love the assisted opening, I’m indifferent on it if I’m I’m honest. But I haven’t carried a CAI knife in years because I found this cool company with holes on the blade.

Re: Wharncliffe's

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:57 am
by RamZar
Michael Janich wrote:
Wed Oct 28, 2020 7:06 am
As a little bit of history, "reverse tanto" is a recent, and, in my opinion, completely unnecessary addition to blade-shape terminology. While "reverse tanto" sounds cooler than "lambsfoot" or "coping," in reality, that blade shape already had a name. We just need to look deep enough into well-established knife history to identify it.

I think the Benchmade 940 popularized “reverse tanto” for better or worse. It’s part of the lexicon of blade shapes now. Is the tip of a reverse tanto any more stout than lambsfoot/coping? I don’t know. Perhaps they’re the same. Prior to said article I had not heard of lambsfoot/coping since my knife age is not as old as my real age.

My first Wharncliffe was a Beretta JKTRID85 Trident folder (VG-10 , Cocobolo, Liner Lock, Seki Japan). Very classic Wharnie from around 2000 or so. Then, in 2005, it was Benchmade 940 Reverse Tanto and shortly thereafter Benchmade Snody 425 Gravitator.

Image
Image